Advertisement

Frequency, Quefrency, and Phase in Practice

  • Jérôme Sueur
Part of the Use R! book series (USE R)

Abstract

The options to compute, display, and describe the frequency spectrum are reviewed. This includes the use of different frequency and amplitude scales, the automatic detection of frequency peaks in particular the fundamental frequency peak and the dominant frequency peak, the identification of harmonics series, the principle of symbolic aggregate approximation, and the use of other spectrum parametrizations. The quefrency cepstrum and the phase portrait are also introduced.

Audio files:Loxodonta_africana.wavtico.wavpeewit.wavsheep.wavorni.wavpellucens.wav

References

  1. Adler D, Murdoch D (2016) rgl: 3D visualization device system (OpenGL). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgl, R package
  2. Aldersley A, Champneys A, Homer M, Robert D (2016) Quantitative analysis of harmonic convergence in mosquito auditory interactions. J R Soc Interface 13:20151007Google Scholar
  3. Bennet-Clark HC (1999) Which Qs to choose: questions of quality in bioacoustics? Bioacoustics 9:351–359Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson JR (1922) Notes on the theory of modulation. Proc Institute Radio Eng 10:57–64Google Scholar
  6. Cazelles B (2004) Symbolic dynamics for identifying similarity between rhythms of ecological time series. Ecol Lett 7:755–763Google Scholar
  7. Chowning JM (1973) The synthesis of complex audio spectra by means of frequency modulation. J Audio Eng Soc 21:526–531Google Scholar
  8. Fitch W, Neubauer J, Herzel H (2002) Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim Behav 63:407–418Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert J, Dalmont JP, Potier R, Reby D (2014) Is nonlinear propagation responsible for the brassiness of elephant trumpet calls? Acta Acustica United Acustica 100:734–738Google Scholar
  10. Kantz H, Schreiber T (2003) Non linear time series analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Eco Inform 12:50–67Google Scholar
  12. Lauterborn W, Parlitz U (1988) Methods of chaos physics and their application to acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 84:1975–1993Google Scholar
  13. Lin J, Keogh E, Lonardi S, Chiu B (2003) A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGMOD workshop on research issues in data mining and knowledge discovery, DMKD ’03. ACM, New York, pp 2–11Google Scholar
  14. Mezquida DA, Martinez JL (2009) Platform for beehives monitoring based on sound analysis. a perpetual warehouse for swarm’s daily activity. Span J Agric Res 7:824–828Google Scholar
  15. Ramsay JO, Silverman BW (2005) Functional data analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Rice AN, Land BR, Bass AH (2011) Nonlinear acoustic complexity in a fish “two-voice” system. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 278:3762–3768Google Scholar
  17. Senin P (2015) jmotif: tools for time series analysis based on symbolic aggregate discretization. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jmotif, R package
  18. Tokuda IT (2017) Nonlinear dynamics and temporal analysis. In: Comparative bioacoustics: an overview. Bentham Science, Oak Park, pp 336–357Google Scholar
  19. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2. Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Sueur
    • 1
  1. 1.Muséum National d’Histoire naturelleParisFrance

Personalised recommendations