Advertisement

The Normative Foundations of the Belt and Road Initiative

  • Anastas Vangeli

Abstract

The purpose of the BRI not only to impact the global political economy; but also to change the way others relate to and think about the global political economy and their role in it, in dialogue with China’s proposal. In other words, the BRI is not only concept that raises the question of the quantitative changes in the global political economy—it equally concerns the question of qualitative, normative changes, or rather the questions how and against what backdrop will the China-led interactions along the Belt&Road develop, and what are their normative implications. This chapter therefore aims to provide an innovative and critical normative reading of the BRI. As a concept, the BRI is rooted in the thinking and practice of CPC and at the same time a product of a changing Chinese, but also changing global context. The chapter therefore briefly analyzes the normative sources of the BRI, which are to be found in China’s own developmental path and its new foreign policy under Xi Jinping. Then, the chapter turns to analysis of the six core normative principles of the BRI: shared destiny, sovereignty, state-led economic cooperation, new regionalism, and the philosophy of flexible, experimental and exception-ridden practice. The final section turns to the discussion of the potential pathways of diffusion of these normative principles along the countries and regions involved in the BRI.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank the ZEIT-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius for the generous support of their work in the period 2015–2018.

References

  1. Ambrosio, T. (2012). The rise of the ‘China Model’ and ‘Beijing Consensus’: Evidence of authoritarian diffusion? Contemporary Politics, 18(4), 381–399.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2012.728029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andornino, G. B. (2017). The Belt and Road Initiative in China’s emerging grand strategy of connective leadership. China & World Economy, 25, 4–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balkans In Europe Policy Advisory Group. (2017). The crisis of democracy in the Western Balkans. Authoritarianism and EU stabilitocracy. Balkans In Europe Policy Advisory Group.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, M. (2011). Who’s afraid of China? The challenge of Chinese soft power. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Beesley, A., Byrne, A., & Kynge, J. (2017). EU sets collision course with China over ‘Silk Road’ rail project. Financial Times. Google Scholar
  6. Beeson, M., & Li, F. (2016). China’s place in regional and global governance: A new world comes into view. Global Policy, 7(4), 491–499.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N., Johnson, L., & Zhang, J. (Eds.). (2013). Chinese outward investment: An emerging policy framework. A compilation of primary sources. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development and Institute for International Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Blumenthal, D. (2017). A strategy for China’s imperial overstretch. American Interest. Retrieved January 24, 2018, from https://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/03/01/a-strategy-for-chinas-imperial-overstretch/
  9. Boer, R. (2017). Interpreting Marx’s capital in China. Continental Thought and Theory, 1(4), 177–206.Google Scholar
  10. Bradford, A., & Posner, E. A. (2011). Universal exceptionalism in international law. Harvard International Law Journal, 52, 1–40.Google Scholar
  11. Bremmer, I. (2008). The return of state capitalism. Survival, 50, 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330802173198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breslin, S. (2011). The ‘China Model’ and the global crisis: From Friedrich list to a Chinese mode of governance? International Affairs, 87(6), 1323–1343.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryant, O., & Chou, M. (2016). China’s New Silk Road: Autocracy promotion in the new Asian order? Democratic Theory, 3(2), 114–124.  https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2016.030207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castellucci, I. (2007). Rule of law with Chinese characteristics. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 13(1), 35.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, G. (陈刚) (2017). 中国“一带一路”战略的外交思想根源 – zhongguo yidayilu zhanlue de waijio sixiang genyuan – The Origins of China’s Belt and Road Strategy. 联合早报 Lianhe Zaobao.Google Scholar
  16. Chu, Y., & So, A. Y. (2010). State neoliberalism: The Chinese road to capitalism. In Y. Chu (Ed.), Chinese capitalisms (pp. 46–72). International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan UK.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-25135-9_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (Eds.). (2015). Making policy move: Towards a politics of translation and assemblage. Bristol, England: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dreher, A., Fuchs, A., Parks, B., Strange, A., & Tierney, M. (2017). Aid, China, and growth: Evidence from a new global development finance dataset. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  19. Fasslabend, W. (2015). The Silk Road: A political marketing concept for world dominance. European View, 14, 293–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-015-0381-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferdinand, P. (2016). Westward ho-the China dream and ‘One Belt, One Road’: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, 92, 941–957.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fukuyama, F. (2016, January 12). Exporting the Chinese model. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-one-belt-one-road-strategy-by-francis-fukuyama-2016-01
  22. Gilardi, F. (2013). Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (Chapter 18). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/hdbk_interntlrelations/SAGE.xml
  23. Gitter, D. (2017, October 28). China sells socialism to the developing world. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/china-sells-socialism-to-the-developing-world/
  24. Godehardt, N. (2016). No end of history. A Chinese alternative concept of international order? (SWP Research Paper). German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/no-end-of-history/
  25. Hall, I. (2017). Belt and Road: The case for ‘wait and see.’ The Interpreter. Retrieved January 24, 2018, from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/belt-and-road-case-wait-and-see
  26. Heilmann, S., Moritz, M., Houtari, M., & Buckow, J. (2014). China’s shadow foreign policy: Parallel structures challenge the established international order (China Monitor no. 28). Mercator Institute for China Studies, Berlin. http://www.merics.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/China-Monitor/China_Monitor_No_18_en.pdf
  27. Huaxia. (2017). CPC Q&A: What are China’s two centennial goals and why do they matter? Xinhua News. Google Scholar
  28. Hungarian Government. (2014). Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp. Government. Retrieved October 19, 2014, from http://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-orban-s-speech-at-the-25th-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp
  29. Jacques, M. (2012). When China rules the world: The end of the western world and the birth of a new global order (2nd ed.) (Greatly expanded and fully updated). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Jakobowski, J. (in press). Examining Chinese-led regional multilateralism: the “16+1” platform in the context of China-Africa and China-Latin America relations. Journal of Contemporary China. Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, C. K. (2016). President Xi Jinping’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative. Center for Strategic and International Studies. http://csis.org/publication/president-xi-jinpings-belt-and-road-initiative
  32. Kaczmarski, M. (2017). Non-western visions of regionalism: China’s New Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union. International Affairs, 93(6), 1357–1376.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kavalski, E. (2013). The struggle for recognition of normative powers: Normative power Europe and normative power China in context. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 247–267.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirby, W. (2011). China’s prosperous age: A century in the making. China Heritage Quarterly (26). http://www.chinaheritagequarterly.org/features.php?searchterm=026_kirby.inc&issue=026
  35. Leander, A. (2008). Thinking tools: Analyzing symbolic power and violence. In A. Klotz & D. Prakash (Eds.), Qualitative methods in international relations: A pluralist guide (pp. 11–28). Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, J.-Y. (2016). Hegemonic authority and domestic legitimation: Japan and Korea under Chinese hegemonic order in early modern East Asia. Security Studies, 25(2), 320–352.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2016.1171970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, E. X. (2017). China, America, and “Nationalism”. American Affairs Journal. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2017/10/china-americanationalism
  38. Li, X., Brødsgaard, K. E., & Jacobsen, M. (2010). Redefining Beijing consensus: Ten economic principles. China Economic Journal, 2(3), 297–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17538960903529535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li, Y. (2017b, October 25). Xi Jinping thought has global influence. Belt and Road Portal. https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/qwyw/rdxw/31488.htm
  40. Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2016). Inclusive globalization: Unpacking China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Area Development and Policy, 1(3), 323–340.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2016.1232598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lukes, S. (2004). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Hampshire, England/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Lukes, S. (2007). Power and the battle for hearts and minds: On the bluntness of soft power. In F. Berenskoetter & M. J. Williams (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 83–97). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Nathan, A. J. (2015). China’s challenge. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 156–170.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. National Development and Research Commission. (2015). Vision and actions on jointly building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-century Maritime Silk Road. National Development and Research Commission of the People’s Republic of China. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html
  45. Ong, A. (2012). Neoliberal as political technology. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Wiley. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog421/abstract
  46. Overholt, W. H. (2010). China in the global financial crisis: Rising influence, rising challenges. The Washington Quarterly, 33, 21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01636600903418652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pantucci, R. (2016, October 7). How new is the ‘Belt and Road’? China Policy Institute: Analysis (blog). https://cpianalysis.org/2016/10/07/how-new-is-the-belt-and-road/
  48. Peerenboom, R. (2013). Toward a methodology for successful legal transplants. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 1(1), 4–20.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxs002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peto, S. (2017). Hungary launches rail link tender as CEE-China summit starts. Reuters. Google Scholar
  50. Qiu, Z. (2015a). From ‘Game Player’ to ‘Game Maker’: News features of China’s Foreign Policy. China Brief, 15(14). http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=44174&cHash=5953f99bd5b663abf2bf57f8e823b7e3
  51. Qiu, Z. (2015b). The ‘Triple Win’: Beijing’s Blueprint for International Industrial Capacity Cooperation. China Brief, 15(18). https://jamestown.org/program/the-triple-win-beijings-blueprint-for-international-industrial-capacity-cooperation/
  52. Ramo, J. C. (2007). Brand China. London: Foreign Policy Centre.Google Scholar
  53. Reuters. (2017). Sri Lanka hands over running of Hambantota port to Chinese company. South China Morning Post. Google Scholar
  54. Sheng, A., & Geng, X. (2017, October 25). Modernity with Chinese characteristics. Project Syn dicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/19th-congress-xi-jinping-development-plan-by-andrew-sheng-and-xiao-geng-2017-10
  55. Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2008). The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. So, A. Y., & Chu, Y. (2012). The transition from neoliberalism to state neoliberalism in China at the turn of the twenty-first century. In C. Kyung-Sup, B. Fine, & L. Weiss (Eds.), Developmental politics in transition (pp. 166–187). International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan UK.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137028303_9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. So, A. Y., & Chu, Y. (2015). The global rise of China. Cambridge, England/Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stone, D. (2001). Learning lessons, policy transfer and the international diffusion of policy ideas (CSGR Working Paper 69/01). Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, The University of Warwick, Warwick. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2056/1/WRAP_Stone_wp6901.pdf
  59. Vangeli, A. (in press-a). A framework for the study of the One Belt, One Road Initiative as a medium of principle-diffusion. In X. Li (Ed.), Mapping China’s “One Belt One Road” Initiative. Palgrave.Google Scholar
  60. Vangeli, A. (in press-b). Global China and symbolic power: The case of 16+1 cooperation. Journal of Contemporary China. Google Scholar
  61. Vasiliev, I. A., & Shmigelskaia, N. A. (2016). The revival of the Silk Road: Brief review of the 4th China-Eurasia Legal Forum. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, (2), 94–101.  https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2016.209.
  62. Wade, R. (2004). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization, with a new introduction by the author. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2. pbk. edn.Google Scholar
  63. Wang, G. (2008). China and the international order: Some historical perspectives. In G. Wang & Y. Zheng (Eds.), China and the new international order (pp. 21–31). Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Womack, B. (2008). China as a normative foreign policy actor (CEPS Working Documents). Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels. http://aei.pitt.edu/11662/1/1607.pdf
  65. Xi, J. (2017). Jointly shoulder responsibility of our times, promote global growth. Keynote Speech at the Opening Session of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2017. CGTN Am. Retrieved January 24, 2018, from https://america.cgtn.com/2017/01/17/full-text-of-xi-jinping-keynote-at-the-world-economic-forum
  66. Xie, T. (2015). Is China’s “Belt and Road” a strategy? The Diplomat. Google Scholar
  67. Xinhua News. (2017). “Belt and Road” incorporated into CPC Constitution. Xinhua News. Google Scholar
  68. Yan, X. (2014). From keeping a low profile to striving for achievement. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7, 153–184.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pou027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang, J. (2015). China’s ‘New Diplomacy’ under the Xi Jinping administration. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 01(01), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740015500013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang, J. (2017). Study and implement General Secretary Xi Jinping’s thought on diplomacy in a deep-going way and keep writing new chapters of major-country diplomacy with distinctive Chinese features. Google Scholar
  71. Zhang, J. (2015). China’s new foreign policy under Xi Jinping: Towards ‘Peaceful Rise 2.0’? Global Change, Peace & Security, 27, 5–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2015.993958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhao, S. (2010). The China Model: Can it replace the western model of modernization? Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 419–436.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10670561003666061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhao, Y. (2008). Neoliberal strategies, socialist legacies: Communication and state transformation in China. In P. Chakravartty & Y. Zhao (Eds.), Global communications: Toward a transcultural political economy (pp. 23–50). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastas Vangeli
    • 1
  1. 1.Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations