Evaluation of “Method” as IT Artifacts in Soft Design Science Research: Development of Community Based E-Museum Framework Towards Sustainable Cultural Heritage Information System

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 745)

Abstract

This paper reports work on the evaluation of IT artifacts in soft design science research. We believed that socio-technical concern could draw attention as a vital component in the development of a sustainable cultural heritage information system as social-technical system. Therefore, with social-technical concerned, the soft design science methodology is refined and IT artifacts for community based e-museum framework were constructed. The IT artifacts resulting from this research include constructs, methods, models and instantiations of Community based e-museum framework components. However, the evaluation of IT artifacts presented in this paper includes evaluation criteria in terms of completeness of methods that represents the components of community based e-museum framework.

Keywords

Soft Design Science Methodology IT artifacts evaluation Community based e-museum Sustainable cultural heritage information system 

References

  1. 1.
    March, S., Smith, G.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15, 251–266 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Gengler, C., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., Bragge, J.: The design science research process: a model for producing and presenting information systems research. In: Proceedings of DESRIST 2006, Claremont, CA, pp. 83–106 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Janiesch, C.: Socio-technical perspectives on design science in IS research. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds.), Advances in Information Systems Development, pp. 127–139 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Checkland, P.B., Scholes, J.: Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: Soft design science methodology. In: Purao, S., Lyytinen, K., Song, I.-Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. ACM Digital Library (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Janiesch, C.: Socio-technical perspectives on design science in IS research. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Zupancic, J., Magyar, G., Knapp, G. (eds.) Advances in Information Systems Development, pp. 127–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mshangi, M., Nfuka, E.N., Sanga, C.: An innovative soft design science methodology for improving development of a secure information system in Tanzania using multi-layered approach. J. Inf. Secur. 8, 141–165 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Razali, S., Noor, N.L.M., Adnan, W.A.W.: Applying soft system methodology (SSM) into the design science: conceptual modeling of community based E-Museum (ComE) framework. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2701–2707 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mumford, E.: Systems Design: Ethical Tools for Ethical Change. Macmillan, London (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dasgupta, S.: Technology and Creativity. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Checkland, P., Poulter, J.: Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and Its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Wiley, Chichester (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Purao, S.: Design research in the technology of information systems: truth or dare. In: GSU Department of CIS Working Paper, Atlanta (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Razali, S., Noor, N.L.M., Adnan, W.A.W.: Towards sustainable heritage information system: conceptualization of community based e-Museum. In: International Conference on eCommerce, e-Administration, e-Society and e-Communication (eCASE) (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noor, N.L.M., Razali, S., Adnan, W.A.W.: Digital cultural heritage: community empowerment via community-based e-museum. In: 2010 International Conference on Information Society (i-Society), London, pp. 542–547 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pfeiffer, D., Niehaves, B.: Evaluation of conceptual models: a structuralist approach. In: 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005), Regensburg, Germany, pp. 1–12 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venable, J.: The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST), Claremont, California, pp. 1–18 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, B.: Design research in information systems. AISWorldNet (2008). http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm
  19. 19.
    Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modelling. MIS Q. 32(4), 839–868 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 3, 45–77 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greiffenberg, S., Schermann, M.: Requirements of information systems theories - Part 1. In: 6th International Conference Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2003), Physica, Dresden, Germany, pp. 947–968 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wynekoop, J.L., Russo, N.L.: Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods. Inf. Syst. J. 7(1), 47–65 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Soft design science research: extending the boundaries of evaluation in design science research. In: Proceedings from the 2nd International Conference on Design Science Research in IT (DESRIST), pp. 18–38 (2007). Article in proceedingsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer and Mathematical SciencesUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah AlamMalaysia

Personalised recommendations