Breaking the Silence: Lesbian Activism in Macedonia

  • Irena Cvetkovic


This chapter argues that lesbian women in Macedonia, their everyday practices, experiences of violence and discrimination as well as their struggles for human rights are unheard, marked as socially unimportant or unworthy. The lesbian political voice has in recent history become more of a silent ornament in the two major political and social discourses, the one of the gay rights movement and the other of the women’s movement. These practices of silencing the lesbian voice in the name of “the bigger picture” make possible the construction and framing of hegemonic political space marked as commonsensical, privileged, and patriarchal. Silence, I argue, is a core political strategy that marginalises lesbians and lesbian voices not only in the general public sphere, but also within the two domains where lesbian activism belongs: gay rights and feminism. Silence becomes a performative gesture that perpetuates the public’s lack of knowledge regarding female homosexuality.


  1. Ainley, R. (1995). What is she like? Lesbian identities from the 1950s to the 1990s. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, D. (1994). Power and community: Organisational and cultural responses to AIDS. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, T. J. (2003). The use of silence as a political rhetorical strategy, Unpublished master’s thesis, Eastern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  4. Being LGBTI in Eastern Europe: Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, National LGBTI Report, UNDP and USAID, 2017. Retrieved on January 25, 2018, from
  5. Brandão, A. M. (2009). Not quite women: Lesbian activism in Portugal. Retrieved on October 15, 2017, from
  6. Cvetkovic, I. (2007). Orgazmicni pisma. Skopje: Gjurgja.Google Scholar
  7. Dimitrov, S., & Kolozova, K. (2011). Sexualities in transition: Discourses, power and sexual minorities in transitional Macedonia. In K. Daskalova, H. C. Tomic, K. Kaser, & F. Radunovic (Eds.), Gendering post-socialist transition: Studies of changing gender perspectives (pp. 151–187). Vienna: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Haraway, D. (1991). The Cyborg manifesto: Science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. Retrieved on February 3, 2010, from
  9. Lorde, A. (1984/2007). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
  10. Miškovska Kajevska, A. (2016). Growing oppression, growing resistance: LGBT activism and Europeanisation in Macedonia. In B. Bilić (Ed.), LGBT Activism and Europeanisation in the post-Yugoslav space: On the rainbow way to Europe (pp. 81–116). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Perez, T. L., & Dionisopoulos, G. N. (1995). Presidential silence, C. Everett Koop, and the Surgeon General’s report on AIDS. Communication Studies, 46(1–2), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Škarić-Murdževa, O. (1996). A woman’s vision: Priorities, projects and strategies. Skopje: Macedonian Union of Women’s Organisations.Google Scholar
  13. Vrangalova, S. (2011). Treatment of homosexuality in the Macedonian educational system. In Ž. Trajanoski (Ed.), (Homo)sexuality in Macedonian education (pp. 24–43). Skopje: Coalition SHRMC.Google Scholar
  14. Women Studies. (2001). First generation of women studies 2000/2001. Skopje: Union of Women Organizations in Macedonia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irena Cvetkovic
    • 1
  1. 1.Coalition MarginsSkopjeMacedonia

Personalised recommendations