Towards an Agenda for Social Science Contributions on the Human Dimensions of Forest Health

  • Mariella Marzano
  • Julie Urquhart


This chapter lays the foundations for future social science research in tree health. A broad range of pests, pathways and stakeholders are considered by the authors, who explore the significance of collaborative approaches to management to ensure inclusion of diverse values, experiences, impacts and agency. The chapter highlights the complexities involved when tree health at local scales is set within the global context of market pressures, harvesting practices, governance processes and ‘risky’ behaviours that can contribute to pest introduction, establishment and spread. As social science research in tree health develops, there is a need for closer interdisciplinary engagement between natural and social scientists and between social scientists and policy. The arts and humanities may also offer insights and new ways of understanding the human dimensions of tree health.


  1. Fuller, L., Marzano, M., Peace, A., Quine, C. P., & Dandy, N. (2016). Public acceptance of tree health management: Results of a national survey in the UK. Environmental Science & Policy, 59, 18–25.
  2. Holmes, T. P., Allen, W., Haight, R. G., Keskitalo, E. C. H., Marzano, M., Pettersson, M., et al. (2017). Fundamental economic irreversibilities influence policies for enhancing international forest phytosanitary security. Current Forestry Reports, 3(3), 244–254.
  3. Mackenzie, B. F., & Larson, B. M. H. (2010). Participation under time constraints: Landowner perceptions of rapid response to the Emerald ash borer. Society & Natural Resources, 23(1), 1013–1022.
  4. MacLeod, A., Pautasso, M., Jeger, M. J., & Haines-Young, R. (2010). Evolution of the international regulation of plant pests and the challenges for future plant health. Food Security, 2(1), 49–70.
  5. Marzano, M., Dandy, N., Bayliss, H. R., Porth, E., & Potter, C. (2015). Part of the solution? Stakeholder awareness, information and engagement in tree health issues. Biological Invasions, 17(7), 1961–1977.
  6. Marzano, M., Allen, W., Dandy, N., Haight, R., Holmes, T., Keskitalo, E. C. H., et al. (2017). The role of the social sciences in understanding and informing tree biosecurity policy and planning: A global synthesis. Biological Invasions, 19(11), 3317–3332.
  7. Porth, E. F., Dandy, N., & Marzano, M. (2015). “My garden is the one with no trees”: Residential lived experiences of the 2012 Asian Longhorn Beetle Eradication Programme in Kent, England. Human Ecology, 43(5), 669–679.
  8. Sutherland, A., da Silva Wells, C., Darteh, B., & Butterworth, J. (2012). Researchers as actors in urban water governance? Perspectives on learning alliances as an innovative mechanism for change. International Journal of Water, 6(3/4), 311–329.
  9. Urquhart, J., Potter, C., Barnett, J., Fellenor, J., Mumford, J., Quine, C. P., et al. (2017). Awareness, concern and willingness to adopt biosecure behaviours: Public perceptions of invasive tree pests and pathogens in the UK. Biological Invasions, 19(9), 2567–2582.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariella Marzano
    • 1
  • Julie Urquhart
    • 2
  1. 1.Forest ResearchEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Countryside & Community Research InstituteUniversity of Gloucestershire, Oxstalls CampusGloucesterUK

Personalised recommendations