Advertisement

Geostrategy of the European Union in Energy

  • André B. DorsmanEmail author
  • Andries Nentjes
  • Petr Polak
Chapter

Abstract

Among the many problems the European Union (EU) is facing, the energy question is an important one. Climate change forces the EU to reduce the use of fossil fuel. However, security of supply of energy relies heavily on the use of fossil fuel. This creates a dilemma for EU policy. The pollution caused by gas is less than the pollution of the other fossil fuels such as coal and oil. Therefore it seems reasonable that the first reduction will take place in the use of coal and oil and later on gas. This brings us to the next problem, namely that the EU is dependent on the gas import from politically instable countries. In this chapter, we will pay attention to the reduction of the use of fossil fuel as well as to the EU policy on gas import. We give an overview of the steps that the EU has taken and shall take to realize her goals for the coming years. To secure the availability of energy the EU will face a high gas dependency for quite some time. The gas market knows a number of instable countries, which makes energy a difficult political issue. The EU has to speak with one voice. In the EU every member country has a blocking vote, which weakens the position of the EU in the negotiations with non-EU gas suppliers. An alternative is the Energy Union, where the member countries have no blocking vote but takes their decisions based on the majority of the voting countries. To operate as one block is a better position than when EU-members negotiate bilaterally.

Keywords

EU climate policy EU-ETS system 

References

  1. Alstone P, Gershenson D, Kammen DM (2015) Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access. Nat Clim Chang 5:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austvik OG (2016) The energy union and the security-gas supply. Energy Policy 96:372–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brundtland Report (1987) Our common future: report of the world commission on environment and development, United NationsGoogle Scholar
  4. Cengis MS, Mamis MS (2015) Price-efficiency relationship for photovoltaic cells on a global basis. Int J Photoenergy 2015:256101Google Scholar
  5. European Commission (2014) Commission communication on a policy framework for climate and energy from 2020 to 2030—COM(2014)0015Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (2016) EU energy in figures. Statistical Pocketbook 2016Google Scholar
  7. Fraunhofer ISE (2015) Current and future cost of photovoltaics. Study in behalf of Agora EnergiewendeGoogle Scholar
  8. International Energy Agency (2016) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion—highlights 2016. OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar
  9. Karbuz S (2018) Geostrategic importance of East Mediterranean gas sources. In: Dorsman AB, Ediger VAZ, Karan MB (eds) Energy economics, finance and geostrategy. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. Krozer Y, Nentjes A (2007) Milieu-innovatie en kosten van emissiereductie (environment innovation and costs of emission reduction). ESB 92(4515):452–455Google Scholar
  11. Misik M (2015) The influence of perception on the preferences of the new member states of the European Union: the case of energy policy. Int Issues Slovak Foreign Policy Aff 21:56–72Google Scholar
  12. Misik M (2017) Comments on “the energy union and security-of-gas supply”. Energy Policy 102:27–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Patel N, Seitz T, Yanosek K (2017) Three game changers for energy. McKinsey Quarterly, Apr 2017Google Scholar
  14. Polak, P. (2014), How to beat goliath: an EU energy union to fight Russia’s gas monopoly. Foreign Affairs, 10 Dec 2014Google Scholar
  15. Polak P (2015) Europe’s low energy: the promise and perils of the energy union. Foreign Affairs, 9 Sept 2015Google Scholar
  16. Polak P (2017) The trouble with Nord stream 2: how the pipeline would benefit Russia at the EU’s expense. Foreign Affairs, 23 Aug 2017Google Scholar
  17. Schipperus OT, Mulder M (2015) The effectiveness of policies to transform a gas-exporting country into a gas-transit country: the case of the Netherlands. Energy Policy 84:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simpson JL (2014) The influence of economic, financial and political indicators in south east Asian electricity markets. In: Dorsman A, Gök T, Karan MB (eds) Perspectives on energy risk. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simpson JL (2015) Deregulation in electricity markets: the interplay of stability and fossil fuel prices. In: Dorsman A, Westerman W, Simpson JL (eds) Energy, technology and valuation issues. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 199–213Google Scholar
  20. Skea J, Chaundry M, Wang X (2012) The role of gas infrastructure in promoting UK energy security. Energy Policy 43:202–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. The Economist (2013) ETS RIP?. The Economist, 20 Apr 2013Google Scholar
  22. The Economist (2017a) Power transmission; rise of the supergrid. The Economist, 14 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  23. The Economist (2017b) Roadkill. The Economist, 12 Aug 2017Google Scholar
  24. The Economist (2017c) Electrifying everything. The Economist, 12 Aug 2017Google Scholar
  25. The Economist (2017d) Infrastructure for electric cars; charge of the battery brigade. The Economist, 9 Sept 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • André B. Dorsman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andries Nentjes
    • 2
  • Petr Polak
    • 3
  1. 1.VU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.University of Brunei DarussalamGadongBrunei

Personalised recommendations