Measuring the Quality of Humanitarian Information Products: Insights from the 2015 Nepal Earthquake

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 745)

Abstract

Information plays a critical role in humanitarian assistance. It has become a product that is shared for multiple purposes such as situational awareness, decision-making, coordination, reporting, and attracting funding. In the aftermath of sudden onset disasters, humanitarians are constrained with huge workload, time pressure, and uncertainties and thus, information products are often criticized with respect to quality issues.

In this paper, we aim at developing an empirically grounded framework that can measure the quality of information products through accuracy, objectivity, completeness, and consistency. We validate the framework with the help of practitioners and apply it to the information products of UN WFP for the 2015 Nepal earthquake response. Our analysis shows that the quality of studied information products could be improved with respect to consistency, accuracy, and objectivity. We discuss the implications of our study and propose future research directions.

Keywords

Information quality Humanitarian response Framework Case study 2015 Nepal earthquake 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all practitioners who participated in our research, and Bjørn Erik Munkvold for his comments and suggestions that allowed us to improve the quality of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Van de Walle, B., Van Den Eede, G., Muhren, W.: Humanitarian information management and systems. In: International Workshop on Mobile Information Technology for Emergency Response, pp. 12–21. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Soden, R.: Crisis informatics in the anthropocene: disasters as matters of care and concern. In: Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 93–96. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van de Walle, B., Comes, T.: On the nature of information management in complex and natural disasters. Procedia Eng. 107, 403–411 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maitland, C., Tapia, A.: Outcomes from the UN OCHA 2002 symposium & HIN workshops on best practices in humanitarian information management and exchange. Prepared for United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eppler, M.J.: Managing Information Quality: Increasing the Value of Information in Knowledge-Intensive Products and Processes. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bharosa, N., Appelman, J., Van Zanten, B., Zuurmond, A.: Identifying and confirming information and system quality requirements for multi-agency disaster management. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM 2009, Gothenborg, Sweden, 10–13 May 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seppänen, H., Virrantaus, K.: Shared situational awareness and information quality in disaster management. Saf. Sci. 77, 112–122 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van de Walle, B., Brugghemans, B., Comes, T.: Improving situation awareness in crisis response teams: an experimental analysis of enriched information and centralized coordination. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 95, 66–79 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friberg, T., Prödel, S., Koch, R.: Information quality criteria and their importance for experts in crisis situations. In: Proceedings of the 8th International ISCRAM Conference, pp. 145–149 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saaty, T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 234–281 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    UNWFP: Situation report 21.05.2015. Technical report, United Nations World Food Programme (UNWFP) (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Altay, N., Labonte, M.: Challenges in humanitarian information management and exchange: evidence from Haiti. Disasters 38(s1), S50–S72 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Comes, T., Vybornova, O., Van de Walle, B.: Bringing structure to the disaster data typhoon: an analysis of decision-makers’ information needs in the response to Haiyan. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium Series (SSS-15) on Structured Data for Humanitarian Technologies: Perfect Fit or Overkill, pp. 23–25 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cook, A.D., Shrestha, M.: International response to 2015 Nepal earthquake: lessons and observations. Technical report, RSIS NTS Report (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baharmand, H., Boersma, K., Meesters, K., Mulder, F., Wolbers, J.: A multidisciplinary perspective on supporting community disaster resilience in Nepal. In: ISCRAM (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meesters, K., Van de Walle, B.: Serious gaming for user centered innovation and adoption of disaster response information systems. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag. (IJISCRAM) 6(2), 1–15 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ICTUniversity of AgderGrimstadNorway
  2. 2.The Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementTU DelftDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations