Advertisement

The Damascus Shari‘a Court: The Judge, Arbitration, and Lawyers in 2005

  • Jessica Carlisle
Chapter
Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)

Abstract

Codification of the Law of Personal Status was divisive during Syria’s establishment as a nation state. Subsequent ‘state feminist’ legal reforms were forced through by the authoritarian Ba’ath regime. In 2005, Damascus hectic Shari‘a (family) Court One was routinely and efficiently applying Law No. 59/1953, allowing three types of divorce: repudiation (talāq), divorce for compensation (mukhāla’a), and judicial divorce (shiqāq or tafrīq). Only judicial divorce can be initiated by a wife without her husband’s consent, although it is used almost equally by women and men. It requires considerable input from the court through the aegis of professional arbiters, is granted on a wide range of gender-based grounds, and is hardly documented. It invariably results in divorce and financial compensation to even ‘transgressive’ wives.

Keywords

Syrian Law of Personal Status Ba’athism Gender in Syria Islamic judicial divorce mukhāla’a shari‘a court 

References

  1. Anderson, J N D 1955 ‘The Syrian Law of Personal Status’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 17(1)34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atari, M (ed.) 2006 Qānūn Al-Aḥwāl Al-Shakhṣiyya (Law of Personal Status) Damascus: Mu’assasat Al-Nūrī.Google Scholar
  3. Cardinal, M 2010 ‘Why Aren’t Women Sharī‘a Court Judges? The Case of Syria’, Islamic Law and Society, 17(2): 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. El-Alami, D S & Hinchcliffe, D 1996 ‘Islamic Marriage and Divorce Laws of the Arab World’ The Hague: Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  5. Haddad, B 2013 Business Associations and the New Nexus of Power in Syria in Paul Aarts & Fancesco Cavatorta (eds) Civil Society in Syria and Iran: Activism in Authoritarian Contexts Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers: 69–91.Google Scholar
  6. Hinnebush, R 2001 Syria: Revolution from Above London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Jennings, R C 1993 ‘Divorce in the Ottoman Sharia Court of Cyprus, 1580–1640’, Studia Islamica, 78: 155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kawakibi, S 2013 The Paradox of Government-Organized Civil Activism in Syria in Paul Aarts & Fancesco Cavatorta (eds) Civil Society in Syria and Iran: Activism in Authoritarian ContextsBoulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers: 169–186Google Scholar
  9. Khatib, L 2013 Syria’s Civil Society as a Tool for Regime Legitimacy in Paul Aarts & Fancesco Cavatorta (eds) Civil Society in Syria and Iran: Activism in Authoritarian Contexts Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers: 19–37Google Scholar
  10. Lawson, F H 2000 ‘Westphalian Sovereignty and the Emergence of the Arab States System: The Case of Syria’, The International History Review, 22(3): 529–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meshal, R A 2014 ‘Sharia and the Making of the Modern Egyptian: Islamic Law and Custom in the Courts of Ottoman Cairo’ Cairo: AUC PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neep, D 2012 Occupying Syria Under the French Mandate: Insurgency, Space and State Formation Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rabo, A 2011 ‘Legal Pluralism and Family Law in Syria’ in (eds.) Werner Zips and Markus Weilenmann The Governance of Legal Pluralism: Empirical Studies from Africa and Beyond Munster: Lit-Verlag: 213–234.Google Scholar
  14. Robson, L 2017 States of Separation: Transfer, Partition, and the Making of the Modern Middle East Oakland: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Seale, P 1965 The Struggle for Syria: A Study of Post-War Politics, 1945–58 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Tucker, J 1997 In the House of the Law: Gender and Islamic Law in Syria and Palestine 17th–18th Centuries Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Eijk, E 2014 Family Law in Syria: Patriarchy, Pluralism and Personal Status Codes, London: I B TaurisGoogle Scholar
  18. White, B T 2010 ‘Addressing the State: The Syrian ‘Ulama’ Protest Personal Status Law Reform, 1939’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(1): 10-12.Google Scholar
  19. White, B T 2011 The Emergence of Minorities in the Middle East: The Politics of Community in French Mandate Syria Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yazbak, M 2002 Minor Marriages and Khiyār al-Bulūgh in Ottoman Palestine: A Note on Women’s Strategies in a Patriarchal Society Islamic Law and Society, 9(3): 386–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica Carlisle
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Science, Knowledge and Belief in SocietyNewman UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations