Advertisement

The Voynich Codex

  • Jules Janick
  • Arthur O. Tucker
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

The Voynich Codex consists of 102 folios, each composed of two pages (recto and verso), but also includes pasted pages referred to as foldouts. Adjusting for 14 missing folios and multiple pages in the foldouts, the work is equivalent to about 262 pages. By convention, the work is divided into sections referred to as: Herbal (131 plant images plus text), Pharmaceutical (228 images of plants or plant parts with apothecary jars), Balneological (nude nymphs singly or in groups, many cavorting in pools with strange plumbing), Astrological (signs of the zodiac surrounded by nymphs), Cosmological (magic circles including combinations of the sun and the moon, planets, and stars), and Recipe (pages of text that may be medicinal recipes, poems, or incantations). The illustrations have a limited palette of blue, red, green, and brown. Carbon dating of the vellum is early fifteenth century, but the date of the text and illustrations remains unknown.

Keywords

Astrology Carbon dating Cosmology Folio Herbal Magic circles Medicinal recipes Pigments Voynich 

Literature Cited

  1. Anonymous. 1550–1600. Marquesado del Valle Codex. http://www.wdl.org/en/item/9681/. 7 July 2013.
  2. ———. 1576. Codex Aubin/Códice Aubin 1576/Códice de 1576/Historia de la nación mexicana/Histoire mexicaine. Mexico. http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/search_the_collection_database/search_object_details.aspx?objectid=3008812&partid=1&searchText=Aubin+Codex&currentPage=1. 28 Jan 2013.
  3. Berdan, F.F., and P.R. Anawalt. 1997. The essential Codex Mendoza. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bridson, D., and L. Forman. 1992. The herbarium handbook. London: Kew.Google Scholar
  5. Chávez Orozco, L. 1947. Codice osuna. Mexico: Ediciones del Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.Google Scholar
  6. Clayton, M., L. Guerrini, and A. de Ávila. 2009. Flora: The Aztec herbal. London: Royal Collections Enterprises.Google Scholar
  7. Clemens, R., ed. 2016. The Voynich manuscript. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dale, J.D.H. 1875. The sacristan’s manual. 3rd ed. London: T. Booker.Google Scholar
  9. Drey, R. 1978. Apothecary jars. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  10. Emmart, E.W. 1940. The Badianus manuscript. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gravier, M.G. 2011. Sahagún’s codex and book design in the indigenous context. In Colors between two worlds, ed. G. Wolf and J. Connors, 156–119. Milan: The Florentine Codex of Barnardino de Sahagún. Officina Libraria.Google Scholar
  12. Griffenhagen, G., and M. Bogard. 1999. History of drug containers and their labels. Madison: American Institute of the History of Pharmacy.Google Scholar
  13. Hind, A. 1963. A history of engraving & etching from the 15th century to the year 1914. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Hirshfeld, A. 2009. Eureka man: The life and legacy of Archimedes. New York: Walker & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Huson, P. 2004. Mystical origins of the tarot, from ancient roots to modern usage. Rochester: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
  16. Janus, O. 2012. Album: A priest who performed black magic. Live Science. http://www.livescience.com/22964-calderon-priest-black-magic.html. 12 Mar 2017.
  17. Kennedy, G., and R. Churchill. 2006. The Voynich manuscript. Rochester: Inner Traditions First published in 2004 by Orion press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Kerpel, D.M. 2014. The colors of the new world: Artists, materials, and the creation of the Florentine codex. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Luján, L.L., and G. Chiari. 2012. Color in monumental Mexica sculpture. Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics 61 (62): 330–342.Google Scholar
  20. Mackenzie, D. 1997. A manual of manuscript transcription for the dictionary of the old Spanish language. 5th ed. rev. R. Harris-Northall. Madison: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
  21. Manly, J.J. 1921. The most mysterious manuscript in the world. Did Roger Bacon write and has the key been found. Harper’s Monthly Magazine 143 (July): 186–197.Google Scholar
  22. McCrone Associates. 2009. Materials analysis of the Voynich manuscript analysis. Project MA475613. beinecke.library.yale.edu/sites/default/files/voynich_analysis.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  23. Mottana, A., R. Crespi, and G. Liborio. 1978. Simon & Schuster’s guide to rocks and minerals. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  24. Nadal, L. F., F. S. Olguín, and L. Navarijo. 2007. Un excepcional mosaico de plumaria Azteca: El Tapacáliz del Museo Nacional de Antropología. Estudio de Cultura Náhuatl (México: UNAM Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas) 38:85–100.Google Scholar
  25. Naumova, M.M., and S.A. Pisareva. 1994. A note on the use of blue and green copper compounds in paintings. Studies in Conservation 39: 277–283.Google Scholar
  26. Netz, R., and W. Noel. 2007. The Archimedes codex. London: Westfield and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  27. Newberry Library. 2007a. The Aztecs and the making of Colonial Mexico: Christianizing the Nzahua. Bernardino de Sahagún, Ejercicio en Lengua Mexicana, Central Mexico, 1574. http://publications.newberry.org/aztecs/s3i5.html. 12 Mar 2017.
  28. ———. 2007b. The Aztecs and the making of Colonial Mexico: Christianizing the Nzahua. Registry of Matrimony from Tlatelolco, Mexico City: 1632–1633. http://publications.newberry.org/aztecs/s4i12.html. 12 Mar 2017.
  29. O’Brien, W.A. 1933. Sacristy and sanctuary. New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
  30. O’Neill, H. 1944. Botanical observations on the Voynich MS. Speculum 19: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ortega, M., J.A. Ascencio, C.M. San-Germán, M.E. Fernández, L. López, and M. José-Yacamán. 2001. Analysis of prehispanic pigments from “Templo Mayor” of Mexico City. Journal of Journal of Materials Science 36:751–756.Google Scholar
  32. Palatino Press. 2015. The Voynich manuscript: A facsimile of the complete work. www.palatinopress.com Google Scholar
  33. Pelling, N. 2006. The curse of the Voynich: The secret history of the World’s most mysterious manuscript. Surbiton, Surrey: Compelling Press.Google Scholar
  34. Powell, E.A. 2016. Recovering hidden texts. Archaeology 69 (2): 38–43.Google Scholar
  35. Richardin, P., V. Mazel, P. Walter, O. Laprévote, and A. Brunelle. 2011. Identification of different copper green pigments in renaissance paintings by cluster-TOF-SIMS imaging analysis. Journal of the American Society of Mass Spectrometry 22: 1729–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romero Ramirez, M.E. 2013. Limp, laced-case binding in parchment on sixteenth-century Mexican printed books. Ph.D. thesis, Camberwell College of Arts, University of the Arts London. Vols. 2.Google Scholar
  37. Sherwood, E. 2010. Analysis of radiocarbon dating statistics in reference to the Voynich manuscript. http://www.edithsherwood.com/radiocarbon_dating_statistics/radiocarbon_dating_statistics.pdf. 30 Dec 2012.
  38. Skinner, S., R.T. Prinke, and R. Zandbergen. 2017. The Voynich manuscript: The world’s most mysterious and esoteric codex. London: Watkins.Google Scholar
  39. Snijders, L., T. Zaman, and D. Howell. 2016. Using hyperspectral imaging to reveal a hidden precolonial Mesoamerican codex. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 9: 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Soskice, J. 2010. The sisters of Sinai: How two lady adventurers discovered the hidden gospels. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  41. Stolte, D. 2011. UA experts determine age of book ‘nobody can read.’ http://uanews.org/node/37825. 25 July 2012.
  42. Tucker, A.O., and R.H. Talbert. 2013. A preliminary analysis of the botany, zoology, and mineralogy of the Voynich manuscript. HerbalGram 100: 70–85.Google Scholar
  43. Wintle, S. 2017. Master of the Banderoles. http://www.wopc.co.uk/netherlands/master-of-the-banderoles. 2 Mar 2017.
  44. Zandbergen, R. 2016. The radio-carbon dating of the Voynich MS. www.voynich.nu/extra/carbon.html. 5 June 2017.
  45. Zetina, S., J.L. Ruvalcaba, T. Falcón, E. Hernández, C. González, E. Arroyo, and M. López Estéticas. 2008. Painting syncretism: A non-destructive analysis of the Badiano Codex. Pages 1–10 in 9th international conference on NDT of Art, Jerusalem, Israel, 25–30 May 2008.Google Scholar
  46. Zyats, P., E. Mysak, J. Stenger, M.-F. Lemay, A. Bezur, and D.D. Driscoll. 2016. Physical findings. In The Voynich manuscript, ed. R. Clemens, 23–37. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticulture & Landscape ArchitecturePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture & Natural ResourcesDelaware State UniversityDoverUSA

Personalised recommendations