Advertisement

Nymphs and Ritual Bathing

  • Jules Janick
  • Arthur O. Tucker
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

Illustrations of similar-appearing, curvaceous, petite women (or nymphs) with blonde hair in various styles, bathing or cavorting in green pools connected by tubes suggestive of plumbing or vascular systems, are among the most bizarre features of the Voynich Codex. The bathing images are reminiscent of both Western and Aztec art. The plumbing suggests gynecological allusions such a fallopian tubes or ovaries. The nymphs are often shown in an explicit frontal view. Rear views are not found. Often, they are depicted carrying various objects including a crucifix, a large metallic ring or collar with a knob or nub, a torpedo-like object, sticks, or balls. The large ring suggests the iron collar of subjugation used by the Spanish, and the oblong, torpedo-shaped object resembles the pear of anguish, a gruesome torture device. The bathing nymphs suggest a symbolic example of ritual bathing. There are many bathing images in Aztec illustrations and abundant archeological remains of baths and bathhouses in Aztec culture. The bathing scenes represent a fusion of European and Aztec customs, suggesting a Western-trained artist with Aztec sensibilities.

Keywords

Aztec Iron collar Nudity Nymphs Pear of anguish Plumbing Pools Ritual bathing Voynich 

Literature Cited

  1. Anonymous. 1996. Rare documents shed light on grisly Mexican Inquisition. 1 April 2017.Google Scholar
  2. De Sahagún, B. 1981. Florentine Codex. General history of the things of New Spain. Book 2—The ceremonies. Trans. C.E. Dibble and A.J.O. Anderson. Salt Lake City: Univ. Utah Press.Google Scholar
  3. De Sollar, C. 2005. The beautiful woman in medieval Iberia: Rhetoric, cosmetics, and evolution. PhD thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia.Google Scholar
  4. Granziera, P. 2005. Huaxtepec: The sacred garden of an Aztec Emperor. Landscape Research 30 (1): 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kennedy, G., and R. Churchill. 2006. The Voynich manuscript: The mysterious code that has defied interpretation for centuries. Rochester: Inner Tradition.Google Scholar
  6. Milbrath, S. 2013. Heaven and earth in ancient Mexico: Astronomy and seasonal cycles in the Codex Borgia. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Strong, L.C. 1945. Anthony Askham, the author of the Voynich manuscript. Science 191: 608–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Strong, L.C., and E.L. McCawley. 1947. A verification of a hitherto unknown prescription of the 16th century. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 21: 898–904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Taiz, L., and S.L. Taiz. 2011. The biological section of the Voynich manuscript: A textbook of physiology. Chronica Horticulturae 51 (2): 19–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticulture & Landscape ArchitecturePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture & Natural ResourcesDelaware State UniversityDoverUSA

Personalised recommendations