Neo-Liberal Effects on Time Perception: When “Time Is Money” Turns into “Hybrid Time”

  • Mira MosheEmail author


This chapter presents the effects of neo-liberalist fundamentals on time perceptions. These concepts emphasize the importance of competition on the open market, economic growth, and development, in addition to efficient apportionment of resources and minimal government intervention in economic and social matters. Thus, they subordinate all aspects of life to market logic and also influence the temporal perceptions of both individuals and organizations. For example, it is possible to identify neo-liberal patterns in attempts to (a) effectively manage time; (b) shape and control the future; (c) restrict spontaneous time; and (d) develop squeezed time and speeded-up time. It is also possible to identify how neo-liberalism leads to the development of hybrid time, which links various cultural components and results in a blurring of these components, including (a) synchronic and polychromic time; (b) flexible time; (c) real time and timeless time; and (d) time for a break.


  1. Abram, S., & Weszkalnys, G. (2011). Introduction: Anthropologies of Planning-Temporality, Imagination, and Ethnography. Focaal, 2011(61), 3–18.Google Scholar
  2. Aho, K. A. (2007). Acceleration and Time Pathologies: The Critique of Psychology in Heidegger’s Beiträge. Time & Society, 16(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  3. Birch, K., & Mykhnenko, V. (2010). Introduction: A World Turned Right Way Up. In K. Birch & V. Mykhnenko (Eds.), The Rise and Fall of Neoliberalism: The Collapse of an Economic Order? (pp. 1–20). London/New York: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, E., & Ritter, M. (1977). Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to Its Dialectics. New German Critique, 11, 22–38.Google Scholar
  5. Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid Masculinities: New Directions in the Sociology of Men and Masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258.Google Scholar
  6. Burke, P. (2009). Cultural Hybridity. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (2000). End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age, Economy, Society and Culture (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Chung, L. Y., & Lim, S. S. (2005). From Monochronic to Mobilechronic. Temporality in the Era of Mobile Communication. In A Sense of Place: The Global and the Local in Mobile Communication (pp. 267–282). Wien: Passagen.Google Scholar
  12. Ciulla, J. (2000). The Working Life: The Promise and Betrayal of Modern Work. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  14. Cunliffe, A. L., Luhman, J. T., & Boje, D. M. (2004). Narrative Temporality: Implications for Organizational Research. Organization Studies, 25(2), 261–286.Google Scholar
  15. De Ruijter, E., & Van der Lippe, T. (2007). Effects of Job Features on Domestic Outsourcing as a Strategy for Combining Paid and Domestic Work. Work and Occupations, 34(2), 205–230.Google Scholar
  16. De Ruijter, E., & Van Der Lippe, T. (2009). Getting Outside Help: How Trust Problems Explain Household Differences in Domestic Outsourcing in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 30(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
  17. Demir, T., & Ben-Zadok, E. (2007). Politically Driven Regulations and Enforcement: Monitoring Kurd and Fundamentalist Broadcasts in Turkey. Administration & Society, 39(2), 262–293.Google Scholar
  18. Denhardt, J. V., & Campbell, K. B. (2006). The Role of Democratic Values in Transformational Leadership. Administration & Society, 38(5), 556–572.Google Scholar
  19. Dess, G. G., Rasheed, A. M., McLaughlin, K. J., & Priem, R. L. (1995). The New Corporate Architecture. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(3), 7–18.Google Scholar
  20. DiRomualdo, A., & Gurbaxani, V. (1998). Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 67.Google Scholar
  21. Durant, R. F. (2007). Toxic Politics, Organizational Change, and the “Greening” of the US Military: Toward a Polity-Centered Perspective. Administration & Society, 39(3), 409–446.Google Scholar
  22. Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2007). Trust in Complex Decision-Making Networks: A Theoretical and Empirical Exploration. Administration & Society, 39(1), 25–50.Google Scholar
  23. Eglene, O., & Dawes, S. S. (2006). Challenges and Strategies for Conducting International Public Management Research. Administration & Society, 38(5), 596–622.Google Scholar
  24. Farrell, A., & Geist-Martin, P. (2005). Communicating Social Health: Perceptions of Wellness at Work. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 543–592.Google Scholar
  25. Fetveit, A. (2011). Mutable Temporality in and Beyond the Music Video: An Aesthetic of Post-Production. In E. Røssaak (Ed.), Between Stillness and Motion: Film, Photography, Algorithms (pp. 159–186). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Frello, B. (2012). Cultural Hybridity. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Gamble, A. (2001). Neo-liberalism. Capital & Class, 25(3), 127–134.Google Scholar
  29. Gasparini, G. (2004). Anticipation and the Surprises of Everyday Life. Social Science Information, 43(3), 339–348.Google Scholar
  30. Gilley, K. M., & Rasheed, A. (2000). Making More by Doing Less: An Analysis of Outsourcing and Its Effects on Firm Performance. Journal of Management, 26(4), 763–790.Google Scholar
  31. Golish, T. D., & Powell, K. A. (2003). Ambiguous Loss’: Managing the Dialectics of Grief Associated with Premature Birth. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(3), 309–334.Google Scholar
  32. Gray, J. R. (1999). A Bias Toward Short-Term Thinking in Threat-Related Negative Emotional States. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 65–75.Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton, P. (2002). From Industrial to Information Society. In T. Jordan & S. Pile (Eds.), Social Change (pp. 95–138). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Hansen, M. F. (2016). Telling Time: Representations of Ruins in the Grotesques of Sixteenth-Century Italy. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 8(1), 30402.Google Scholar
  35. Harvey, D. (2007a). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Harvey, D. (2007b). Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 21–44.Google Scholar
  37. Hassan, R. (2003). Network Time and the New Knowledge Epoch. Time & Society, 12(2–3), 226–241.Google Scholar
  38. Hassan, R. (2009). Empires of Speed: Time and the Acceleration of Politics and Society (Vol. 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  39. Held, M., & Nutzinger, H. G. (1998). Nonstop Acceleration: The Economic Logic of Development Towards the Nonstop Society. Time & Society, 7(2–3), 209–221.Google Scholar
  40. Hochschild, A. (1997). The Time Bind. New York: Metropolitan.Google Scholar
  41. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Hollinger, M. F., & Allen, D. S. (2008). U.S. Patent No. 7,472,181. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  43. Hope, W. (2006). Global Capitalism and the Critique of Real Time. Time & Society, 15(2–3), 275–302.Google Scholar
  44. Iparraguirre, G. (2016). Time, Temporality and Cultural Rhythmics: An Anthropological Case Study. Time & Society, 25(3), 613–633.Google Scholar
  45. Jarvis, H. (2005). Moving to London Time. Household Co-ordination and the Infrastructure of Everyday Life. Time & Society, 14, 133–154.Google Scholar
  46. Jeh-Hong, R. (2004). Naturalizing Landscapes and the Politics of Hybridity: Gwanghwamun to Cheonggyecheon. Korea Journal, 44(3), 8–33.Google Scholar
  47. Jessop, B., & Sum, N. L. (2006). Beyond the Regulation Approach: Putting Capitalist Economies in Their Place. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Jones, O. (2011). Lunar–Solar Rhythmpatterns: Towards the Material Cultures of Tides. Environment and Planning A, 43(10), 2285–2303.Google Scholar
  49. Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values: An Inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.Google Scholar
  50. Kalu, K. N. (2005). Competing Ideals and the Public Agenda in Medicare Reform: The “Garbage Can” Model Revisited. Administration & Society, 37(1), 23–56.Google Scholar
  51. Knights, D., & Yakhlef, A. (2005). Time, Self and Reified Artefacts. Time & Society, 14(2–3), 283–302.Google Scholar
  52. Knott, J. H., & McCarthy, D. (2007). Policy Venture Capital: Foundations, Government Partnerships, and Child Care Programs. Administration & Society, 39(3), 319–353.Google Scholar
  53. Koliba, C. J., & Lathrop, J. (2007). Inquiry as Intervention: Employing Action Research to Surface Intersubjective Theories-in-Use and Support an Organization’s Capacity to Learn. Administration & Society, 39(1), 51–76.Google Scholar
  54. Kõresaar, E., & Harro-Loit, H. (2010). Revising Time in Cultural Research. Trames, 4, 303–306.Google Scholar
  55. Laguerre, M. (2003). Urban Multiculturalism and Globalization in New York City: An Analysis of Diasporic Temporalities. Gewerbestrasse: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Lea, S., Auburn, T., & Kibblewhite, K. (1999). Working with Sex Offenders: The Perceptions and Experiences of Professionals and Paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(1), 103–119.Google Scholar
  58. Lens, V. (2007). Administrative Justice in Public Welfare Bureaucracies: When Citizens (Don’t) Complain. Administration & Society, 39(3), 382–408.Google Scholar
  59. Maconachie, G. (1992). From Bureaucrat to Professional: Skill and Work in the Commonwealth Public Service. Journal of Industrial Relations, 35(2), 221–241.Google Scholar
  60. Matheson, C. (2007). In Praise of Bureaucracy? A Dissent from Australia. Administration & Society, 39(2), 233–261.Google Scholar
  61. McMenemy, D. (2009). Rise and Demise of Neoliberalism: Time to Reassess the Impact on Public Libraries. Library Review, 58(6), 400–404.Google Scholar
  62. Miller, D. (2010). How Neoliberalism Got Where It Is: Elite Planning, Corporate Lobbying and the Release of the Free Market. In K. Birch & V. Mykhnenko (Eds.), The Rise and Fall of Neoliberalism The Collapse of an Economic Order? (pp. 60–76). London/New York: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  63. Mortimer, M. J., & McLeod, S. D. (2006). Managing Montana’s Trust Land Old-Growth Forests: Practical Challenges in Implementing Scientific Policy. Administration & Society, 38(4), 447–471.Google Scholar
  64. Moshe, M. (2012). Media Time Squeezing: The Privatization of the Media Time Sphere. Television & New Media, 13(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
  65. Moshe, M. (2014). “I’m on a break…” The Contribution of Taking a Break to Emotional Coping. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad, 6(16), 66.Google Scholar
  66. Moshe, M. (2015). Taking a Break. Some Thoughts About Media Consumption. Kome: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 3(1), 66–80.Google Scholar
  67. Moshe, M. (2016). Temporal Love: Temporality and Romantic Relationships. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. O. L. (2010). CEO Personality, Strategic Flexibility, and Firm Performance: The Case of the Indian Business Process Outsourcing Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073.Google Scholar
  69. Nazarian, L. F., Mechaber, J., Charney, E., & Coulter, M. P. (1974). Effect of a Mailed Appointment Reminder on Appointment Keeping. Pediatrics, 53(3), 349–352.Google Scholar
  70. Odih, P. (2003). Gender, Work and Organization in the Time/Space Economy of ‘Just-in-Time’ Labour. Time & Society, 12(2–3), 293–314.Google Scholar
  71. Peters, M. A. (2001). Poststructuralism, Marxism, and Neoliberalism: Between Theory and Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  72. Powell, G. E., Lane, M. T., & Indseth, R. (2006). U.S. Patent No. 7,127,412. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google Scholar
  73. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 63, 79–91.Google Scholar
  74. Quinn, J. B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Quinn, J. B. (1999). Strategic Outsourcing: Leveraging Knowledge Capabilities. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 9.Google Scholar
  76. Rasmussen, L. B., & Wangel, A. (2007). Work in the Virtual Enterprise-Creating Identities, Building Trust, and Sharing Knowledge. AI & Society, 21(1–2), 184–199.Google Scholar
  77. Reisch, L. A. (2001). Time and Wealth. Time & Society, 10(2–3), 367–385.Google Scholar
  78. Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rodríguez, C., Langley, A., Béland, F., & Denis, J. L. (2007). Governance, Power, and Mandated Collaboration in an Interorganizational Network. Administration & Society, 39(2), 150–193.Google Scholar
  80. Rosa, H., & Scheuerman, W. E. (2010). High-Speed Society. Pennsylvania. USA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Scharff, C. (2016). The Psychic Life of Neoliberalism: Mapping the Contours of Entrepreneurial Subjectivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(6), 107–122.Google Scholar
  82. Schor, J. B. (1992). The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  83. Soldatic, K. (2013). Appointment Time: Disability and Neoliberal Workfare Temporalities. Critical Sociology, 39(3), 405–419.Google Scholar
  84. Somers, M. R., & Block, F. (2005). From Poverty to Perversity: Ideas, Markets, and Institutions Over 200 Years of Welfare Debate. American Sociological Review, 70, 260–287.Google Scholar
  85. Southerton, D. (2003). ‘Squeezing Time’ Allocating Practices, Coordinating Networks and Scheduling Society. Time & Society, 12(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
  86. Southerton, D., & Tomlinson, M. (2005). ‘Pressed for Time’–The Differential Impacts of a ‘Time Squeeze’. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 215–239.Google Scholar
  87. Steedman, I. (2003). Consumption Takes Time: Implications for Economic Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Strier, R., Surkis, T., & Biran, D. (2008). Neo-liberalism: Bottom-Up Counter-Narratives. International Social Work, 51(4), 493–508.Google Scholar
  89. Turner, B. S., Abercrombie, N., & Hill, S. (2014). Sovereign Individuals of Capitalism (RLE Social Theory). New York: NY.Google Scholar
  90. Van der Lippe, T., Tijdens, K., & De Ruijter, E. (2004). Outsourcing of Domestic Tasks and Time-Saving Effects. Journal of Family Issues, 25(2), 216–240.Google Scholar
  91. Van Loon, J. (2000). Imminent Immanence: the Time-Politics of Speed and the Management of Decline. Time & Society, 9(2–3), 347–353.Google Scholar
  92. West, J. D., Watts, R. E., Trepal, H. C., Wester, K. L., & Lewis, T. F. (2001). Opening Space for Client Reflection: A Postmodern Consideration. The Family Journal, 9(4), 431–437.Google Scholar
  93. Yang, K. (2006). Trust and Citizen Involvement Decisions: Trust in Citizens, Trust in Institutions, and Propensity to Trust. Administration & Society, 38(5), 573–595.Google Scholar
  94. Ylijoki, O. H., & Mäntylä, H. (2003). Conflicting Time Perspectives in Academic Work. Time & Society, 12(1), 55–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ariel UniversityArielIsrael

Personalised recommendations