Advertisement

Freedom and Schizophrenia

  • Matthew Whittingham
Chapter

Abstract

I end here with a brief argument to show the connection of the holistic conception of the individual with an account of mental crisis and schizophrenia. This chapter is included to show that our attempts at forming coherent self-descriptions, as part of an ongoing project of self-realisation, do not always proceed smoothly. On the contrary, these attempts often result not in autonomy but in alienation and mental crisis. It attempts to point out a line of continuity between healthy but struggling individuals and schizophrenics that might help us sympathise with and better understand their plight as a thoroughly human one. It is also included to show the potential of the ideas outlined here for further fruitful interdisciplinary applications.

Bibliography

  1. Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Two Concepts of Liberty. In Liberty, ed. Henry Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freud, Sigmund. 2004. Civilization and Its Discontents. Trans. David McLintock. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  3. Gillett, Grant. 2009. The Mind and Its Discontents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hegel, G.W.F., ed. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H.B. Nisbet, ed. Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Laing, R.D. 1965. The Divided Self. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1972. Knots. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Laing, R.D., and A. Esterson. 1990. Sanity, Madness and the Family. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. 2001. Damaged Identities, Narrative Repair. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pickard, Hannah, and Lisa Ward. 2013. Responsibility Without Blame: Philosophical Reflections on Clinical Practice. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Szasz, Thomas. 1974. The Myth of Mental Illness. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2008. Psychiatry: The Science of Lies. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Trilling, Lionel. 1995. The Opposing Self. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  14. Wilson, Peter J. 1992. Oscar: An Inquiry into the Nature of Sanity? Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  15. Winfield, Richard D. 1983. Freedom as Interaction: Hegel’s Resolution to the Dilemma of Liberal Theory. In Hegel’s Philosophy of Action, ed. Lawrence S. Stepelevich and David Lamb. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Whittingham
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations