Living with a Generation—Qilinghou, Balinghou, Jiulinghou

  • Chow Yiu Fai
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society book series (PSGCS)


This chapter investigates the experiences of single women in creative work along the generational paradigm, not only as a matter of age in the personal, individual sense, but also as connected to the historical features specific to China—for instance, the post-1990s (jiulinghou) with their confident earnestness to engage in start-up projects, the post-1980s (balinghou) with the introduction of the one-child policy, and the post-1970s (qilinghou) with the intertwining of the lives of their contemporaries with the end of the Cultural Revolution. The chapter engages critically with theories that seek to employ social generations as an important way to analyse people’s relationships with their life courses, examining their usefulness and limitations. This chapter outlines the genealogies of Chinese generational terms and reviews a collection of popular generational publications. Meanwhile, as cued by the subjects, historical features will be documented to configure a wider context to understand their subjective accounts as single women doing creative work.


  1. “Breaking Out: China’s Youth Finally Dare to Be Different.” Time, February 2, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. Bristow, Jennie. The Sociology of Generations: New Directions and Challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr, D. Jasun, Melissa R. Gotlieb, Nam-Jin Lee, and Dhavan V. Shah. “Examining Overconsumption, Competitive Consumption, and Conscious Consumption from 1994 to 2004: Disentangling Cohort and Period Effects.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644, no. 1 (2012): 220–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Jian, and Rong Lian. “Generational Differences in Work Values in China.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 43, no. 4 (2015): 567–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corré, Anne. “Ik Wil Er ‘t Allerbeste van Maken.” NRC Handelsblad, April 8, 2017, sec. E14-E15.Google Scholar
  6. Dou, Wenyu, Guangping Wang, and Nan Zhou. “Generational and Regional Differences in Media Consumption Patterns of Chinese Generation X Consumers.” Journal of Advertising 35, no. 2 (2006): 101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. France, Alan, and Steven Roberts. “The Problem of Social Generations: A Critique of the New Emerging Orthodoxy in Youth Studies.” Journal of Youth Studies 18, no. 2 (2015): 215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gong, Xiaobing (恭小兵). “总结:关于80后 [Summarizing: About the Post-80s].” 天涯论坛 [Tianya Luntan], July 11, 2003.
  9. He, Wei, and Hui Zheng. “Under the One Child Policy Regime in China: Did Having Younger Sibling(s) Increase the Risk of Overweight and Underweight Status?” Asian Population Studies 13, no. 3 (2017): 267–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang, Bing (江冰). “论‘80后’文字文学 [On ‘Post-80s’ Writing Literature].” 中国作家网 [Zhongguo Zuojiawang], April 23, 2008.
  11. Kertzer, D. I. “Generation as a Sociological Problem.” Annual Review of Sociology 9, no. 1 (1983): 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Kloet, Jeroen, and Anthony Y. H. Fung. Youth Cultures in China. Cambridge: Polity, 2017.Google Scholar
  13. Lao, Bei (老北). “70后、80后与90后 [The Post-70s, the Post-80s and the Post-90s].” 文化中国 [Wenhua Zhongguo] (blog), September 19, 2010.
  14. Li, Chunling (李春玲). “静悄悄的革命是否临近?—从80后和90后的价值观转变看年轻一代的先行性 [Is the Quiet Revolution Imminent?—The Advances of the Younger Generation from the Transformative Values of the Post-80s and Post-90s].” 河北学刊 [Hebei Xue Kan], no. 3 (2015): 100–104.Google Scholar
  15. Li, Hui (李慧). “对‘70后’命名的思考 [Reflection on the Term of ’Post-70s’].” 安徽文学:下半月 [Anhui Wenxue: Xia Banyue], no. 8 (2009): 319–20.Google Scholar
  16. Li, Li. “The ‘Me Generation.’” Beijing Review, February 3, 2008.
  17. Lian, Hongping. “The Post-1980s Generation in China: Exploring Its Theoretical Underpinning.” Journal of Youth Studies 17, no. 7 (2014): 965–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ma, Er (马耳). “陈卫与‘70后’ [Chen Wei and the ‘Post-70s’].” 豆瓣小组 [Douban Xiaozu] (blog), September 21, 2011.
