Advertisement

Student Voice and Educational Adjustments

  • Shiralee PoedEmail author
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Listening to the voices of students with disabilities offers educators opportunities for critical reflection on their practice (Peters, Br J Sociol Educ 31(5): 591–602, 2010), and allows children to have agency over educational decision-making. While these opportunities occur informally every day in classrooms, there is also a legal mandate that students with disabilities, or their parents/carers, are consulted in relation to educational adjustments. This chapter provides an overview of the legal obligation to consult students with disabilities in relation to adjustments made to their educational program, and the limits of this legislation. A brief discussion of Australian case law in relation to the obligation to consult is included, as well as guidance for improving meaningful participation for students with disabilities.

Keywords

Student voice Reasonable adjustments Meaningful participation Disability Standards for Education Obligation to consult 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Al Zidjaly, N. (2015). Disability, discourse and technology: Agency and inclusion in (inter) action. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldred, R. (2013). Broadening the boundaries of agency: Cognitive disability, agency, and autonomy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary. Retrieved from http://theses.ucalgary.ca/jspui/bitstream/11023/822/2/ucalgary_2013_aldred_raymond.pdf
  3. Anti-Discrimination Tribunal of Queensland. (2006, July 11). JC on behalf of BC v State of Queensland (ADTQ). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/qld/QADT/2006/27.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=JC%20on%20behalf%20of%20BC
  4. Arnstein-Kerslake, A., & Flynn, E. (2017). The right to legal agency: Domination, disability and the protections of article 12 of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Law in Context, 13(1), 22–38.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552316000458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashby, C. (2011). Whose “voice” is it anyway? Giving voice and qualitative research involving individuals that type to communicate. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(4), 26. Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1723/1771
  6. Australian Government [Department of Education Employment and Workforce Relations]. (2012). Report on the review of the disability standards for education 2005. Canberra: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Australian Government [Productivity Commission]. (2004). Review of the disability discrimination act 1992: Productivity commission inquiry report (Vol. 1). Melbourne: Author.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, D. A., & Lewis, C. N. (2013). Competence is in the eye of the beholder: Perceptions of intellectually disabled child witnesses. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 60(1), 3–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.757132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrnes, L. J., & Rickards, F. W. (2011). Listening to the voices of students with disabilities: Can such voices inform practice? Australasian Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1375/ajse.35.1.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cambra, J. E. (2016). Preparing for student led IEPs. Masters dissertation. Retrieved from http://csusm-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/174686/CambaJordan_Summer2016.pdf?sequence=1
  11. Castelli, P., & Goodman, G. S. (2014). Children’s perceived emotional behavior at disclosure and prosecutors’ evaluations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(9), 1521–1532. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paola_Castelli3/publication/261102978_Children’s_perceived_emotional_behavior_at_disclosure_and_prosecutors’_evaluations/links/5751b41f08ae17e65ec33f20.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavendish, W. (2013). Student perceptions of school efforts to facilitate student involvement, school commitment, self-determination and graduation track. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 257–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9212-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavendish, W., & Connor, D. (2017). Toward authentic IEPs and transition plans: Student, parent, and teacher perspectives. Learning Disability Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716684680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chua, A. C. K. (2015). A triple-E framework on parental involvement of children with autism spectrum disorder in early intervention. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 30, 579–586. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arnold_Chua3/publication/283150879_A_Triple-E_Framework_on_Parental_Involvement_of_Children_with_Autism_Spectrum_Disorder_in_Early_Intervention/links/562cd92208ae518e348244f9.pdf
  15. Cobb, B., Lehmann, J., Newman-Gonchar, R., & Alwell, M. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collier, M. L., Griffin, M. M., & Wei, Y. (2016). Facilitating student involvement in transition assessment: A pilot study of the student transition questionnaire. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(3), 175–184.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414556746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ComLaw. (2016). Disability standards for education 2005 [Cth] (DSE). Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2005L00767
  18. de Apodaca, R. F., Gentling, D. G., Steinhaus, J. K., & Rosenberg, E. A. (2015). Parental involvement as a mediator of academic performance among special education middle school students. School Community Journal, 25(2), 35–54. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085649.pdf
  19. Disability Discrimination Act. (1992). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/dda1992264/
