Advertisement

Domestic Abuse: Predicting, Assessing and Responding to Risk in the Criminal Justice System and Beyond

  • Aviah Sarah DayEmail author
  • Angela Jenner
  • Ruth Weir
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter brings together early findings from three Ph.D. projects on domestic abuse, each taking a different approach. The first explores the issues of underreporting and predictors of risk; the second focuses on the police response to domestic abuse, highlighting gaps in service provision to victims; and the final project looks at specialist courts and the work of independent domestic violence advisors. This chapter forms a body of research with the potential to make a significant contribution to the field. Indeed, the motivation for each of the projects is to add to current efforts to improve responses to domestic abuse within the criminal justice system and beyond, focusing on ways in which practitioners might predict, assess and respond to risk in relation to domestic abuse.

References

  1. Allard, P. (2002). Life sentences: Denying welfare benefits to women convicted of drug offenses. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
  2. Ariza, J. J. M., Robinson, A., & Myhill, A. (2016). Cheaper, faster, better: Expectations and achievements in police risk assessment of domestic abuse. Policing, 10(4).Google Scholar
  3. Beyer, K., et al. (2015). Neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(1), 16–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen, E. (2011). An overview of partner violence risk assessment and the potential of female victim risk appraisals. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 16, 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bumiller, K. (2008). In an abusive state: How neoliberalism appropriated the feminist movement against sexual violence. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Casey, P. M., & Rottman, D. B. (2003). Problem-solving courts: Models and trends. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
  8. Chainey, S., & Ratcliffe, J. (2005). GIS and crime mapping. London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit. (2012). Women’s journeys in response to domestic violence. Available at: http://www.cwasu.org/.
  10. Chesney-Lind, M. (1989). Girls’ crime and woman’s place: Toward a feminist model of female delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 3(10), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. College of Policing. (2015). Leadership Review, [online]. Available at: http://www.college.police.uk/leadershipreview (Accessed 5 August 2015).
  13. College of Policing. (2016). Authorised professional practice: Understanding risk and vulnerability in the context of domestic abuse. Available at: https://www.app.college.police.uk/legal-information/.
  14. Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the risk society. Oxford: Clarenden Press.Google Scholar
  15. Farley, N. A. (1996). Survey of factors contributing to gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 4(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flatley, J. (2016). Intimate personal violence and partner abuse. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  17. Fotheringham, S. A., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationship. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Gracia, E., López-Quílez, A., Marco, M., Lladosa, S., & Lila, M. (2014). Exploring neighborhood influences on small-area variations in intimate partner violence risk: A bayesian random-effects modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(1), 866–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenfield, L. A., & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC. NCJ175688.
  20. Hanmer, J., Radner, J., & Stanko, E. A. (1989/2013). Women, policing and male violence: International perspectives. Routledge revivals. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Harwin, N. (2006). Putting a stop to domestic violence in the United Kingdom: Challenges and opportunities. Violence Against Women, 12(6), 556–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary. (2014). Everybody’s business: Improving police response to domestic violence. Available at: www.hmic.gov.uk.
  23. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary. (2015). PEEL: Police effectiveness 2015 (vulnerability)—An inspection of Essex Police. Available at: https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/wp-content/uploads/police-effectiveness-vulnerability-2015-essex.pdf.
  24. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary. (2017). Essex Police (profile). Available at: http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic/essex/.
  25. Hester, M. (2009, June). Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators. Violence Against Women Research Group School for Policy Studies University of Bristol, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813479078.
  26. Holder, R. (1999). Creating an unholy alliance: Inter-agency developments on domestic violence in Hammersmith and Fulham. In N. Harwin, G. Hague, & E. Malos (Eds.), The multi-agency approach to domestic violence: New opportunities, old challenges? London: Whiting and Birch Ltd.Google Scholar
  27. Home Office. (2005). Domestic violence: A national report. London.Google Scholar
  28. Home Office. (2013). New government domestic violence and abuse definition. Circular 003/2013.Google Scholar
  29. Hoyle, C. (2008). Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence cases. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Local Government Association. (2015). Whole place. Available at: http://www.local.gov.uk/community-budgets/-/journal_content/56/10180/3692233/ARTICLE.
  31. Loftus, B. (2009). Police culture in a changing world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence: Criminal justice professionals and service providers respond. Violence Against Women, 7, 1339–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, S. L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women’s violence in relationships. New York: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mooney, J. (1999). The North London domestic violence survey. Centre for Criminology: Middlesex University.Google Scholar
  35. Myhill, A., & Johnson, K. (2015). Police use of discretion in response to domestic violence. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 16(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newburn, T., & Stanko, E. A. (2002). When men are victims: The failure of victimology and victim services. In T. Newburn & E. A. Stanko (Eds.), Just boys doing business? Men, masculinities and crime. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Office for National Statistics. (2015). Crime statistics, focus on violent crime and sexual offences, 2013/14. Chapter 4: Violent crime and sexual offences—Intimate personal violence and serious sexual assault. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_394500.pdf.
  38. Radford, L., & Gill, A. (2006). Losingthe plot? Researching community safety partnership work against domestic violence. The Howard Journal, 45(4), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Radford, J., & Stanko, E. (1995). Violence against women and children. In M. Hester, L. Kelly, & J. Radford (Eds.), Women, violence and male power (pp. 65–68). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Richards, L. in partnership with CAADA. (2009). Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harrasment and Honour Based Violence (DASH 2009) risk identification and assessment and management model. Available at: http://www.dashriskchecklist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/DASH-2009.pdf.
  41. Richards, L. (2016). DASH risk model. Available at: http://www.dashriskchecklist.co.uk/.
  42. Richie, B. E. (2012, May 22). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Robinson, A. L., & Howarth, E. (2012). Judging risk: Key determinants in British domestic violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(8), 1489–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shepard, M. F., & Pence, E. L. (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Sweet, E. L. (2016). Carceral feminism. Dialogues in Human Geography, 6(2), 202–205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820616655041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thiara, R., & Gill, A. (2009). Violence against women in South Asian communities: Issues for policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  47. Uhrig, N. (2016). Black, Asian and minority ethnic disproportionality in the criminal justice system in England and Wales. Ministry of Justice Analytical Services.Google Scholar
  48. Walby, S. (2009). The cost of domestic violence up-date 2009. Lancaster University. Available at: www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/sociology/Cost_of_domestic_violence_update.doc.
  49. Walby, S., Towers, J., & Francis, B. (2015). Is violent crime increasing or decreasing? A new methodology to measure repeat attacks making visible the significance of gender and domestic relations. The British Journal of Criminology, 56(6), 1203–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walklate, S. (2008). What is to be done about violence against women? Gender, violence, cosmopolitanism and the law. British Journal of Criminology, 48(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EssexLondonUK
  2. 2.London Metropolitan UniversityEssexUK
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations