Advertisement

The Entrepreneurial Function

Coauthored with Owen Sims
  • Robert P. Gilles
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter brings together well-established perspectives on entrepreneurship as well as a new perspective of the entrepreneurial function that conforms with the analytical framework of a socio-economic space. Entrepreneurship is effected through the disruption of the governing institutional framework with institutional innovations. These innovations can be progressive as well as regressive. If individuals introduce innovative institutions through new goods, new production technologies or new trading practices, one might refer to these individuals as “entrepreneurs”. But entrepreneurship can also be collective. This chapter considers at length the rise of the House of Medici in Florentine Renaissance society through financial entrepreneurship (the Medici Bank) as well as entrepreneurial political networking.

References

  1. Abrutyn, S. 2013. Revisiting Institutionalism in Sociology: Putting the “Institution” Back in Institutional Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D. 1995. Reward Structures and the Allocation of Talent. European Economic Review 39: 17–33.Google Scholar
  3. Acemoglu, D., and J.A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  4. Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1992. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1998. A Schumpeterian Perspective on Growth and Competition. In New Theories in Growth and Development, ed. F. Coricelli, M. Di Matteo, and F. Hahn, chap. 1, 9–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aldrich, H.E. 2005. Entrepreneurship. In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, ed. N.J. Smelser and R. Swedberg, chap. 20, 2nd ed., 451–477. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aldrich, H.E., and M.A. Martinez. 2007. Many are Called, But Few are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the Study of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 3: 293–311.Google Scholar
  8. Barabási, A.-L. 2016. Network Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barker, J. 2014. England, Arise: The People, the King and the Great Revolt of 1381. London: Little, Brown Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Baumol, W.J. 1968. Entrepreneurship in Economic and Theory. American Economic Review 58: 64–71.Google Scholar
  11. Baumol, W. 1983. Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure. American Economic Review 72: 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Baumol, W. 1990. Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy 98: 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumol, W. 2002. The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Baumol, W.J., R.E. Litan, and C.J. Schramm. 2007. Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, and the Economics of Growth and Prosperity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Becker, M.C., and T. Knudsen. 2003. The Entrepreneur at a Crucial Juncture in Schumpeter’s Work: Schumpeter’s 1928 Handbook Entry. ‘Entrepreneur’. Advances in Austrian Economics 6: 199–233.Google Scholar
  16. Becker, M.C., T. Knudsen, and J.G. March. 2006. Schumpeter, Winter, and the Sources of Novelty. Industrial and Corporate Change 15: 353–371.Google Scholar
  17. Boettke, P.J., and C.J. Coyne. 2009. Context Matters: Institutions and Entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 5 (3): 135–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brownlow, G. 2015. Back to the Failure: An Analytic Narrative of the DeLorean Debacle. Business History 57 (1): 156–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buchanan, J.M. 1980. Rent Seeking and Profit Seeking. In Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, ed. J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, and G. Tullock, 3–15. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Buchanan, J.M., and G. Tullock. 1965. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Burt, R.S. 1976. Positions in Networks. Social Forces 55: 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Burt, R.S. 2004. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Burt, R.S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Burt, R.S. 2010. Neighbour Networks: Competitive Advantages Local and Personal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cagetti, M., and M. De Nardi. 2009. Estate Taxation, Entrepreneurship, and Wealth. American Economic Review 99 (1): 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chaplin, D. 2016. The Medici: Rise of a Parvenu Dynasty, 1360–1537. London: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  28. Coase, R.H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crotty, J. 2009. Structural Causes of the Global Financial Crisis: A Critical Assessment of the ‘New Financial Architecture’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33: 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dahl, R. 1961. Who Governs?. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. De Jong, A., D. Higgins, and H. van Driel. 2012. New Business History? An Invitation to Discuss, Mimeo. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  32. de Roover, R. 1946. The Medici Bank Financial and Commercial Operations. Journal of Economic History 6: 153–172.Google Scholar
  33. Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. DiMaggio, P. 1988. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, ed. L.G. Zucker. Cambridge: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  35. Eisenstadt, S.N. 1980. Cultural Orientations, Institutional Entrepreneurs and Social Change: Comparative Analysis of Traditional Civilizations. American Journal of Sociology 85: 840–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Emerson, R.M. 1962. Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review 27: 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Evans, D., and B. Jovanovic. 1989. An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints. Journal of Political Economy 97: 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gilles, R.P., and D. Diamantaras. 2003. To Trade or Not to Trade: Economies with a Variable Number of Tradeables. International Economic Review 44: 1173–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilles, R.P., E.A. Lazarova, and P.H.M. Ruys. 2015. Stability in a Network Economy: The Role of Institutions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 119: 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Granovetter, M. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Granovetter, M. 1983. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory 1: 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grossman, H., and O.D. Hart. 1983. An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem. Econometrica 51: 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hart, O.D., and J. Moore. 1990. Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1119–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Henrekson, M., and T. Sanandaji. 2011. The Interaction of Entrepreneurship and Institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics 7: 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hibbert, C. 1980. The House of Medici: Its Rise and Fall. Paperback ed. New York, NY: Morrow Quill.Google Scholar
  46. Hindle, T. 2008. Guide to Management Ideas and Gurus. London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  47. Howitt, P., and P. Aghion. 1998. Capital Accumulation and Innovation as Complementary Factors in Long-Run Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 2: 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hwang, H., and W.W. Powell. 2005. Institutions and Entrepreneurship. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, ed. S.A. Alvarez, R. Agarwal, and O. Sorenson, 179–210. Amsterdam: Kluwer Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Kihlstrom, R.E., and J.-J. Laffont. 1979. A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion. Journal of Political Economy 87: 719–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirzner, I.M. 1979. Perception, Opportunity and Profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Knight, F.H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  52. Knight, F. 1935. The Ethics of Competition. New Brunswick, NJ: Harper Press.Google Scholar
  53. Krakovsky, M. 2015. The Middleman Economy: How Brokers, Agents, Dealers, and Everyday Matchmakers Create Value and Profit. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Lazear, E.P. 2002. Entrepreneurship. NBER Working Papers, No. 9109.Google Scholar
  55. Lazear, E. 2004. Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship. American Economic Review 94 (2): 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lucas, R.E. 1978. On the Size Distribution of Business Firms. The Bell Journal of Economics 9: 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. März, E. 1991. Joseph Schumpeter: Scholar, Teacher and Politician. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Murphy, K.M., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1991. The Allocation of Talent: Implications for Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Newman, M.E.J. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Padgett, J.F., and C.K. Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peretto, P.F. 1998. Technological Change, Market Rivalry, and the Evolution of the Capitalist Engine of Growth. Journal of Economic Development 3: 53–80.Google Scholar
  62. Sanandaji, T., and P.T. Leeson. 2013. Billionaires. Industrial and Corporate Change 22 (1): 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sanders, M. 2007. Scientific Paradigms, Entrepreneurial Opportunities, and Cycles in Economic Growth. Small Business Economics 28: 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmitz, J.A. 1989. Imitation, Entrepreneurship, and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy 97: 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schumpeter, J. 1926. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. 2nd ed. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
  66. Schumpeter, J. 1928. The Instability of Capitalism. The Economic Journal 38: 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schumpeter, J. 1929. Der Unternehmer in der Volkswirtschaft von heute. In Strukturwandlungen der Deutschen Volkswirtschaft, Vol. 1, ed. B. Harms, 303–326. Berlin: Reimar Hobbing.Google Scholar
  68. Schumpeter, J. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York, NY: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
  70. Schumpeter, J. 2003. The Theory of Economic Development. In Joseph Alois Schumpeter: Entrepreneurship, Style and Vision, ed. J.G. Backhaus, chap. 3, 61–116. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. Schumpeter, J. 2005. Development. Journal of Economic Literature 43: 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shane, S., E.A. Locke, and C.J. Collins. 2003. Entrepreneurial Motivation. Human Resource Management Review 13: 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sims, O. 2017. Entrepreneurship and Wealth Generation in Socially Structured Economies. Ph.D. thesis, Queen’s University, Belfast.Google Scholar
  74. Smelser, N.J., and R. Swedberg. 2005. The Handbook of Economic Sociology. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, A. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. by K. Haakonssen. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprint 2002.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Reprint 1976.Google Scholar
  77. Wennekers, S., and R. Thurik. 1999. Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Small Business Economics 13: 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Witt, U. 2002. How Evolutionary Is Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development? Industry and Innovation 9: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert P. Gilles
    • 1
  1. 1.Management SchoolQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations