Identification of Secondary Problems of New Technologies in Process Engineering by Patent Analysis

  • Pavel LivotovEmail author
  • Mas’udah
  • Arailym Sarsenova
  • Arun Prasad Chandra Sekaran


The implementation of new technologies in production plants often causes negative side effects and drawbacks. In this context, the prediction of the secondary problems and risks can be used advantageously for selecting best solutions for intensification of the processes. The proposed method puts primary emphasis on systematic and fast anticipation of secondary problems using patent documents, and on extraction and prediction of possible engineering contradictions within novel technical systems. The approach comprises three ways to find secondary problems: (a) direct knowledge-based identification of secondary problems in new technologies or equipment; (b) identification of secondary problems of prototypes mentioned in patent citation trees; and (c) prediction of negative side effects using the correlation matrix for invention goals and secondary problems in a specific engineering domain.



The authors wish to thank the European Commission for supporting their work as part of the research project “Intensified by Design® platform for the intensification of processes involving solids handling” within international consortium under the H2020 SPIRE programme.


  1. Altshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an exact science. The theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, issn 0275-5807. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. Asche, G. (2017). “80% of technical information found only in patents” – Is there proof of this? World Patent Information, 48, 16–28. Scholar
  3. Benali, M., & Kudra, T. (2015). Drying process intensification: Application to food processing. Retrieved September 11, 2016, from
  4. Cascini, G., & Russo, D. (2007). Computer-aided analysis of patents and search for TRIZ contradictions. International Journal of Product Development, 4(1/2), 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casner, D., & Livotov, P. (2017, August 21–25). Advanced innovation design approach for process engineering (pp. 653–662). Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17). Vol 4: Design methods and tools, Vancouver. isbn 978-1-904670-92-6.Google Scholar
  6. Chechurin, L., & Borgianni, Y. (2016). Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications. Computers in Industry, 82, 119–134. Scholar
  7. Choi, C., & Park, Y. (2009). Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 754–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cross, W., & Ramshaw, C. (1986). Process intensification: Laminar flow heat transfer. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 64(4), 293–301.Google Scholar
  9. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghebre-Sellassie, I., Jr Mollan, M. J., Pathak, N., Lodaya, M., & Fessehaie, M. (2002). Continuous production of pharmaceutical granulation. US Patent 6499984B1.Google Scholar
  12. Hua, Z., Yang, J., Coulibaly, S., & Zhang, B. (2010). Integration TRIZ with problem-solving tools: A literature review from 1995 to 2006. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 1(1/2), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33(2), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanda, A. S. (2008). An investigative study of patents from an engineering design perspective. PhD. Clemson University, Clemson.Google Scholar
  15. Kardashev, G. A. (1990). Physical methods of process intensification in chemical technology. Moscow: Khimia. 208p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. Karvonen, M., & Kässi, T. (2013). Patent citation analysis as a tool for analysing industry convergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 1094–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, J., Kim, D., Lee, Y., Lim, W., & Moon, I. (2009). Application of TRIZ creativity intensification approach to chemical process safety. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(6), 1039–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, S., Lee, S., Seol, H., et al. (2008). Using patent information for designing new product and technology: Keyword based technology road mapping. R&D Management, 38(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Livotov, P. (2015). Using patent information for identification of new product features with high market potential. World conference: TRIZ future, TF 2011–2014, Elsevier, Germany. Procedia Engineering 131, 1157–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moehrle, M., & Geritz, A. (2004). Developing acquisition strategies based on patent maps (pp. 1–9). Proceedings of the 13th international conference on management of technology, Washington, DC: R&D Management.Google Scholar
  21. Noailly, J., & Shestalova, V. (2017). Knowledge spillovers from renewable energy technologies: Lessons from patent citations. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patel, D., & Ward, M. R. (2011). Using patent citation patterns to infer innovation market competition. Research Policy, 40(6), 886–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pokhrel, C., Cruz, C., Ramirez, Y., & Kraslawski, A. (2015). Adaptation of TRIZ contradiction matrix for solving problems in process engineering. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 103, 3–10. Scholar
  24. Reay, D. A., Ramshaw, C., & Harvey, A. (2013). Process intensification: Engineering for efficiency, sustainability, and flexibility (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  25. Shanmugam, S. (2015). Granulation techniques and technologies: Recent progresses. BioImpacts: BI, 5, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Souili, A., Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., & Zanni, C. (2015). Starting from patent to find inputs to the problem graph model of IDM-TRIZ. Procedia Engineering, 131, 150–161. Scholar
  27. Srinivasan, R., & Kraslawski, A. (2006). Application of the TRIZ creativity enhancement approach to design of inherently safer chemical processes. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 45, 507–514. Scholar
  28. van Raan, A. F. J. (2017). Patent citations analysis and its value in research evaluation: A review and a new approach to map technology-relevant research. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(1), 13–50. Scholar
  29. Vasantha, G. V. A., Corney, J. R., Maclachla, R., & Wodehouse, A. J. (2017). The analysis and presentation of patents to support engineering design. Design Computing and Cognition, 16, 209–226. Retrieved August 10, 2017, from
  30. Verhaegen, P. A., D’Hondt, J., Vertommen, J., et al. (2009). Relating properties and functions from patents to TRIZ trends. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(3), 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, H., Mustaffar, A., Phan, A. N., Zivkovic, V., Reay, D. A., Law, R., & Boodhoo, K. (2017). A review of process intensification applied to solids handling. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 118, 78–107. Scholar
  32. Zlotin, B., & Zusman, A. (2010). Addressing secondary problems – The last obstacle on the way of successful problem solving with TRIZ. TRIZCON. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Polytechnic University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavel Livotov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mas’udah
    • 1
  • Arailym Sarsenova
    • 1
  • Arun Prasad Chandra Sekaran
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Laboratory for Product and Process InnovationOffenburg University of Applied SciencesOffenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations