Advertisement

The Late Modern Reimagining of Imagination

  • Ulla Kallenbach
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers an analysis of the radical reconceptualization of imagination in the early to mid-twentieth century, chiefly as interpreted by French philosophers such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Gaston Bachelard and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Central interests in this period are the notions of absence and nothingness, which are also evident in the theatre, not only as themes but also as form. Accordingly, the reconceptualization of imagination was concerned both with the notion of imagination as nothingness and with finding new ways of describing potentials of imagination in this nothingness—as an intentional mode of consciousness. Kallenbach analyzes how this reconceptualization of imagination puts into question the relation of the present to the absent; a complex relation that exposes both the power and poverty of the imagination.

References

  1. Artaud, Antonin. The Theatre and Its Double. Translated by Victor Corti. Oneworld Classics. 2nd ed. Richmond: Oneworld Classics, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, Gaston. On Poetic Imagination and Reverie. Translated by Colette Gaudin. Revised ed. Putnam, Connecticut: Spring Publications, 2005. 1971.Google Scholar
  3. ———. The Poetics of Space [La poétique de l’espace]. Boston: Beacon Press, 1994. 1958.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, Samuel. Three Novels: Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable. 2nd ed. New York: Grove Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchot, Maurice. The Space of Literature [L’Espace litteraire]. Translated by Ann Smock. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989. 1955.Google Scholar
  6. ———. The Work of Fire [La Part du feu]. Translated by Charlotte Mandell. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995. 1949.Google Scholar
  7. Braga, Corin. ““Imagination”, “Imaginaire”, “Imaginal”: Three Concepts for Defining Creative Fantasy.” Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 6, no. 16 (2007): 59–68.Google Scholar
  8. Brann, Eva T. H. The World of the Imagination: Sum and Substance. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus [Le mythe de Sisyphe]. Translated by Justin O’Brien. London: Penguin, 2000. 1942.Google Scholar
  10. Casey, Edward S. Imagining: A Phenomenological Study. Studies in Phenomenological and Existential Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Clack, Beverley. “After Freud: Phantasy and Imagination in the Philosophy of Religion.” Philosophy Compass 3, no. 1 (2008): 203–21.Google Scholar
  12. Courtney, Richard. “Imagination and the Dramatic Act: Comments on Sartre, Ryle, and Furlong.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 30, no. 2 (1971): 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, Anthony. Social Theory since Freud Traversing Social Imaginaries. London, New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Esslin, Martin. The Theatre of the Absurd. 3rd ed. London: Methuen, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. Fortier, Mark. Theory/Theatre: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. Freud, Sigmund. “Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 141–53. London: Hogarth Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  17. Grimsley, Ronald. “Two Philosophical Views of the Literary Imagination: Sartre and Bachelard.” Comparative Literature Studies 8, no. 1 (1971): 42–57.Google Scholar
  18. Halling, Steen. “The Imaginative Constituent in Interpersonal Living: Empathy, Illusion, and Will.” In Imagination and Phenomenological Psychology, edited by Edward L. Murray, 140–74. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. Hans, James S. “Gaston Bachelard and the Phenomenology of the Reading Consciousness.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35, no. 3 (1977): 315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. Kitchener, Ontario, Canada: Batoche Books, 1999. 1739–40.Google Scholar
  21. Haase, Ullrich, and William Large. Maurice Blanchot. Routledge Critical Thinkers. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Innes, Christopher Holy Theatre Ritual and the Avant Garde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. Ionesco, Eugène. Notes and Counter-Notes [Notes et contre-notes]. Translated by Donald Watson. London: John Calder, 1964. 1962.Google Scholar
  24. Ionesco, Eugène, and Leonard C. Pronko. “Notes on My Theatre.” The Tulane Drama Review 7, no. 3 (1963): 127–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iser, Wolfgang. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983. 3.Google Scholar
  26. Kearney, Richard. Poetics of Imagining: Modern to Post-Modern. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1998. 1991.Google Scholar
  27. Lyotard, Jean-François. Phenomenology [La Phénoménologie]. Translated by Brian Beakley. Suny Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy. New York: State University New York Press, 1991. 1954.Google Scholar
  28. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. “Eye and Mind.” Translated by Michael B. Smith. In The Continental Aesthetics Reader, edited by Clive Cazeaux, 451–76. London, New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. ———. Phenomenology of Perception [Phénoménologie de la perception]. Translated by Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge, 2012. 1945.Google Scholar
  30. ———. The Visible and the Invisible, Followed by Working Notes [Le Visible et l’invisible]. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968. 1964.Google Scholar
  31. Nietzsche, Friedrich. “On Truth and Lie in an Extramoral Sense.” Translated by Michael B. Smith. In The Continental Aesthetics Reader, edited by Clive Cazeaux, 62–76. London, New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
  32. Ricoeur, Paul. “The Function of Fiction in Shaping Reality.” Man and World 12, no. 2 (1979): 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind. 60th anniversary ed. London: Routledge, 2009. 1949.Google Scholar
  34. Sartre, Jean-Paul. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination [L’imaginaire: psychologie phénoménologique de l’imagination]. Translated by Jonathan Webber. London: Routledge, 2004. 1940.Google Scholar
  35. ———. Imagination: A Psychological Critique [L’imagination]. Translated by Forrest Williams. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962. 1936.Google Scholar
  36. ———. Sartre on Theater. New York: Pantheon Books, 1976.Google Scholar
  37. Shorter, J. M. “Imagination.” Mind 61, no. 244 (1952): 528–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stanislavski, Constantin. An Actor Prepares. Translated by Elizabeth Reynolds Hapgood. London, New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
  39. Steiner, Riccardo. Unconscious Phantasy. Psychoanalytic Ideas Series. London: Karnac, 2003.Google Scholar
  40. Warnock, Mary. Imagination. London: Faber and Faber, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulla Kallenbach
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations