Reusing Lost Urban Space

  • Rana SameehEmail author
  • Mostafa Gabr
  • Sherine Aly


The city is one of the greatest products of human civilization that has been built to provide services; safety and comfort. However, uncontrolled urban growth caused some anonymous, and unsightly images of the cities among which are underused, abandoned, or deserted urban space. Public space in cities reflects social life, and hosts community interaction; the absence of social interaction changes the public space to wasted and lost spaces. Wasted urban space leads to the discontinuity of the urban fabric creating meaningless unstructured landscapes within the city’s urban fabric. Wasted space is the unrecognized areas of land that are in need of redesign; their value is derived from their potential in vitalizing and connecting their surrounding urban context.

The research significance lies in recognizing the importance of community urban open spaces, their value and impact. The research also addresses the reuse and the regeneration of lost urban spaces in order to enhance the physical and social quality of life in urban open space. In addition, the reuse of in-between left over space is an incremental process that is addressed in building totally new cities which follow phasing development plans; as well as vitalizing the land of already existing cities.

Connecting or stitching the discontinuous urban fabric, represents an exploratory process in the relationship between infrastructure and the urban fabric and seeks to establish an architectural solution to leftover spaces within the city. In doing so, the research establishes a framework (criteria) for reuse of lost urban space by implementing an inductive and deductive analytical methodology applied to relevant examples and case studies of lost urban space.


Lost urban space Reuse Urban open space Stitching urban fabric Revitalizing cities Rehabilitation of open space 


  1. Archdaily. (2016). Archdaily. Retrieved from Archdaily:
  2. ASLA. (2007). Retrieved from
  3. Dara Rourke, G. N. (2002). MIT east campus life cycle assessment project. Retrieved from archi node web site.Google Scholar
  4. Google Earth. (2016). Retrieved from
  5. Im-Sik Cho, C. K. (2016). Re-framing urban space: Urban design for emerging hybrid and high-density conditions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Lawrence Perkins, P. W. (2016). Perkins+will. Retrieved from perkins+will website:
  7. Matthew Carmona, F. M. (2011). Capital spaces: The multiple complex public spaces of a global city. London/NewYork: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Michael Larice, E. M. (2013). The urban design reader. NewYork: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Nefs, M. (2006). Unused urban space:Conservation or transformation? Polemics about the future of urban wastelands and abandoned buildings. City & Time, 2(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
  10. PPS. (2016). Project for public spaces. Retrieved from,
  11. Rob Krier. (1979). Urban Space. Academy Group Ltd. LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. The High Line. (2016). Retrieved from
  13. Tiesdell, M. C. (2007). Urban design reader. Oxford: El Sevier.Google Scholar
  14. Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. New York: Van.Google Scholar
  15. Vladimir, D. (2007). Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime TransportAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations