Advertisement

Quality and Basic Biomedical Research

  • Antonella Lanati
Chapter

Abstract

In Chap.  3, we have seen how any organisation can apply a management model that follows total quality management principles and implement a quality management system with the aim of improving effectiveness and efficiency. International guidelines for certification and accreditation are dedicated to specific fields only and did not include basic scientific research at the time of their drafting. To effectively apply quality principles to this field, we need to find the relevant references and translate and transfer the terms and directions. Starting from the definition of quality in biomedical research and the citing of the most important references for that field, Chap.  4 illustrates how quality is applied in the running of scientific projects, giving directions and practical examples for most aspects of quality management, from organisation and documentation to physical resources and ethics.

Keywords

Conscious management QPBR GXP Organisation Resource management Validation Documentation Storage Products Research environment Health and safety Publications Ethics 

References

  1. 1.
    WHO: WHO-TDR handbook: quality practices in basic biomedical research. 2010. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/quality_practices.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  2. 2.
    A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® guide). Project Management Institute (PMI). 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robins MM, Scarll SJ, Key PE. Quality assurance in research laboratories. Accred Qual Assur. 2006;11:214–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0129-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies R. Good Research Practice: it is time to do what others think we do. Quasar-RQA. 2013;124:21–3.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pentland A. The new science of building great teams: Harv Bus Rev; 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    RQA working party on quality in non-regulated research. Guidelines for quality in non-regulated scientific research booklet. RQA. 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eaker S, et al. Concise review: guidance in developing commercializable autologous/patient-specific cell therapy manufacturing. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013;2(11):871–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    UK Government: joint code of practice for research (JCoPR). 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/joint-code-of-practice-for-research-jcopr. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Research Councils UK: RCUK policy and guidelines on governance of good research conduct. 2017. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/reviews/grc/rcukpolicyguidelinesgovernancegoodresearchconduct-pdf/. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  11. 11.
    ESF: the European code of conduct for research integrity. http://www.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  12. 12.
    Universitat de Barcelona: code of good research practices. 2010. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/28544. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  13. 13.
    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona: quality policy. 2015. http://www.uab.cat/web/research/itineraries/uab-research/quality-policy-1345681372276.html. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  14. 14.
    Tanner R. Motivation—applying Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory. 2017. https://managementisajourney.com/motivation-applying-maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-theory/. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  15. 15.
    US Food and Drug Administration: analytical procedures and methods validation for drugs and biologics. 2015. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm386366.pdf. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  16. 16.
    Annesley TM. Who, what, when, where, how, and why: the ingredients in the recipe for a successful methods section. Clin Chem. 2010;56(6):897–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    US Food and Drug Administration: guidance for industry-good laboratory practices-questions and answers. 2007. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ICECI/EnforcementActions/BioresearchMonitoring/UCM133748.pdf. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  18. 18.
    US Food and Drug Administration: 1981 questions & answers-good laboratory practice regulations. 2007. http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/Inspections/NonclinicalLaboratoriesInspectedunderGoodLaboratoryPractices/ucm072738.htm. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  19. 19.
    OECD: OECD series on principles of good laboratory practice (GLP) and compliance monitoring. 1995–2006. http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/oecdseriesonprinciplesofgoodlaboratorypracticeglpandcompliancemonitoring.htm. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  20. 20.
    Dance A. Authorship: who’s on first? Nature. 2012;489:591–3.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7417-591a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    WHO: laboratory biosafety manual. 3rd ed. 2004. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/biosafety/Biosafety7.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 18 Sep 2017.
  22. 22.
    UCL: UCL code of conduct for research. 2013. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/srs/governance-and-committees/resgov/code-of-conduct-research. Accessed 13 Sep 2017.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Freedman LP, et al. The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(6):e1002165.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bongiovanni A, et al. Applying quality and project management methodologies in biomedical research laboratories: a public research network’s case study. Accred Qual Assur. 2015;20(3):203–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1132-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonella Lanati
    • 1
  1. 1.Valore QualitàPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations