The Effects of Companies’ Reverse Logistics Motivations on Their Reverse Logistics Networks

  • Metehan Feridun SorkunEmail author
  • Meltem Onay
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)


The aim of this paper is to show how the differences in the motivations of companies to implement reverse logistics affect their reverse logistics networks. Effective reverse logistics management facilitates the accomplishment of many goals for companies, such as reducing operational costs, increasing customer satisfaction, boosting brand value, and meeting the requirements of environmental regulations. However, the prominence of these motivations may vary according to sector. In some sectors, the strict government regulations in force may compel companies to implement reverse logistics, while in others, consumers may be highly conscious of the environmental-friendly production, encouraging companies to engage into reverse logistics activities. This situation calls for studies that analyse the differences in companies’ motivations to implement reverse logistics, and explain in turn how these differences shape their reverse logistics networks. Hence, this study has adopted a multiple-case study analysing reverse logistics activities of four companies each representing one of the following sectors: textile, battery, building materials, and food. Such cross-sectoral analysis enables an examination of the reverse logistics network design according to different motivation factors. The results reveal that different RL motivations have an impact on three reverse logistics design issues: the collection of returns, the location to inspect returns, and forward/backward integration on RL networks. This study explicates the theoretical and practical implications of these results as well.


Reverse logistics Logistics network design Drivers of reverse logistics Product recovery Recycling Product return Reverse product flow Reverse supply chain 


  1. Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., & Murtaza, Q. (2015). A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 97, 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chopra, S. (2003). Designing the distribution network in a supply chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Das, K., & Chowdhury, A. H. (2012). Designing a reverse logistics network for optimal collection, recovery and quality-based product-mix planning. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daugherty, P. J., Myers, M. B., & Richey, R. G. (2002). Information support for reverse logistics: the influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demirel, E., Demirel, N., & ve Gökçen, H. (2016). A mixed integer linear programming model to optimize reverse logistics activities of end-of-life vehicles in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2101–2113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fleischmann, M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Beullens, P., & Dekker, R. (2004). Reverse logistics network design. In R. Dekker, M. Fleischmann, K. Inderfurth, & L. N. Van Wassenhove (Eds.), Reverse logistics (pp. 65–94). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghayebloo, S., Tarokh, M. J., Venkatadri, U., & Diallo, C. (2015). Developing a bi-objective model of the closed-loop supply chain network with green supplier selection and disassembly of products: the impact of parts reliability and product greenness on the recovery network. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 76–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jack, E. P., Powers, T. L., & Skinner, L. (2010). Reverse logistics capabilities: Antecedents and cost savings. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(3), 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jayaraman, V., & Luo, Y. (2007). Creating competitive advantages through new value creation: A reverse logistics perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(2), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar, V., & Christodoulopoulou, A. (2014). Sustainability and branding: An integrated perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, D. H., & Dong, M. (2009). Dynamic network design for reverse logistics operations under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(1), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Mutha, A., & Pokharel, S. (2009). Strategic network design for reverse logistics and remanufacturing using new and old product modules. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(1), 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nikolaou, I. E., Evangelinos, K. I., & Allan, S. (2013). A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pishvaee, M. S., Farahani, R. Z., & Dullaert, W. (2010). A memetic algorithm for bi-objective integrated forward/reverse logistics network design. Computers & Operations Research, 37(6), 1100–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramezani, M., Bashiri, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A new multi-objective stochastic model for a forward/reverse logistic network design with responsiveness and quality level. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1), 328–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. S. (1999). Going backwards: Reverse logistics trends and practices. Pittsburgh, PA: RLEC Press.Google Scholar
  19. Savaskan, R. C., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers. Management Science, 52(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shen, Z. J. M., & Daskin, M. S. (2005). Trade-offs between customer service and cost in integrated supply chain design. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 7(3), 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Silva, D. A. L., Renó, G. W. S., Sevegnani, G., Sevegnani, T. B., & Truzzi, O. M. S. (2013). Comparison of disposable and returnable packaging: A case study of reverse logistics in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sorkun, M. F. (2018). The hierarchy of motivations turning manufacturers’ attention to reverse logistics. Ege Academic Review, 18(2).
  24. Sorkun, M. F., & Onay, M. (2016). Ürün modülerliğinin ters lojistik süreçleri üzerinden tedarik zinciri stratejilerine etkisi. Sosyal Ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 41–57.Google Scholar
  25. Srivastava, S. K. (2008). Network design for reverse logistics. Omega, 36(4), 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thierry, M., Salomon, M., Van Nunen, J., & Van Wassenhove, L. (1995). Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review, 37(2), 114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ye, F., Zhao, X., Prahinski, C., & Li, Y. (2013). The impact of institutional pressures, top managers’ posture and reverse logistics on performance—Evidence from China. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(1), 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business Administrationİzmir University of EconomicsİzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Manisa Celal Bayar UniversityManisaTurkey

Personalised recommendations