  20. Dixon, R. M., & Tanner, K. (2013). The experience of transitioning two adolescents with Asperger syndrome in academically focused high schools. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 28–48.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jse.2013.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Education Council. (2016). Nationally consistent collection of data – School students with a disability: 2016 emergent data on students in Australian schools receiving adjustments for disability. Retrieved from http://www.educationcouncil.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/Reports%20and%20publications/ED17-0046%20SCH%20NCCD%20Report%202017_ACC.PDF
  22. Goldfarb, D., Goodman, G. S., & Lawler, M. (2015). Children’s evidence and the| convention on the rights of the child: Improving the legal system for children. In S. Mahmoudi, P. Leviner, A. Kaldal, & K. Lainpelto (Eds.), Child-friendly justice: A quarter of a century of the UN convention on the rights of the child (pp. 85–109). Leiden/Stockholm: Brill Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon, M. (2010). Student voice key to unlocking inclusive educational practices. Canadian Journal of New Scholars in Education, 3(2), 1–11. Retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/viewFile/30480/24877
  24. Griffin, M. M., Lounds Taylor, J., Urbano, R. C., & Hodapp, R. M. (2014). Involvement in transition planning meetings among high school students with autism spectrum disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 47(4), 256–264.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913475668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission. (1999, July 20). Finney v the Hills grammar school (HREOC). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HREOCA/1999/14.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Finney
  27. Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission. (2000, November 13). Purvis v state of New South Wales (Department of education) (HREOC). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HREOCA/2000/47.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Purvis
  28. Jackson, J., & Varnham, S. (2007). Law for educators: School and university law in Australia. Chatswood: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  29. Jubran, L. N. (2015). Student voice for enhancing the quality of inclusive education. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/bitstream/1234/778/1/120043.pdf
  30. Kaczkowski, M. (2012). A qualitative case study: Student perceptions of “voice” in the IEP process. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/c5dee189df2175348be5364e362a8488/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  31. Knutsson, J., & Allwood, C. M. (2014). Opinions of legal professionals: Comparing child and adult witnesses’ memory report capabilities. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6(2), 79–89. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lai, Y., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2013). The discourse of parent involvement in special education: A critical analysis linking policy documents to the experiences of mothers. Educational Policy, 27(6), 867–897.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812440501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landmark, L., Zhang, D., & Montoya, L. (2007). Culturally diverse parents’ experiences in their children’s transition: Knowledge and involvement. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 68–79.  https://doi.org/10.1177/08857288070300020401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landmark, L., Roberts, E., & Zhang, D. (2013). Educators’ beliefs and practices about parent involvement in transition planning. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 114–123.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412463047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, A. (2008). Silence in the context of ‘child voice’. Child & Society, 24, 14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00200.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindström, M. (2011). Promoting agency among people with severe psychiatric disability: Occupation-oriented interventions in home and community settings. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:458648/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  37. Meadan, H., Shelden, D., Appel, K., & DeGrazia, R. (2010). Developing a long-term vision: A road map for students’ futures. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43, 8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004300201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller, G. E., Colebrook, J., & Ellis, B. R. (2014). Advocating for the rights of the child through family–school collaboration. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 24(1), 10–27.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.870483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitchell, D. (2014). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies (2nd ed.). Milton Park: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nolan-Spohn, H. (2016). Increasing student involvement in IEPs. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 28(3), 300–308. Retrieved from http://www.mwera.org/MWER/volumes/v28/issue3/v28n3-Nolan-VOICES-FROM-THE-CLASSROOM.pdf
  41. Norwich, B. (2014). How does the capability approach address current issues in special educational needs, disability and inclusive education field? Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 14(1), 16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Neill, S., & Zajac, R. (2013). Preparing children for cross-examination: How does intervention timing influence efficacy? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(3), 307–320.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pagliano, P., & Gillies, R. M. (2015). Inclusive practices. In A. Ashman (Ed.), Education for inclusion and diversity (5th ed., pp. 131–161). Melbourne: Pearson.Google Scholar
  44. Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2017). The development of self-determination during childhood. In M. L. Wehmeyer, K. A. Shogren, T. D. Little, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Development of self-determination through the life-course (Ch. 6, pp. 71–88). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Pawley, H., & Tennant, G. (2008). Student perceptions of their IEP targets. Support for Learning, 23(4), 183–186.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00392.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peter, S. J. (2010). The heterodoxy of student voice: Challenges to identity in the sociology of disability and education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5), 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prout, A., & Hallett, C. (2003). Introduction. In C. Hallett & A. Prout (Eds.), Hearing the voices of children: Social policy for a new century (pp. 1–8). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  48. Rioux, M. (2013). Disability rights in education. In L. Florian (Ed.), The Sage handbook of special education: Volume 1 (2nd ed., pp. 131–147). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Robinson, J. (2015). The experience of the child witness: Legal and psychological issues. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 42, 168–176. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seong, Y., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., & Little, T. D. (2015). Effects of the self-directed individualized education program on self-determination and transition of adolescents with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 132–141.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414544359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shelley, M. (1991). Report on the national consultations with people with a disability. In Disability advisory council of Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.Google Scholar
  52. Shoemaker, D. (2010). Responsibility, agency, and cognitive disability. In E. Feder Kittay & L. Carlson (Eds.), Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy (Ch. 12, pp. 201–224). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, K. M. (2016). Investigating transition processes for students with special needs. Masters dissertation. Retrieved from http://opus.ipfw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=grad_research
  55. Stolz, S. M. (2010). Disability trajectories: Disabled youths’ identity development, negotiation of experience and expectation, and sense of agency during transition. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7zg9w5ht
  57. United Nations. (2000). Conventions on the Rights of the Child (CROC). Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
  58. United Nations. (2006). Conventions on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
  59. Valle, J. W. (2009). What mothers say about special education: From the 1960s to the present. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Valle, J. W., & Aponte, E. (2002). IDEA and collaboration: A Bakhtinian perspective on parent and professional discourse. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 469–479.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350050701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Laarhoven-Myers, T. E., Van Laarhoven, T. R., Smith, T. J., Johnson, H., & Olson, J. (2016). Promoting self-determination and transition planning using technology: Student and parent perspectives. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(2), 99–110.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414552518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal. (2006, June 6). Beasley v State of Victoria Department of Education & Training (VCAT). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2006/1050.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=Beasley
  63. Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC). (2012). Held back: The experiences of students with disabilities in Victorian schools. Retrieved from http://www.humanrightscommission.vic.gov.au/media/k2/attachments/1404-VEOHRC_HeldBack_-_StudentwithDisabilityReportW3.pdf
  64. Vlachou, A., & Papananou, I. (2015). Disabled students’ narratives about their schooling experiences. Disability & Society, 30(1), 73–86.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.982787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watkins, B. T. (2014). Reducing court-related stress through court education: Examining child witnesses, attorneys and parents. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/2228/
  66. Watson, J. (2016). The right to supported decision-making for people rarely heard. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joanne_Watson/publication/258997358_Thesis_The_right_to_supported_decision-making_for_people_rarely_heard/links/5751420a08ae17e65ec149cf.pdf
  67. Weber, M. (2013). Children with disabilities, parents without disabilities, and lawyers: Issues of life experience, affinity, and agency. In B. A. Ferri & A. Kanter (Eds.), Righting educational wrongs: Disability studies in law and education. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., & Seo, H. (2015). Promoting the self-determination and goal attainment of youth with learning disabilities and behavioral disorders. In B. G. Cook, M. Tankersley, & T. J. Landrum (Eds.), Transition of youth and young adults (pp. 173–196). Bingley: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Whitburn, B. (2016). Voice, post-structural representation and the subjectivity of ‘included’ students. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(2), 117–130.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.946497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams-Lewis, Y. R. (2014). Principal leadership that creates a school culture supportive of inclusive education for students on the autism spectrum. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://sdsu-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/138246/WilliamsLewis_sdsu_0220D_10674.pdf?sequence=1
  71. Wilson, A., Poed, S., & Byrnes, L. (2015). Full steam ahead: Facilitating the involvement of Australian students with impairments in individual planning processes through student-led program support group meetings. Special Education Perspectives, 24(1), 15–25. Retrieved from http://aase.edu.au/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/documents/SEP-Contents-Vol24-No1-18Jun15-.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options