Advertisement

Counter Terrorism Law and Education: Student Teachers’ Induction into UK Prevent Duty Through the Lens of Bauman’s Liquid Modernity

  • Lynn RevellEmail author
  • Hazel Bryan
  • Sally Elton-Chalcraft
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the way student teachers understand their professional role in relation to the UK’s counter terrorism legislation as it relates to schools. Data were collected from one hundred and fifty students based on their experiences in schools and analysed using Bauman’s notion of liquid modernity as a theoretical frame. We argue that despite a normative attachment to notions of professional objectivity and political detachment in the classroom, most student teachers interpreted their new duties as legitimate and were uncritical of legislation and policy that expects them to play an overtly political role in schools.

Keywords

Counter terrorism law Liquid modernity Prevent duty Teacher education Teacher professionalism Radicalisation Extremism 

References

  1. Bauman, Z. (2005). Education in liquid modernity. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 27(4), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (2012). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z., & Haugaard, M. (2008). Culture, modernity and revolution. Journal of Power, 1(2), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best, S. (2017). Education in the interregnum: An evaluation of Zygmund Bauman’s liquid turn in education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(2), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan, H. (2012, August). Reconstructing the teacher as post-secular pedagogue: A consideration of the new teachers’ standards. Journal of Values and Beliefs, 33(2), 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan, H. (2017, in press). Developing the political citizen: How teachers are navigating the statutory demands of the counter-terrorism and Security Act 205 and the prevent duty. Journal of Education, Citizenship and Social Justice. Available at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1746197917717841 accessed on 12.05 .18
  7. Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elton-Chalcraft, S., Lander V., Revell, L., Warner, D., & Whitworth, L. (2017, February). To promote, or not to promote fundamental British values? Teachers’ standards, diversity and teacher education. British Educational Research Journal, 43(1). Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/berj.2017.43.issue-1/issuetoc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrell, F. (2016). Why all of a sudden do we need to teach fundamental British values? A critical investigation of religious education student teacher positioning within a policy discourse of discipline and control. Journal of Education for teaching, 42(3), 280–297. Special issue: Fundamental British Values.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Panjwani, F. (2016). Towards an overlapping consensus: Muslim teachers’ views on fundamental British values. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(3), 329–340. Special issue: Fundamental British Values.Google Scholar
  12. Revell, L., & Bryan, H. (2016). Calibrating fundamental British values: How head teachers are approaching appraisal in the light of the Teachers’ Standards 2012, Prevent and the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act, 2015. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 42(3), 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn Revell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hazel Bryan
    • 2
  • Sally Elton-Chalcraft
    • 3
  1. 1.Canterbury Christ Church UniversityCanterburyUK
  2. 2.University of GloucestershireCheltenhamUK
  3. 3.University of CumbriaCarlisleUK

Personalised recommendations