  19. Mannheim, Karl. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, 276–322. London: Routledge, 1928.Google Scholar
  20. Mat, Joke. “Jong, Slim En Boordevol Twijfel.” NRC Handelsblad, April 8, 2017.Google Scholar
  21. Mead, Margaret. Culture and Commitment: A Study of the Generation Gap. New York: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. Ng, Jhony Choon Yeong, Christina Maria Helminger, and Qianyun Wu. “A Generational Cohort Model for Consumers in China: The Rise and Fall of the Great Gatsby?” A Generational Cohort Model for Consumers in China: The Rise and Fall of the Great Gatsby? 7, no. 1 (2016): 53–66.Google Scholar
  23. Ortega Y. Gasset, José. The Modern Theme. New York: W. W. Norton Company, 1933.Google Scholar
  24. Peugny, Camille, and Cécile Van de Velde. “Rethinking Inter-Generational Inequality.” Translated by Peter Hamilton. Revue Française de Sociologie 54, no. 4 (2013): 641–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pyšňáková, Michaela, and Steven Miles. “The Post-Revolutionary Consumer Generation: ‘Mainstream’ Youth and the Paradox of Choice in the Czech Republic.” Journal of Youth Studies 13, no. 5 (2010): 533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rene, Helena K. China’s Sent-Down Generation: Public Administration and the Legacies of Mao’s Rustication Program. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  27. Rosen, Stanley. “Contemporary Chinese Youth and the State.” The Journal of Asian Studies 68, no. 2 (2009): 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vlase, Ionela, and Rebekka Sieber. “Narrating Well-Being in the Context of Precarious Prosperity: An Account of Agency Framed by Culturally Embedded Happiness and Gender Beliefs.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 23, no. 2 (2016): 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilson, Julie Ann, and Emily Chivers Yochim. “Mothering Through Precarity.” Cultural Studies 29, no. 5–6 (2015): 669–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Woodman, Dan. “Researching ‘Ordinary’ Young People in a Changing World: The Sociology of Generations and the ‘Missing Middle’ in Youth Research.” Sociological Research Online 18, no. 1 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wyn, Johanna, and Dan Woodman. “Generation, Youth and Social Change in Australia.” Journal of Youth Studies 9, no. 5 (2006): 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xin, Hua (新华). “‘70后、80后、90后’,时代催生的‘话题三重门’ [‘The Post-70s, Post-80s, Post-90s’, the ‘Topic Triple Door’ Spawned by Eras].” Edited by Li Yanmin (李彦敏). 乡音 [Xiangyin], no. 8 (2008): 42.Google Scholar
  33. Yi, Xiang, Barbara Ribbens, Linna Fu, and Weibo Cheng. “Variation in Career and Workplace Attitudes by Generation, Gender, and Culture Differences in Career Perceptions in the United States and China.” Employee Relations 37, no. 1 (2015): 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yi, Xiang, Barbara Ribbens, and Caryn N. Morgan. “Generational Differences in China: Career Implications.” Career Development International 15, no. 6 (2010): 601–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yin, Ming (尹铭). “‘60后’眼中的‘70后、80后、90后’ [‘The Post-70s, Post-80s, Post-90s’ in the Eyes of ‘the Post-60s’].” Edited by Li Yanmin (李彦敏). 乡音 [Xiangyin], no. 8 (2008): 42–43.Google Scholar
  36. Yoo, Jin-Seok. “Young Consumers Drive China’s New Economic Model.” SERI Quarterly 6, no. 4 (2013): 113–18.Google Scholar
  37. Yuan, Yue (袁岳), and Zhang Jun (张军). 我们90后 [We the Post-90s]. Hangzhou: 浙江大学出版社 [Zhejiang daxue chubanshe], 2011.Google Scholar
  38. Zhao, Feng. “The Evolution from Generation to Post-XX.” Translated by Ted Wang. Chinese Education & Society 44, no. 2–3 (2011): 76–79.Google Scholar
  39. Zhu, Qi (朱其). “‘70后’:这个名称意味着什么? [The Post-70s: What Does This Name Mean?].” 美苑 [Meiyuan], no. 5 (2005): 5–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chow Yiu Fai
    • 1
  1. 1.Hong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations