Solvency II – A BPM Application

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 745)

Abstract

Solvency II brings challenging requirements for insurance companies concerning the amount and periodicity of the reported information. Hence, it is difficult for an insurer to comply with such requirements without mapping and organizing the flow of information regarding the process of Solvency II.

This paper contributes to literature manifold: we provide an assessment of Information Management needs for a medium-sized Portuguese insurance firm - CA Seguros - regarding Solvency II; in addition, we map and document the whole process of Information Management for quantitative reporting (Pillars 1 and 3) on Solvency II. Hence, we assess the possibility of mapping a firm’s Solvency II process with a business process model using Event-driven Process Chains.

Keywords

Solvency II Business Process Management Business Process Modeling Even-driven process chains 

References

  1. 1.
    Institute and Faculty of Actuaries: Solvency II – General Insurance (2016). https://www.actuaries.org.uk/…/solvency-ii-general-insurance. Accessed 25 Sept 2017
  2. 2.
    KPMG: Solvency II: A closer look at the evolving process transforming the global insurance industry (2011). http://ivan-shamaev.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/solvency-II_kpmg_english.pdf. Accessed 04 May 2017
  3. 3.
    ASF: Solvência II – Enquadramento (2017). http://www.asf.com.pt/NR/exeres/7BF5C5A6-9B7E-4516-B51F-727E24F69E8D.htm. Accessed 04 Mar 2017
  4. 4.
    Bonsón, E., Cortijo, V., Escobar, T., Flores, F., Monreal, S.: Solvency II and XBRL: new rules and technologies in insurance supervision. J. Financ. Regul. Compliance 18(2), 144–157 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    EIOPA: Understanding public disclosure under Solvency II (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    EIOPA: Solvency II – Reporting and disclosure (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IVASS: Solvency II – The new prudential regulation on the insurance sector: a simplified guide (2016). https://www.ivass.it/pubblicazioni-e-statistiche/pubblicazioni/altre-pubblicazioni/2016/guida-solvency-ii/SolvencyII_Guide_EN.pdf?language_id=3. Accessed 04 May 2017
  8. 8.
    Fischer, R., Aier, S., Winter, R.: A federated approach to enterprise architecture model maintenance. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. 2(2), 14–22 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ko, R.K.: A computer scientist’s introductory guide to business process management (BPM). Crossroads 15(4), 4 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: In: Design research in information systems, pp. 9–22, Springer, US (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mendling, J.: Business process management. In: Metrics for Process Models (pp. 1–15). Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zairi, M.: Business process management: a boundaryless approach to modern competitiveness. Bus. Process Manage. J. 3(1), 64–80 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frederiks, P.J., Van der Weide, T.P.: Information modeling: The process and the required competencies of its participants. Data Knowl. Eng. 58(1), 4–20 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weske, M.: Business process management architectures. In: Business Process Management, pp. 333–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: current issues and future challenges. In: International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Georgakopoulos, D., Tsalgatidou, A.: Technology and tools for comprehensive business process lifecycle management. In: Workflow Management Systems and Interoperability, pp. 356–395. Springer, Heidelberg, (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Becker, J., Rosemann, M., Von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of business process modeling. In: Business Process Management, pp. 30–49. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scheer, A. W., Thomas, O., Adam, O.: Process modeling using event-driven process chains. Process-aware information systems, pp. 119–146 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Dongen, B., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring similarity between business process models. In: Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, pp. 405–419. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.: Formalization and verification of event-driven process chains. Inf. Softw. Technol. 41(10), 639–650 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ungan, M.: Towards a better understanding of process documentation. TQM Mag. 18(4), 400–409 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ADVANCE/CSG/Instituto Superior de Economia e GestãoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Superior de Economia e GestãoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations