Advertisement

Urban Resilience and Informality: Effects of Formalisation in Golestan, Iran

  • Solmaz Hosseinioon
Chapter
Part of the Resilient Cities book series (RCRUT)

Abstract

In times of rapid changes and transformations which new paradigms and challenges are arising fast, it is felt more than ever that we require more adaptive viewpoints in urban decision making and planning. The importance of resilience thinking framework is ever increasingly felt in various aspects of built environment and human settlements whether formal or informal.

Informal settlements are an important part of urbanity due to rapid urbanization, lack of access to affordable housing, disasters, civil wars and climate change. Socio-political events as well the modernization processes have increased the people’s tendency to live in these areas due to the need for affordable shelter and job opportunities for survival. These areas are very vulnerable to disasters due to their usually exposed situations. Informality as a way of life, is strongly present in informal settlements but it does not mean it is not present in all other aspects of urban areas. Informality is not a problem anymore rather a dominant type of urbanity which needs to be studied, analysed and learned from. It helps demonstrating features compatible with resilience attributes in some aspects.

This article is an inquiry into the effects of formalization of informal settlements within a resilience thinking framework. Formalization in this research includes the urban codes for regularization. Resilience is a solution for dealing with uncertainty and adaptation in complex developments. Practices such as urban planning and design codes transform the urban form. This research traces the transformations imposed by urban planning regulations for upgrading three neighbourhoods with different levels of formalization in Golestan, Tehran, Iran. It compares and studies the effects of urban upgrading processes on adaptation capacities through an urban design lens.

Keywords

Resilience Regulations Formalization Informality Adaptation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is extracted from a PhD dissertation for attaining the doctor of philosophy degree in the University of Melbourne supervised by professor Kim Dovey and supported by APA scholarship by the Australian government.

This paper was presented in RESURBE III Mexico international conference on Urban & Regional resilience conference and has won the RESURBE prize as Best Practice award in year 2016.

I want to express my deep gratitude to the honorable reviewers in the different stages of this article’s acceptance from RESURBE conference, to UNESCO chair for sustainability and the award for resilience 2016 and springer publications for their valuable comments and insights.

References

  1. Adger, W. N. (2003). Building resilience to promote sustainability. IHDP Update 2: 1–3.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., et al. (2013). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alliance, R. (2007). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems. A workbook for scientists. Version 1.1. Draft for testing and evaluation, Resilience Alliance.Google Scholar
  4. AlSayyad, N. (2004). Urban informality as a ‘New’ way of life transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. In A. Roy & N. AlSayyad (Eds.), Urban informality (pp. 7–30). New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
  5. Bayat, A. (1997). Street politics: Poor people’s movements in Iran. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., et al. (2011). Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City, 15(2), 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmin, J., Dodman, D., et al. (2011). Urban adaptation planning and governance: Challenges to emerging wisdom. In Resilient bities (pp. 123–129). Bonn: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, S., Walker, B., et al. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4(8), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, P. F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dovey, K. (2012). Informal urbanism and complex adaptive assemblage. International Development Planning Review, 34(4), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fainstein, S. (2013). Resilience and justice. MSSI Research Paper Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute. No. 2.Google Scholar
  12. Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (2002). In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hartzog, P. B. (2005). Panarchy: Governance in the network age. Internet paper found at http://www.panarchy.com/Members/PaulbHartzog/Papers:2.
  15. Hillier, J. (2007). Stretching beyond the horizon: A multiplanar theory of spatial planning and governance. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Hillier, J. (2011). Strategic navigation across multiple planes: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 82(5), 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lefebvre, H. (1992). The production of space. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Longstaff, P. H., et al. (2010). Building resilient communities a preliminary framework for assessment. Homeland Security Affairs, 6(3).Google Scholar
  20. McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mehaffy, M. W. (2011). A city is not a rhinoceros: On the aims and opportunities of morphogenetic urban design. Built Environment, 37(4), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mehta, B., Janus, S., et al. (2008). Approaches to urban slums: A multimedia sourcebook on adaptive and proactive strategies. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moroni, S., & Chiodelli, F. (2014). The complex Nexus between informality and the law: Reconsidering unauthorised settlements in light of the concept of Nomotropism. Geoforum, 51, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neuwirth, R. (2006). Shadow cities: A billion squatters, an urban new world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(4), 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2006). Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Springfield: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  27. Pfefferbaum, B. J., Reissman, D. B., et al. (2007). Building resilience to mass trauma events. In Handbook of injury and violence prevention (pp. 347–358). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Porter, L., & Davoudi, S. (2012). The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Revell, K. (2010). Working with informality: Increasing resilience in cities of the Global South. 46th ISOCARP Congress.Google Scholar
  30. Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roy, A., & AlSayyad, N. (2004). Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. In A. Roy & N. Nezar AlSayyad (Eds.), Center for Middle Eastern Studies, University of California. Berkeley: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  32. Sennett, R. (2006). The open city (pp. 1–5). Berlin: Urban Age.Google Scholar
  33. UN-Habitat. (2003). The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements, 2003. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(3), 337–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. UN-Habitat. (2009). Planning sustainable cities—Global report on human settlements 2009. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  35. Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J. (2005). The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disasters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Walker, B. H., & Salt, D. (2006). In B. Walker, D. Salt, & W. V. Reid (Eds.), Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wilkinson, C. (2011). Strategic navigation: In search of an adaptable mode of strategic spatial planning practice. Town Planning Review, 82(5), 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilkinson, C. (2012). Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory, 11(2), 148–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yiftachel, O. (2009). Critical theory and ‘grey space’: Mobilization of the colonized. City, 13(2–3), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Solmaz Hosseinioon
    • 1
  1. 1.Urban Designer, Independent Urban Scholar, ResearcherMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations