Advertisement

On the Environmental Responsibility of Chinese Enterprises for Their FDIs in Countries Within the Belt and Road Initiative

  • Desheng Hu
  • Jun Ou
  • Xueyue Hu
Chapter

Abstract

Environmental protection is an essential aspect of the One Belt and One Road Initiative. Chinese enterprises need to pay close attention to their environmental responsibilities arising from their foreign direct investments (FDIs) in other Belt and Road countries. The determination of environmental responsibility is required to consider the sources of environmental obligations and operational logic of different dispute settlement mechanisms. Chinese enterprises face environmental obligations from four dimensions—that is, the Chinese government, host countries, international law, and other informal environmental obligations. The choice of a specific dispute settlement approach depends upon a series of considerations. When pre-judging and evaluating their environmental obligations, Chinese enterprises should, on the basis of the just and reasonable settlement of environmental disputes, clarify the environmental standards, identify the legitimacy and rationality of governmental regulations, review the objective environmental consequence(s), and determine the doctrine of liability fixation to be applied. Chinese enterprises should adjust their development principles of FDI, perform due diligence and prudence, and utilize multiple dispute resolution mechanisms.

References

  1. Bazillier, R., Hatte, S., & Vauday, J. (2013). Environmental responsibility and FDI: Do firms relocate their irresponsibilities abroad? (G-MonD Working Paper no 32), pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  2. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer, T. L. (1994). International investment dispute settlement procedures: The evolving regime for foreign direct investment. Law and Policy in International Business, 26(1), 633–672.Google Scholar
  4. Dong, B., Gong, J., & Zhao, X. (2012). FDI and environmental regulation: Pollution haven or a race to the top? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 41(2), 216–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghouri, A. (2016). Towards greater integration? Legal and policy directions of Chinese investments in Pakistan on the advent of the Silk Road economic Belt. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 4(1), 36–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Han, X. (2010). On environmental regulation measures of host country from judgments of the international investment dispute settlement bodies. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 6, 22–27 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. Han, X. (2013). Environmental protection issues in China’s overseas investment. International Studies, 157(5), 103–115 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holmes, O. W. (1991). The common law (Rev. ed., p. 1). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, D. (2012). China’s governance of exhaustible natural resources under the WTO era. Energy Procedia, 16, 656–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu, D. (2014). On China’s framework of energy regulation: A perspective of mixed economy. Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 34(4), 1–8 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. Hu, D., & Xu, S. (2013). Opportunity, challenges and policy choices for China on the development of shale gas. Energy Policy, 60, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, H. (2015). One Belt One Road strategy: From a perspective of public goods. World Economics and Politics, 6, 138–155 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. Hunter, T., & Bansal, P. (2007). How standard is standardized MNC global environmental communication? Business Ethics, 71(2), 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ICSID. (2016). Pac Rim Cayman LLC v Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/12. Retrieved December 31, 2016, from http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7640_0.pdf
  17. Kelemen, R. D. (2010). Globalizing European Union environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2012). What determines Chinese outward FDI? Journal of World Business, 47(1), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, F. (2014). China’s OFDI and overseas social responsibility strategy. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 6, 35–38 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (2000). Path dependence. In B. Bouckaert & G. D. Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (Vol. 1, p. 981). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, E. (2015). The structuring of the legal system of environmental protection in the construction of “the Belt and Road” project. Theory and Modernization, 236(6), 108–112 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Liu, H., & Su, J. (2014a). The status and problems of Chinese OFDI. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 7, 37–41 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Liu, H., & Su, J. (2014b). The status quo of Chinese OFDI and its problems. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 7, 37–41 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  24. Liu, W. (2014). Scientific understanding of the Belt and Road initiative of China and related research themes. Progress in Geography, 34(5), 538–544 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  25. Liu, Z. (2011). Analyzing and improving the environmental clauses of China’s international investment agreements. Law Science Magazine, 32(12), 90–93 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  26. Marconi, D. (2012). Environmental regulation and revealed comparative advantages in Europe: Is China a pollution haven? Review of International Economics, 20(3), 616–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MOFCOM, National Bureau of Statistics, State Administration of Foreign Exchange. (2016). 2015 Statistical bulletin of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  28. MOFCOM-PRC. (2016). Statistics on China’s Non-Financial Direct Investment in other Belt and Road Countries in January–October of 2016 (in Chinese). Retrieved December 31, 2016, from http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/tongjiziliao/dgzz/201612/20161202222469.shtmlGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore, S. A. (1996). Defining “successful” environmental dispute resolution: Case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(3), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Namballa, V. C. (2014). Global environmental liability: Multinational corporations under scrutiny. Warwick Research Journal, 1(2), 181–205.Google Scholar
  31. Nanda, V. P., & Pring, G. R. (2012). International environmental law and policy for the 21st century (p. 97). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  32. Nwapi, C. (2014). Jurisdiction by necessity and the regulation of the transnational corporate actor. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 30(78), 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pothmulla, L. (2016). Colombo port city project suspended. In P. Willis (Ed.), Daily mirror. London: Trinity Mirror.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, P. P., Jalal, K. F., & Boyd, J. A. (Eds.). (2012). An introduction to sustainable development (p. 46). Earthscan: London.Google Scholar
  36. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2015). World investment report 2015. Geneva: United Nations Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, H. (2016). The Belt and Road green development is vibrant. In Chinese social sciences today. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  38. Wang, L. (2008). On construction of the structure and system of China’s tort liability law: From the perspective of relief law. China Legal Science, 4, 3–15 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  39. Xu, C. (2010). A commentary and critical on the recent international investment disputes arbitration: To introduce the theory of global governance. The Jurist, 153(3), 143–153 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  40. Yang, H., Wu, D., & Wang, S. (2012). The stages and tactics of China’s “walking out” strategy. International Business, 6, 75–85 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  41. Zeng, X., & Zhao, H. (2011). On liability principles of environmental tort. Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 65(6), 135–139 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, X., & Daly, K. (2011). The determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review, 12(4), 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng, L., & Liu, Z. (2015). Spatial pattern of Chinese outward direct investment in the Belt and Road initiative area. Progress in Geography, 34(5), 563–570 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Desheng Hu
    • 1
  • Jun Ou
    • 2
  • Xueyue Hu
    • 3
  1. 1.Law School, Silk Road Institute for International and Comparative Law, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Law School, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.Department of Geography and EnvironmentLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations