Advertisement

Reasonable Adjustment in Assessment: The Australian Experience

  • Elizabeth DicksonEmail author
  • Joy Cumming
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explains the legislation and associated case law which underpins the right to reasonable adjustment in education for students with disabilities in Australian schools. It focuses, particularly, on obligations which arise under the Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Cth). It gives examples of the kinds of adjustment which may be made to promote equality of opportunity in the area of assessment. It also considers how the law has constructed the border between reasonable adjustment and academic integrity.

Keywords

Assessment Australian schools Reasonable adjustment Anti-discrimination law Disability Standards for Education 

References

  1. ACT Government Education & Training (ACTGET). (2013). Taskforce on students with learning difficulties. Canberra: ACT.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011, March). 4102.0 – Australian social trends. ‘Year 12 attainment’. Canberra: ACT.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Curriculum Assessment & Reporting Authority. (2013). Student diversity and the Australian curriculum. Advice for principals, schools and teachers. Sydney: ACARA.Google Scholar
  4. Beitsch, R. (2016, December). Special education case at Supreme court could prove costly for schools. Stateline. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2016/12/08/special-education-case-at-supreme-court-could-prove-costly-for-schools
  5. Brett, M., Harvey, A., Funston, A., Spicer, R., & Wood, A. (2016). The role of inherent requirement statements in Australian universities. Report for the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Curtin University.Google Scholar
  6. Camilli, G. (2013). Ongoing issues in test fairness. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 19(2–3), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cumming, J. J. (2012). Valuing students with impairments: International comparisons of practice in educational accountability. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cumming, J., & Dickson, E. (2013). Educational accountability tests, social and legal inclusion approaches to discrimination for students with disability: A national case study from Australia. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 221–239.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.730499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cumming, J., Dickson, E., & Webster, A. (2013). Reasonable adjustments in assessment: Putting law and policy into practice. International Journal of Disability, Development, & Education, 60(4), 295–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.846467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickson, E. (2012). The assessment of students with disabilities: The Australian law as to reasonable adjustment and academic integrity. International Journal of Law and Education, 17(2), 49–62.Google Scholar
  11. Dickson, E. (2014). Disability standards for education 2005 (Cth): Sword or shield for Australian students with disability. International Journal of Law and Education, 19(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
  12. Disability Discrimination Act. (1992). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/dda1992264/
  13. Forlin, C., Keen, M., & Barrett, E. (2008). The concerns of mainstream teachers: Coping with inclusivity in an Australian context. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall, L., & Patty, A. (2012, 4 July). Student loses appeal over 99.95 HSC mark. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/student-loses-appeal-over-9995-hsc-mark-20120703-21flw.html
  15. McNaught, K. (2013). The potential impacts of ‘inherent requirements’ and ‘mandatory professional reporting’ on students, particularly those with mental health concerns, registering with university disability/support services. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, 42, 25–30.Google Scholar
  16. NSW Ombudsman (NSW O). (2013). A level playing field? HSC disability provisions. Sydney: NSW O.Google Scholar
  17. O’Rourke, J., & Houghton, S. (2008). Perceptions of secondary school students with mild disabilities to the academic and social support mechanisms implemented in regular classrooms. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(3), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ofsted. (2010). The special educational needs and disability review. A statement is not enough. Manchester: Ofsted.Google Scholar
  19. The National Autistic Society. (2015). Choosing a school in England. Retrieved from http://www.autism.org.uk/about/in-education/choosing-school/england.aspx
  20. Victorian Certification and Assessment Authority. (2012). VCE chemistry assessment handbook 2010–2015. Melbourne: VCAA.Google Scholar
  21. Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC). (2012). Held back: The experiences of students with disabilities in Victorian schools. Carlton: VEOHRC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Learning Sciences Institute AustraliaAustralian Catholic UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations