Advertisement

Implementing Plant Health Regulations with Focus on Invasive Forest Pests and Pathogens: Examples from Swedish Forest Nurseries

  • E. Carina H. Keskitalo
  • Caroline Strömberg
  • Maria Pettersson
  • Johanna Boberg
  • Maartje Klapwijk
  • Jonàs Oliva Palau
  • Jan Stenlid
Chapter

Abstract

International trade and climate change have increased the movement potential for invasive alien species (IAS), including invasive pests and pathogens (IPPs), to the point where biological invasions are considered one of the major threats to biodiversity. However, practical implementation of plant health with regard to IAS and IPPs is difficult: regulative responsibilities are commonly spread across different authorities, and resources on the ground are often limited. Based on a legislative and literature review and semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 7), the present study examines the possibilities and potential risks of monitoring and detection of forest invasive species in Sweden, with a particular focus on forest plant nurseries. The study thus adds practical implementation aspects concerning possibilities to limit the spread of invasive species in the plant trade.

References

  1. Bergey, E. A., Figueroa, L. L., Mather, C. M., Martin, R. J., Ray, E. J., Kurien, J. T., et al. (2014). Trading in snails: Plant nurseries as transport hubs for non-native species. Biological Invasions, 16(7), 1441–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunel, S., Fernández-Galiano, E., Genovesi, P., Heywood, V. H., Kueffer, C., & Richardson, D. M. (2013). Invasive alien species: A growing but neglected threat. In Late lessons from early warnings: Science, precaution, innovation (pp. 518–540). Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency. Google Scholar
  3. Caffrey, J. M., Baars, J.-E., Barbour, J. H., Boets, P., Boon, P., Davenport, K., et al. (2014). Tackling invasive alien species in Europe: The top 20 issues. Management of Biological Invasions, 5(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleary, M., Ghasemkhani, M., Blomquist, M., & Witzell, J. (2016). First report of Phytophthora gonapodyides causing stem canker on European beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Southern Sweden. Plant Disease, PDIS-04-16-0468-PDN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. COM (2011) 244 final. Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020.Google Scholar
  6. COM (2013) 267 final. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on protective measures against pests of plants.Google Scholar
  7. Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material.Google Scholar
  8. Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community.Google Scholar
  9. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Holdenrieder, O., Jeger, M. J., & Pautasso, M. (2010). Structural change in the international horticultural industry: Some implications for plant health. Scientia Horticulturae, 125, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2010). Evaluation of the community plant health regime. Final Report. https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/ph_biosec_rules_final_report_eval_en.pdf.
  11. Government Bill. Prop. 2012/13:174. Ändringar i växtskyddslagen.Google Scholar
  12. Grünwald, N. J., Garbelotto, M., Goss, E. M., Heungens, K., & Prospero, S. (2012). Emergence of the sudden oak death pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. Trends in Microbiology, 20, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haack, R. A., Hérard, F., Sun, J., & Turgeon, J. J. (2009). Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective. Annual Review of Entomology, 55(1), 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmes, T. P., Aukema, J. E., Von Holle, B., Liebhold, A., & Sills, E. (2009). Economic impacts of invasive species in forests: Past, present, and future. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1162, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jung, T., Orlikowski, L., Henricot, B., Abad-Campos, P., Aday, A. G., Aguín Casal, O., et al. (2016). Widespread Phytophthora infestations in European nurseries put forest, semi-natural and horticultural ecosystems at high risk of Phytophthora diseases. Forest Pathology, 46(2), 134–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klapwijk, M. J., Hopkins, A. J. M., Eriksson, L., Pettersson, M., Schroeder, M., Lindelöw, Å., et al. (2016). Reducing the risk of invasive forest pests and pathogens: Combining legislation, targeted management and public awareness. Ambio, 45, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liebhold, A. M., Brockerhoff, E. G., Garrett, L. J., Parke, J. L., & Britton, K. O. (2012). Live plant imports: The major pathway for forest insect and pathogen invasions of the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lilja, A., Rytkonen, A., Hantula, J., Muller, M., Parikka, P., & Kurkela, T. (2011). Introduced pathogens found on ornamentals, strawberry and trees in Finland over the past 20 years. Agricultural and Food Science, 20, 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacLeod, A., Pautasso, M., Jeger, M. J., & Haines-Young, R. (2010). Evolution of the international regulation of plant pest and challenges for future plant health. Food Security, 2, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manion, P. D., & Griffin, D. H. (2001). Large landscape scale analysis of tree death in the Adirondack Park, New York. Forest Science, 47, 542–549.Google Scholar
  21. O’Brien, K. L., & Leichenko, R. M. (2000). Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change, 10(3), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ordinance (2006:817) on plant protection.Google Scholar
  23. Perrings, C., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Touza, J., & Williamson, M. (2005). How to manage biological invasions under globalization. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(5), 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pettersson, M., Strömberg, C., & Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2016). Possibility to implement invasive species control in Swedish forests. Ambio, 45, 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Redondo M. A., Boberg J., Olsson C. H., & Oliva J. (2015a). Winter conditions correlate with Phytophthora alni subspecies distribution in southern Sweden. Phytopathol, 105(9), 1191–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Redondo, M. Á., Boberg, J., Stenlid, J., & Oliva, J. (2015b). First report of Phytophthora pseudosyringae causing basal cankers on horse chestnut in Sweden. Plant Disease, 100, 1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on protective measures against pests of plants, amending Regulations (EU) No. 228/2013, (EU) No. 652/2014 and (EU) No. 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 69/464/EEC, 74/647/EEC, 93/85/EEC, 98/57/EC, 2000/29/EC, 2006/91/EC and 2007/33/EC.Google Scholar
  28. Ricciardi, A. (2006). Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change? Conservation Biology, 21(2), 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santini, A., Ghelardini, L., De Pace, C., Desprez-Loustau, M. L., Capretti, P., Chandelier, A., et al. (2013). Biogeographical patterns and determinants of invasion by forest pathogens in Europe. New Phytologist, 197, 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shiffers, B. (2017). New European Union plant health regime: A more stringent regulation that could impact trade from developing countries in the near future (Guest editorial). Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection, 12(1), 1–3. Available at https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/212920/1/Schiffers.TunisianJPlantProtect.2017.pdf.
  31. Shine, C., Williams, N., & Gündling, L. (2000). A guide to designing legal and institutional frameworks on alien invasive species (No. 40). IUCN.Google Scholar
  32. SJVFS 2004:53. Regulations of the Swedish Board of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  33. Skogsindustrierna. (2000). Europe needs the forest industry. Stockholm: Skogsindustrierna/Swedish Forest Industries Federation.Google Scholar
  34. Skogsindustrierna. (2013). Facts and figures. Stockholm: Skogsindustrierna/Swedish Forest Industries Federation, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  35. SKSFS 1993:2. Regulations of the Swedish Forest Agency.Google Scholar
  36. SKSFS 2010:2. Regulations of the Swedish Forest Agency.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, A. L., Bazely, D. R., & Yan, N. (2014). Are legislative frameworks in Canada and Ontario up to the task of addressing invasive alien species? Biological Invasions, 16(7), 1325–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ST 8795 2016 REV 2 - 2013/0141 (OLP). Position of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on protective measures against pests of plants, amending Regulations (EU) No. 228/2013, (EU) No. 652/2014 and (EU) No. 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 69/464/EEC, 74/647/EEC, 93/85/EEC, 98/57/EC, 2000/29/EC, 2006/91/EC and 2007/33/EC—Adopted by the Council on 18 July 2016.Google Scholar
  39. Stenlid, J., & Oliva, J. (2016). Phenotypic interactions between tree hosts and invasive forest pathogens in the light of globalization and climate change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 371, 20150455.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stenlid, J., Oliva, J., Boberg, J. B., & Hopkins, A. J. M. (2011). Emerging diseases in European forest ecosystems and responses in society. Forests, 2, 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodward, S., & Boa, E. (2013). Ash dieback in the UK: A wake-up call. Molecular Plant Pathology, 14, 856–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Carina H. Keskitalo
    • 1
  • Caroline Strömberg
    • 2
  • Maria Pettersson
    • 2
  • Johanna Boberg
    • 3
  • Maartje Klapwijk
    • 4
  • Jonàs Oliva Palau
    • 3
  • Jan Stenlid
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Economic HistoryUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social SciencesLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden
  3. 3.Department of Forest Mycology and Plant PathologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.Department of EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations