Devising Mobile Apps: Participatory Design for Endemic Diseases Transmitted by the Mosquito Aedes (Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya)

  • Tiago Franklin Rodrigues Lucena
  • Ana Paula Machado Velho
  • Vinicius Durval Dorne
  • Diana Maria Gallicchio Domingues
Chapter

Abstract

Dengue, zika and chikungunya are endemic diseases transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes that are affecting different countries in the world. Current efforts to control the mosquito are more effective when combined with the collaboration of population. Efforts to limit the number of cases have not been sufficiently effective and community engagement is essential to control the number of mosquitoes in the environment. This chapter describes the process of development of mobile apps designed to promote health and combat Aedes. The strategy was to engage the community and students from different levels in a city in of Brazil to devise, in a participatory design approach, apps to “fight” Aedes.

Keywords

Mobile apps Participatory design Community engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ana P.M. Velho was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development post-doctorate scholarship project under the supervision of Diana Domingues (CNPq-PQ-1A). In addition, to Ted Krueger for valuable guidance and some refreshing ideas.

Bibliography

  1. Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Carter, K., Graham, H., Hayward, P., Henry, A., et al. (2013). Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science, 8(3), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.769618.
  2. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Ferreira, A. C. R., Guilherme, Y., Velho, A. P. M., & Lucena, T. F. R. (2015). Aprimoramento do Conteúdo e Operacionalização do Aplicativo Radar Dengue: Uma experiência em Saúde e Tecnologia Móvel. Anais Eletrônico: IX EPCC - Encontro Internacional de Produção Científica Unicesumar (pp. 7–10). Unicesumar: Maringá-PR.Google Scholar
  4. Freifeld, C. C., Chunara, R., Mekaru, S. R., Chan, E. H., Kass-Hout, T., Iacucci, A. A., et al. (2010). Participatory epidemiology: Use of mobile phones for community-based health reporting. PLoS Medicine, 7(12), 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000376.
  5. Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L. (2009). Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature, 457(7232), 1012–1014.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07634.
  6. Gluskin, R. T., Johansson, M. A., Santillana, M., & Brownstein, J. S. (2014). Evaluation of internet-based dengue query data: Google dengue trends. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 8(2), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, J. K., Moreland-Russell, S., Choucair, B., Mansour, R., Staub, M., & Simmons, K. (2014). Tweeting for and against public health policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health’s electronic cigarette Twitter campaign. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(10), e238.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heintze, C., Garrido, M. V., & Kroeger, A. (2007). What do community-based dengue control programmes achieve? A systematic review of published evaluations. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 101(4), 317–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lwin, M. O., Vijaykumar, S., Rathnayake, V. S., Lim, G., Panchapakesan, C., Foo, S., et al. (2016). A social media mHealth solution to address the needs of dengue prevention and management in Sri Lanka. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(7), e149.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pérez, D., Lefèvre, P., Sánchez, L., Sánchez, L. M., Boelaert, M., Kourí, G., et al. (2007). Community participation in Aedes aegypti control: A sociological perspective on five years of research in the health area “26 de Julio”, Havana, Cuba. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 12(5), 664–672.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01833.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Quintero, J., Brochero, H., Manrique-Saide, P., Barrera-Pérez, M., Basso, C., Romero, S., et al. (2014). Ecological, biological and social dimensions of dengue vector breeding in five urban settings of Latin America: A multi-country study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 14, 38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rheingold, H. (2003). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Seltzer, E. K., Jean, N. S., Kramer-Golinkoff, E., Asch, D. A., & Merchant, R. M. (2015). The content of social media’s shared images about Ebola: A retrospective study. Public Health, 129(9), 1273–1277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shen, F., Ahern, L., & Baker, M. (2014). Stories that count: Influence of news narratives on issue attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(1), 98–117.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013514414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Signorini, A., Segre, A. M., & Polgreen, P. M. (2011). The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 6(5).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019467.
  17. Sjöberg, C., & Timpka, T. (1998). Participatory design of information systems in health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5(2), 177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Southwell, B. G., Dolina, S., Jimenez-Magdaleno, K., Squiers, L. B., & Kelly, B. J. (2016). Zika virus-related news coverage and online behavior, United States, Guatemala, and Brazil. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 22(7), 1320–1321.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.160415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Velho, A. P. M., Domingues, D., Lucena, T. F. R., & Dorne, V. D. (2016). ‘Jornalismo etnográfico: um relato de mobilização contra a dengue (Ethnographic journalism: A dengue mobilization report)’. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Jornalismo, 6(18), 121–136. Available at http://www.fnpj.org.br/rebej/ojs/index.php/rebej/article/view/426/282.
  20. Vijaykumar, S., Lwin, M. O., Theng, Y.-L., Foo, S., Cheong, S. A., et al. (2016, February). A social media-based participatory epidemiology approach for vector-borne disease prevention (VBDP) in South Asia, eTELEMED 2013: The Fifth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine and Social Medicine, 194–197. https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10220/10053.
  21. Waegemann, C. P. (2010). mHealth: The next generation of telemedicine? Telemedicine and e-Health, 16(1), 23–25.  https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2010.9990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weibel, P. (2015). Global activism: Art and conflict in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wesolowski, A., Eagle, N., Tatem, A. J., Smith, D. L., Noor, A. M., Snow, R. W., et al. (2012). Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria. Science, 338(6104), 267–270.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. World Health Organization. (2009). ‘Dengue: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control’. Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, X, 147.Google Scholar
  25. WHO | World Health Organization. (2012). Global strategy for dengue prevention and control 2012–2020, World Health Organiszation, Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: WHO. Available at http://www.who.int/denguecontrol/9789241504034/en/.
  26. WHO | World Health Organization. (2016). Neglected tropical diseases, WHO. World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/diseases/en/ [accessed 10 November 2016].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiago Franklin Rodrigues Lucena
    • 1
  • Ana Paula Machado Velho
    • 2
  • Vinicius Durval Dorne
    • 3
  • Diana Maria Gallicchio Domingues
    • 4
  1. 1.Health Promotion Graduate ProgramUniCesumar and ICETI-Cesumar Institute of Science, Technology, and InnovationParanáBrazil
  2. 2.State University of MaringáParanáBrazil
  3. 3.Federal University of UberlandiaMinas GeraisBrazil
  4. 4.Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Gama–UnB and Science and Health Technologies Graduate ProgramCeilandiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations