Advertisement

Error Management in the German Armed Forces’ Military Aviation

  • Peter Klement
Chapter

Abstract

Based on his extensive knowledge gained in leading positions of military aviation, the author demonstrates that reaching, and sometimes even exceeding, the limits of human capacity plays an increasingly crucial role in incidents involving modern and highly complex systems. As a result, the author states, we have to realize that people—even when they are qualified personnel—err and cannot prevail in all critical situations. In addition, one person alone will no longer be able to handle the mass of data contained in highly complex systems. Instead, individual experts must turn into communicative team players. This requires that soft as well as hard skills have to be continuously trained and evaluated.

References

  1. Australian National Transport Commission. 2004. Fatigue management within the rail industry: Review of regulatory approach. Melbourne: Australian National Transport Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Badke-Schaub, P., G. Hofinger, and C. Lauche. 2008. Human factors, Psychologie sicheren Handelns in Risikobranchen. N.p.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, G., D. Besnard, and Captain D. Riley. 2007. Cognitive mismatches in the cockpit: Will they ever be a thing of the past? N.p.Google Scholar
  4. Bundeswehr. 2006. CRM Konzept – Deutsche Luftwaffe. N.p.Google Scholar
  5. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile. 2012. Final report Flight AF 447, July. N.p.Google Scholar
  6. Darley, J.M., and B. Latané. 1968. Bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 (4): 377–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dinges, D.F., F. Pack, K. Williams, K.A. Gillen, J.W. Powell, G.E. Ott, C. Aptowicz, and A.I. Pack. 1997. Cumulative sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor vigilance performance decrements during a week of sleep restricted to 4-5 hours per night. Sleep 20 (4): 267–277.Google Scholar
  8. Endsley. 1995. Torward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factor 37 (1): 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Aviation Safety Agency. 2015. Annual safety review 2014. N.p.Google Scholar
  10. European Cockpit Association. 2012. Pilot fatigue barometer. N.p.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. 1901. Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Reprint 1948. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.Google Scholar
  12. Gauss, C.F. 1823. Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae. Commentations societ. reg. Scient. Götting. rec. Vol. V. hrsg. 1880 von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft. Leibzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  13. Hobbs, A., K.B. Avers, and J.J. Hiles. 2011. Fatigue risk management in aviation maintenance: Current best practices and potential future countermeasures. Technical report No. DOT/FAA/AM-11/10, Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
  14. International Air Transport Association. 2016, February 5. International Air Transport Association releases 2015 safety performance. N.p.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, D.G., and M.R. Ensley. 1996. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67 (6): 507–512.Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  17. Millar, M. 2012. Technical officer (human performance), ICAO. Measuring fatigue Asia-Pacific FRMS Seminar. Bangkok.Google Scholar
  18. Necker, I.A. 1832. Ueber einige merkwürdige optische Phänomene. Annalen der Physik 103 (3): 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rasmussen, J. 1982. Human errors: A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. Journal of Occupational Accidents 4 (2–4): 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reason, J. 2000. Human error: Models and management. BMJ: British Medical Journal 320 (7237): 768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sumerauer, A. 2016. Was bedeutet Verantwortlichkeit. Sachverständige Heft 1.Google Scholar
  22. Waller M.J., and K.H. Roberts. 2003. High reliability and organizational behavior: finally the twain must meet. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (7): 813–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zapf, D., and J.T. Reason. 1994. Human errors and error handling. An introduction. Applied Psychology: An International Review 43: 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zapf, D., M. Frese., and F.C. Brodbeck. 1999. Fehler und Fehlermanagement. N.p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Klement
    • 1
  1. 1.CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations