The Letter-Poem and Its Literary Affect: Mark Ford’s ‘The Death of Hart Crane’

  • Anthony CaleshuEmail author


In this essay, Caleshu explores Mark Ford’s prose poem, ‘The Death of Hart Crane’ for its epistolary/prose poem crossover and its perpetuation of literary affect. The history of the relationship between the fictitious letter and the prose poem is traced back through French and American literature, from Baudelaire to Ashbery. Ford’s reliance on literaryness is explored as conditioning a major point of affective tension within his work, while affect theory (via Gregg and Seigworth) and similarly queer theory (via Stein and Bray), provide an infrastructure for the deconstruction of this poem’s coded interests in manoeuvring between sex and time.

Works Cited

  1. de Montaigne, Michel. Essays of Michel de Montaigne. Edited by William Carew Hazlitt. Translated by Charles Cotton. Project Gutenberg Ebook. Volume 6. Accessed 1 September 2016.
  2. de Pree, Julia. The Ravishment of Persephone: Epistolary Lyric in the Siècle des Lumières. Chapel Hill, NC: Department of Romance Languages, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. Delville, Michel. The American Prose Poem: Poetic Form and the Boundaries of Genre. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. Ford, Mark. “She Spears.” In Soft Sift, 32–33. London: Faber and Faber, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. ———. “James Schuyler and Englishness.” In A Driftwood Altar: Essays and Reviews, 167. London: Waywiser Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  6. ———. “Not Ready for Repentance: Hart Crane.” In Mr. and Mrs. Stevens and Other Essays, 83. London: Peter Lang, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. ———. “Coda: An Interview with Anthony Caleshu.” In Mr. and Mrs. Stevens and Other Essays, edited by Mark Ford. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. ———. “The Death of Hart Crane.” In Six Children. London: Faber & Faber, 2011.Google Scholar
  9. ———. Unpublished Interview with Anthony Caleshu, 9 July 2017.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. “Sexual Choice, Sexual Act: Foucault and Homosexuality.” In Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984, edited by Lawrence D. Kritzman, translated by Alan Sheridan et al. New York: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth, eds. The Affect Reader. Durham NC: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, Daniel. “James Schulyer’s Epistolary Poetry: Things, Postcards, Ekphrasis.” Journal of Modern Literature 34.1 (Fall 2010): 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Hara, Frank. “Personism.” In Selected Poems, edited by Mark Ford. New York: Knopf, 2008.Google Scholar
  14. “Poetry Foundation Announces Winner of the 2015 Pegasus Award for Poetry Criticism.” Accessed 20 July 2017.
  15. Pollard, Natalie. Speaking to You: Contemporary Poetry and Public Address. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stein, Jordan Alexander. “American Literary History and Queer Temporalities.” American Literary History 25.4 (Winter 2013). Accessed 31 August 2016.
  17. Stevens, Wallace. “Imagination as Value.” In Stevens: Collected Poetry and Prose. Washington: Library of America, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. Vendler, Helen. “The Circulation of Small Largeness: John Ashbery and Mark Ford.” In Some Things We Have That They Don’t: British and American Poetic Relations, edited by Mark Ford and Steve Clark. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2004. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations