Introduction: Philosophy and Literary Modernism—An Old Problem Finally Made New

  • Ana Falcato
  • Antonio Cardiello


In this introductory chapter, we discuss some recent theoretical approaches to the relations between Western Philosophy and Literary Modernism, and at the same time, we get back to some classic contrasts drawn between the two creative enterprises in the foundational texts of each tradition, which make them seem irreconcilable. Recent rapprochements made by commentators on twentieth-century philosophy and the cultural breakthrough of Modernism in the last decade of the nineteenth-century have insisted on a disenchanted rupture with all kinds of metaphysical worldviews (now seen as myths), which had theretofore played a stabilizing role in human beings’ lives and in Western societies at large. Usually this demystifying gesture is associated with a concentration of theoretical attention on the role played by language itself. In terms of the development of philosophical methods in the twentieth-century, this has been especially associated with the so-called ‘linguistic analysis’. You could conceive of the linguistic turn as a new metaphysical framework. This framework would equally encompass the whole of reality in a single, unifying principle. In this book we mean to avoid this essentialist worldview by drawing on highly differentiated resources from human language itself, be it poetry, the novel, the theatre or the plastic arts.


Recounting myths Demystification T.S. Eliot Hans-Georg Gadamer Stanley Cavell Modernism and language 


  1. Cavell, S. 2002. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Eliot, T.S. 1975. Selected Prosed of T.S. Eliot, ed. and with an Introduction by Frank Kermode. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  3. Everett, B. 1986. Golding’s Pity. In William Golding: The Man and His Books, ed. J. Carey. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  4. Fried, M. 1980. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gadamer, H.-G. 2000. The Beginning of Philosophy. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Gaita, R. 1998. A Common Humanity: Thinking About Love and Truth and Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Levenson, M. (ed.). 1999. The Cambridge Companion to Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Matar, A. 2006. Modernism and the Language of Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mulhall, S. 2009. The Wounded Animal. J.M. Coetzee and the Difficulty of Reality in Literature and Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Pataut, M. 2006. Review of ‘Anat Matar, Modernism and the Language of Philosophy, Routledge, 2006’. In Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Web. 31 July, 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Pessoa, F. 2015. The Book of Disquiet, trans. and ed. Richard Zenith. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  12. Pippin, R. 1999. Modernism as a Philosophical Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Falcato
    • 1
  • Antonio Cardiello
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy of Nova (IFILNOVA)New University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations