Population: Notions, Theories and Policies

Chapter

Abstract

Diverse views on population have been expressed throughout the ages. Far back in history, Confucius is known to have been concerned with population growth and loss of productivity and Greek philosophers with concepts of optimum population and social welfare. Some thinkers were concerned with numbers and density of human population in relation to their environment, their position in the food chain, and availability of subsistence resources (Cragg and Pirie 1955; Coleman 1985; Yusuf et al. 2014). Some views involve a wider general scope and interest that deal with past and future development of the world’s society, while others tend to focus more on demographic factors.

References

  1. Arnold, F. S., Bulatao, R. A., Buripakdi, C., Chung, B. J., Fwacett, J. T., Iritani, T., et al. (1975). The value of children: A cross-national study. Honolulu: East-West Population Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Caldwell, J. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell, J. (1997). Global fertility transition: The need for a unifying theory. Population and Development Review, 23(4), 803–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldwell, J. (2004). Demographic theory: A long view. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1995). How many people can the earth support? New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, D. (1985). Population regulation: A long-range view. In D. Coleman & R. Schofield (Eds.), The state of population theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Cowgill, G. L. (1975). On causes and consequences of ancient and modern population changes. American Anthropologist, 77(3), 505–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cragg, J. B., & Pirie, N. W. (1955). The numbers of man and animals. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, K. (1945). The world demographic transition. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 237, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29(4), 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrlich, P. R. (1969). The population bomb. Ballantine.Google Scholar
  12. Freedman, R., Easterlin, R., Menken, J., Willis, R., Lapham, R., & Bulatao, R. (1983). A framework for the study of fertility determinants. In R. Bulatao & R. Lee (Eds.), Determinants in fertility decline in developing countries (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hara, T. (2015). A shrinking society: Post-demographic transition in Japan. Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  15. Kurihara, K. K. (1961). Introduction to Keynesian dynamics. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, R. (1986). Malthus and Boserup: A dynamic synthesis. In D. Coleman & R. Schofield (Eds.), The state of population theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Lele, U., & Stone, S. W. (1989). Population pressure, the environment and agricultural intensification—Variations on the Boserup hypothesis. World Bank: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  18. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In K. M. Oppenheim & A. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries: 17–62 (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, W. A. (1963). The theory of economic growth. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Livi-Bacci, M. (1989). A concise history of world population. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  21. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malthus, T. R. (1970). An essay on the principle of population and a summary view of the principle of population. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Marquette, C. (1997). Turning but not toppling Malthus: Boserupian theory of population and environment relationships. WP 1997:16. Bergen: CHR. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1958). Selected works (Vol. 2). Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing Houses.Google Scholar
  25. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits of growth. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  26. Mill, J. S. (1970). Principles of political economy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. Nag, M. (1973). Anthropology and population; problems and perspectives. Population Studies, 27(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ray, D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rostow, W. W. (1962). The stages of economic growth: A non-communistic manifesto. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sauvy, A. (1974). General theory of population. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  31. Schultz, T. (1986). The value and allocation of time in high-income countries: Implications for fertility. In D. Kingsley, M. Bernstem, & R. Ricardo-Campbell (Eds.), Below-replacement fertility in industrial societies: Causes, consequences, policies. Population and development review, (Supplement 12, pp. 87–108).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  33. Stern, N. H. (2007). The economics and climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swanson, D. A., Tedrow, L., & Baker, J. (2016). Exploring stable population concepts from the perspective of cohort change ratios: Estimating the time to stability and intrinsic r from initial information and components of change. In R. Schoen (Ed.), Dynamic demographic analysis (pp. 227–258). Dordrecht: Springer B. V. Press.Google Scholar
  35. Thompson, W. S. (1929). Population. The American Journal of Sociology, 34, 959–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. United Nations (UN). (2013). World population policies. New York.Google Scholar
  37. United Nations (UN). (2017). World population prospects—The 2017 revision (Vol. I). New York.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2015). Human development report 2015. New York.Google Scholar
  39. Van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–57.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, J. W. (1998). The theory of preindustrial population dynamics—Demography, economy, and well-being in Malthusian systems. Current Anthropology, 39(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yusuf, F., Martins, J. M., & Swanson, D. A. (2014). Methods of demographic analysis. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing and ManagementMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of California RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations