Engineering of Ground for Liquefaction Mitigation

  • A. Murali KrishnaEmail author
  • M. R. Madhav


Liquefaction is considered as a major crucial hazard among different seismic risks. Ground improvement methods commonly employed, to improve the natural site conditions under such situations, lead to better performance of various engineering structures built up on. The paper presents various aspects of liquefaction hazard mitigation of loose saturated sands with a spectrum of ground engineering methods. A short discussion on liquefaction hazard associated with loose sand deposits and its evaluation followed by outlines of the ground engineering applications with the main focus on stone columns/granular piles, sand compaction piles, deep soil mixing, and dynamic compaction as liquefaction hazard mitigation measures are presented.


Geotechnical earthquake engineering Liquefaction Ground improvement 


  1. Adalier, K., & Elgamal, A. (2004). Mitigation of liquefaction and associated ground deformations by stone columns. Engineering Geology, 72(3–4), 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, D.C.A. and Martin, G.R. (2000). Criteria for liquefaction of silty soils, Proc. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Auckland, New Zealand, Paper 0312.Google Scholar
  3. Andrus, R. D. (1994). In situ characterization of gravelly soils that liquefied in the 1983 Borah Peak Earthquake. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  4. Andrus, R. D., & Stokoe, K. H. (1997). Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity (Tech. Rep. NCEER-97-0022). National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 89–128.Google Scholar
  5. Baez, J. I. (1995). A design model for the reduction of soil liquefaction by vibro-stone columns. Ph.D thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Baez, J. I., & Martin, G. R. (1992). Quantitative evaluation of stone column technique for earthquake liquefaction mitigation 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 1477–1483.Google Scholar
  7. Balaam, N. P., & Booker, J. R. (1981). Analysis of rigid raft supported by granular piles. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 5(4), 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barksdale, R. D., & Bachus, R. C. (1983). Design and construction of stone columns (Rep. No. FHWA/RD-83/026), U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 194.Google Scholar
  9. Bhattacharya, S. (2006). Safety assessment of existing piled foundations in liquefiable soils against buckling instability. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 43(4), 133–147.Google Scholar
  10. Bouckovalas, G. D, Papadimitriou, A. G, Niarchos, D. (2009). Gravel drains for the remediation of liquefiable sites: The Seed & Booker (1977) approach revisited. Proceedings of International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering—From Case History to Practice, IS-Tokyo 2009.Google Scholar
  11. Bouckovalas, G. D., Papadimitriou, A. G., Niarchos, D., & Tsiapas, Y. Z. (2011). Sand fabric evolution effects on drain design for liquefaction mitigation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 1426–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boulanger, R., Idriss, I., Stewart, D., Hashash, Y., & Schmidt, B. (1998). Drainage capacity of stone columns or gravel drains for mitigating liquefaction, Proceedings of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 75(1), 678–690.Google Scholar
  13. BS EN 14679 (2005). Execution of special geotechnical works—deep mixing. British Standards (English version).Google Scholar
  14. Castro, G. (1975). Liquefaction and cyclic mobility of saturated sands. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 101(GT6), 551–569.Google Scholar
  15. Cetin, K. O., Seed, R. B., Der Kiureghian, A., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F., Jr., Kayen, R. E., & Moss, R. E. S. (2004). Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, 130(12), 1314–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Datye, K. R., & Nagaraju, S. S. (1975). Installation and testing of rammed stone columns. Proceeding of the IGS Specialty Session, 5th Asian Regional Conference on SMFE, Bangalore, India, 101–104.Google Scholar
  17. Datye, K. R., & Nagaraju, S. S. (1981). Design approach and field control for stone columns. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden. 3, 637–640.Google Scholar
  18. Dise, K., Stevens, M. G., & Von Thun, J. L. (1994). Dynamic compaction to remediate liquefiable embankment foundation soils. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 45, In-Situ Deep Soil Improvement l–25.Google Scholar
  19. FHWA. (1995). Dynamic compaction (FHWA Rep. No. FHWA-SA-95-037). U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. FHWA. (2000). An introduction to the deep soil mixing methods as used in geotechnical applications (FHWA Rep. No. FHWA-RD-99-138). Prepared by Geosystems (D.A. Bruce) for US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 143.Google Scholar
  21. Iai, S., & Koizumi, K. (1986). Estimation of earthquake induced excess pore water pressure for gravel drains. Proceedings of 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, 679–684.Google Scholar
  22. Idriss, I. M, & Boulanger, R. W. (2008). Soil liquefaction during earthquake. Monograph-12. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.Google Scholar
  23. IS 15284 (Part 1). (2003). Design and construction for ground improvement — Guidelines, Part 1 Stone Columns, analysis. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.Google Scholar
  24. Ishihara, K. (1993). Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique, 42(3), 351–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jafecusa. (2012). Retrieved April 1, 2012 from
  26. JGS. (1998). Remedial measures against soil liquefaction. In A. A. Balkema (Ed.). Rotterdam: The Japanese Geotechnical Society.Google Scholar
  27. Kitazume, M. (2005). The sand compaction pile method. Taylor & Francis Group Publisher, London: Balkeme Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar, S. (2001). Reducing liquefaction potential using dynamic compaction and construction of stone columns. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 19, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madabhushi, S. P. G. (2007). Ground improvement methods for liquefaction remediation. Ground Improvement, 11(4), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madhav M. R., Arlekar, J. N. (2000). Dilation of granular piles in mitigating liquefaction of sand deposits (No: 1035, CD-ROM). 12th World Conference Earthquake Engineering, Auckland.Google Scholar
  31. Madhav, M. R., & Murali Krishna, A. (2008). Liquefaction mitigation of sand deposits by granular piles-an overview. In H. L. Liu, A. Deng, & J. Chu (Eds.), Geotechnical engineering for disaster mitigation & rehabilitation, Nanjing, China. 66–79.Google Scholar
  32. Maheshwari, B. K., Nath, U. K., & Ramasamy, G. (2008). Influence of liquefaction on pile-soil interaction in vertical vibration. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 45, 1–12.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, G. R., Finn, W. D. L., & Seed, H. B. (1975). Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 101(GT5), 425–438.Google Scholar
  34. Massarsch, K. R., & Fellenius, B. H. (2002). Vibratory compaction of coarse-grained soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(3), 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matsuo, O., Shimazu, T., Goto, Y., Suzuki, Y., Okumura, R., & Kuwabara, M. (1996). Deep mixing method as a liquefaction prevention measure. Grouting and deep mixing. Proceedings of IS-Tokyo ’96. The Second International Conference on Ground Improvement Geosystems, Tokyo, May 14–17, 521–526.Google Scholar
  36. Mitchell, J. K. (2008). Mitigation of liquefaction potential of silty sands. In J. E. Laier, D. K. Crapps, M. H. Hussein (Eds.), From research to practice in geotechnical engineering. Geotechnical Special Publication 180, ASCE, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell, J. K., & Wentz, F. J. (1991). Performance of improved ground during the Loma Prieta earthquake (Report. No. UCB/EERC-91/12). Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
  38. Moss, R. E. S., Seed, R. B., Kayen, R. E., Stewart, J. P., Der Kiureghian, A., & Cetin, K. O. (2006). CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(8), 1032–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murali Krishna, A. (2011). Mitigation of liquefaction hazard using granular piles. International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 2(1), 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murali Krishna, A., & Madhav, M. R. (2007). Equivalent deformation properties of ground treated with rammed granular piles. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murali Krishna, A., & Madhav, M. R. (2008). Densification and dilation effects of granular piles in liquefaction mitigation. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 38(3), 295–316.Google Scholar
  42. Murali Krishna, A., & Madhav, M. R. (2009). Treatment of loose to medium dense sands by granular piles: Improved SPT N1 values. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27, 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murali Krishna, A., Madhav, M. R., & Madhavi Latha, G. (2006). Liquefaction mitigation of ground treated with granular piles: Densification effect. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 43(4), 105–120.Google Scholar
  44. Murali Krishna, A., Madhav, M. R., & Madhavi Latha, G. (2007). Densification effect of granular piles on settlement response of treated ground. Ground Improvement, 11(3), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. NCEER. (1997). National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER) (1997). In T. L. Youd, & I. M. Idriss (Eds.), Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils (Tech. Rep. NCEER-97-022).Google Scholar
  46. Noorzad, A, Poorooshasb, H. B., & Madhav, M. R. (2007). Performance of partially penetrating stone columns during an earthquake. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium on Numerical models in Geomechanics (NUMOG X), Rhodes, Greece, 503–508.Google Scholar
  47. Ohbayashi, J., Harda, K., & Yamamoto, M. (1999). Resistance against liquefaction of ground improved by sand compaction pile method. In Seco a Pinto (Ed.), Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Balkama, Rotterdam (312p).Google Scholar
  48. Okamura, M., Ishihara, M., & Oshita, T. (2003). Liquefaction resistance of sand improved with sand compaction piles. Soils Foundations, 43(5), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Okamura, M., Ishihara, M., & Tamura, K. (2006). Degree of saturation and liquefaction resistances of sand improved with sand compaction pile. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(2), 258–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Onoue, A. (1988). Diagrams considering well resistance for designing spacing ratio of gravel drains. Soils and Foundations, 28(3), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pestana, J. M., Hunt, C. E., Goughnour, R. R., & Kammerer, A. M. (1998). Effect of storage capacity on vertical drain performance in liquefiable sand deposits, Proceedings: Second International Conference on Ground Improvement Techniques, Singapore, 373–380.Google Scholar
  52. PIANC. (2001). Seismic design guidelines for port structures. Working Group No. 34 of the Maritime Navigation Commission International Navigation Association, Tokyo: A.A. Balkema Publishers.Google Scholar
  53. Poorooshasb, H. B., Noorzad, A., Miura, N., & Madhav, M. R. (2000). Prevention of earthquake induced liquefaction of sandy deposits using stone columns. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lowland Technology 2000, Saga. 213–220.Google Scholar
  54. Poorooshasb H. B., Madhav M. R., & Noorzad, A. (2006). Performance of stone columns subjected to a seismic base excitation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lowland Technology 2006, Saga, 1189–1194.Google Scholar
  55. Porbaha, A., Zen, K., & Kobayashi, M. (1999). Deep mixing technology for liquefaction mitigation. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 5(1), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Priebe, H. J., & Keller, G. (1995). Design of vibro replacement. Ground Engineering, 28(10), 31–37.Google Scholar
  57. Reyna, F., and Chameau, J.L. (1991), Dilatometer based liquefaction potential of sites in the Imperial Valley. Proceedings: Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis.1, 385–392.Google Scholar
  58. Sanjay, G., Shankar, R., & Sorabh, G. (2010). Dynamic compaction to mitigate liquefaction potential. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2010, December 16–18, 2010, 783–786.Google Scholar
  59. Sawicki, A., & Mierczynski, J. (2006). Developments in modeling liquefaction of granular soils, caused by cyclic loads. Applied Mechanics Reviews, Transactions of the ASME, 59(3), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seed, H. B. (1979). Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 105(2), 201–255.Google Scholar
  61. Seed, H. B., & Booker, J. R. (1977). Stabilization of potentially liquefiable sand deposits using gravel drains. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 103(7), 757–768.Google Scholar
  62. Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1982). Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.Google Scholar
  63. Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., Makdisi, F., & Bannerjee, N. (1975). Representation of irregular stress time histories by equivalent uniform stress series in liquefaction analyses (Rep. No. UCB/EERC/75-29). Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
  64. Seed, H. B., Martin, P. P., & Lysmer, M. J. (1976). Pore-water pressure changes during soil liquefaction. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 102(GT4), 323–346.Google Scholar
  65. Seed, R. B., Cetin, K. O., Moss, R. E. S., Kammerer, A. M., Wu, J., Pestana, J. M., Riemer, M. F., Sancio, R. B., Bray, J. D., Kayen, R. E., & Faris, A. (2003). Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: A unified and consistent framework. 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar, Long Beach, CA, April 30, 2003, 1–71.Google Scholar
  66. Shankar, R. (2001). Seismotectonics of Kutch rift basin and its bearing on the Himalayan seismicity. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 38(2–4), 59–65.Google Scholar
  67. Shenthan, T., Nashed, R., Thevanayagam, S., & Martin, G. R. (2004). Liquefaction mitigation in silty soils using composite stone columns and dynamic compaction. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 3(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Siddharthan, R. V., & Porbaha, A. (2008a). Seismic response evaluation of deep mixed improved ground part I: Proposed approach. Ground Improvement, 131(G13), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Siddharthan, R. V., & Porbaha, A. (2008b). Seismic response evaluation of deep mixed improved ground part II: Verification. Ground Improvement, 131(G13), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sitharam, T. G., Raju, L. G., & Murthy, B. R. S. (2004). Cyclic and monotonic undrained shear response of silty sand from Bhuj region in India. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 41(2–4), 249–260.Google Scholar
  71. Stark, T. D., & Olson, S. M. (1995). Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 121(GT12), 856–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Topolnicki, M. (2004). In situ soil mixing. In M. P. Moseley & K. Kirsch (Eds.), Ground improvement (2nd ed.). New York: Spon Press, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  73. Tsukamoto, Y., Ishihara, K., Yamamoto, M., Harada, K., & Yabe, H. (2000). Soil densification due to static sand pile installation for liquefaction remediation. Soils and Foundations, 40(2), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yasuda, S., Ishihara, K., Harada, K., & Shinkawa, N. (1996). Effect of soil improvement on ground subsidence due to liquefaction. Soils and Foundations, Special Issue, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Youd, T. L., Idriss, I. M., Ronald, D. A., Arango, I., Castro, G., Christian, J. T., Dobry, R., Finn, W. D. L., Harder, L. F., Jr., Hynes, M. E., Ishihara, K., Koester, J. P., Liao, S. S. C., Marcuson, W. F., III, Martin, G. R., Mitchell, J. K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M. S., Robertson, P. K., Seed, R. B., Stokoe, I. I., & H, K. (2001). Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(10), 817–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringI.I.T. Hyderabad & JNTUHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations