Advertisement

Synapse as a Memristor

  • Weiran Cai
  • Ronald TetzlaffEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The memristor, the fourth fundamental electric element, was conceptually proposed by L. Chua in 1971 and was found in laboratory late in 2008. Recently a special type of memristor was considered to be able to mimic the behavior of neural synapses. In particular, attributed to the long-term memory of weight changes, the memristor can reproduce the spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) protocol of a synapse, displaying a synaptic modification related to the time interval of pre- and post-synaptic spikes. Not limited to it, we found that the memristor with adaptive thresholds can even mimic higher-order behavior of synapses, realizing the well-known suppression principle of Froemke. This type of memristor can actually express both long-term and short-term plasticities in synapses, which are responsible for the excitation level and the refractory time, respectively. The corresponding dynamical process is governed by a set of ordinary differential equations. Interestingly, the Froemke’s model and our memristor-like model, based on two completely different mechanisms, are found to be quantitatively equivalent. In this chapter we would like to provide this new perspective of looking at synaptic dynamics.

References

  1. 1.
    Hodgkin, A.L., Huxley, A.F.: A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117(4), 500–544 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chua, L.O.: Memristor-the missing circuit element. IEEE Trans. Circ. Theor. 18(5), 507–519 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chua, L.O., Kang, S.M.:. Memristive devices and systems. Proc. IEEE 64, 209–223 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zamarreño-Ramos, C., Camuñas-Mesa, L.A., Pérez-Carrasco, J.A., Masquelier, T., Serrano-Gotarredona, T., Linares-Barranco, B.: On spike-timing-dependent-plasticity, memristive devices, and building a self-learning visual cortex. Front. Neurosci. 5(26) (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pérez-Carrasco, J.A., Zamarreño-Ramos, C., Serrano-Gotarredona, T., Linares-Barranco, B.: On neuromorphic spiking architectures for asynchronous STDP mem-ristive systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE ISCAS, pp. 1659–1662 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerstner, W., Kempter, R., van Hemmen, J.L., Wagner, H.: A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature 383, 76–78 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerstner, W.: Spiking neurons. In: Maass, W., Bishop, C.M. (eds.) Pulsed Neural Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kempter, R., Gerstner, W., van Hemmen, J.L.: Hebbian learning and spiking neurons. Phys. Rev. E 59, 4498–4514 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dayan, P., Abbott, L.F.: Theoretical Neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hebb, D.O.: The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. Wiley, New York (1949)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bi, G.Q., Poo, M.M.: Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci. 18, 10464–10472 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, H.X., Gerkin, R.C., Nauen, D.W., Bi, G.Q.: Coactivation and timing-dependent integration of synaptic potentiation and depression. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 187–193 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Froemke, R.C., Dan, Y.: Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature 416, 433–438 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cai, W., Tetzlaff, R.: Neuronal synapse as a memristor: modeling pair- and triplet-based STDP rule. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 9(1), 87–95 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M.: Principles of Neural Science, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pershin, Y.V., Di Ventra, M.: Neuromorphic, digital, and quantum computation with memory circuit elements. Proc. IEEE 100, 2071–80 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pershin, Y.V., Di Ventra, M.: Experimental demonstration of associative memory with memristive neural networks. Neural Netw. 23, 881–886 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pershin, Y.V., Di Ventra, M.: Practical approach to programmable analog circuits with memristors. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. I: Reg. Pap. 57, 1857–1864 (2010)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultaet Elektrotechnik und InformationstechnikTechnische Universitaet DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations