Korea: Culture and Reality

  • Anna VeselovaEmail author
  • Liudmila Veselova
Part of the Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets book series (PSIEM)


This chapter presents the role of talent management in creating and supporting sustainable competitive advantage of firms from Korea. We provide various examples showing how talent management practices may contribute to a firm’s competitive advantage in the Korean context. Special attention is paid to the identification of a number of specific talent management practices, which influence competitive advantages in this particular context.


  1. Bae, Johngseok, and John J. Lawler. 2000. Organizational and HRM Strategies in Korea: Impact on Firm Performance in an Emerging Economy. Academy of Management Journal 43 (3): 502–517.Google Scholar
  2. Bae, Johngseok, Shyh-Jer Chen, and Chris Rowley. 2011. From a Paternalistic Model Towards What? HRM Trends in Korea and Taiwan. Personnel Review 40 (6): 700–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brokaw, Alex. 2016. Samsung Wants to Reform Its Culture to Be More Like a Startup. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  4. Burnell, Max. 2017. 5 Stunning Stats About Samsung. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  5. Choi, Jong-Tae. 2004. Transformation of Korean HRM Based on Confucian Values. Seoul Journal of Business 10 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  6. Choy, Danny. 2012. Hyundai Hunts Big Three in Global Sales Race. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  7. Cook, Terry. 2009. Korean Unions End SsangYong Occupation on Company Terms. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  8. Craft. 2017. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  9. Hübner, Carsten. 2014. Unfair Play! Labour Relations at Hyundai: A Critical Review. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  10. ———. 2017c. Teaching the Art of Customer Service.
  11. Hyundai Motor Group. 2017. Human Resource Development. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  12. Kim, Min-kyung. 2015. Six Years After Layoffs, Ssangyong Workers Keep Passing Away. The Hankyoreh. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  13. Kim, Yoo-chul. 2016. Hierarchical System to Be Reformed with Leadership Shift. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  14. Koh, Angela. 2014. Korean Companies’ Selection Criteria for Expat Professionals. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  15. Lansbury, Russell D., Seung-Ho Kwon, and Chunk-Sok Suh. 2006. Globalization and Employment Relations in the Korean Auto Industry: The Case of the Hyundai Motor Company in Korea, Canada and India. Asia Pacific Business Review 12 (2): 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, Eun-Suk, and Seongsu Kim. 2006. Best Practices and Performance-Based HR System in Korea. Seoul Journal of Business 12 (1): 3–17.Google Scholar
  17. Miles, Lilian. 2008. The Significance of Cultural Norms in the Evolution of Korean HRM Practices. International Journal of Law and Management 50 (1): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Strategy and Finance. 2017. 3-Year Plan for Economic Innovation. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  19. MyAutoWorld. 2017. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  20. OECD. 2017. Employment Outlook 2017. How Does Korea Compare. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  21. Park, Hyun-jung, and Hyun-woong Noh. 2016. Ssangyong Announces Plan Allowing Dismissed Employees to Return to Work. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  22. Park, Young-bum, Byoung Lee, and Seog-Hun Woo. 1997. Employment Relations in the Korean Automotive Industry: Issues and Policy Implications. Economic and Labour Relations Review 8 (2).
  23. R&R Research. 2017. Evolving Business Strategy of Samsung. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  24. Rowley, Chris, and Johngseok Bae. 2004. Human Resource Management in South Korea After the Asian Financial Crisis: Emerging Patterns from the Labyrinth. International Studies of Management & Organization 34 (1): 52–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Samsung Asset Management. 2017. Code of Conduct. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  26. Samsung Electronics. 2009. Sustainability Report 2008–2009. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  27. SuccessStory. 2017a. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  28. ———. 2017b. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  29. Tung, Rosalie L., Yongsun Paik, and Johngseok Bae. 2013. Korean Human Resource Management in the Global Context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24 (5): 905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. U.S. News. 2017. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  31. Villegas, Faviola. 2017. Case Study: Hyundai and Kia in Mexico. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of ManagementSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.School of International RelationsSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations