Advertisement

How Many Ghettos Can We Count? Identifying Roma Neighbourhoods in Romanian Municipalities

  • Cătălin Berescu
Chapter
Part of the Neighborhoods, Communities, and Urban Marginality book series (NCUM)

Abstract

Drawing from the problem of typology creation in its current forms that can be found mainly in policy papers, Berescu offers a critical overview of some of the ways in which the places where impoverished Roma live are named, then labelled and categorized. The delimitation and counting of extreme poverty areas is a highly contentious issue in itself, but admitting that racial segregation exists is an even more difficult one. This is why official documents tend to circumvent the problem of slums and ghettos in Romania and, to a lesser extent, in Eastern Europe. By analysing the underlying methods and the language of reports and strategies we can comprehend the ways in which new ghettos are formed and concealed, and how they will be governed.

References

  1. Berescu, Cătălin, and Maria Celac. 2006. Housing and Extreme Poverty. Bucharest: Ion Mincu Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berescu, Cătălin, Maria Celac, Florin Botonogu, and A. Bălteanu. 2008. Metodologie de îmbunătățire a calității locuirii în zone afectate de sărăcie și excluziune socială. Bucharest: Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Botonogu, Florin, et al. 2012. Comunități ascunse: Ferentari [Hidden Communities. Ferentari]. Bucharest: Expert Publishing House.Google Scholar
  4. Catană, A., C. Fălan, and V. Ștefănescu. 2012. Impactul fondurilor Structural asupra comunităților sărace. București: RCR Editorial.Google Scholar
  5. Delepine, Samuel. 2007. Quartiers Tsiganes. L’habitat et le logement des Rroms de Roumanie en question. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  6. Horváth, István, ed. 2017. Raport de cercetare SocioRoMap. O cartografiere a comunităților de romi. Cluj-Napoca: Institutul pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităților Naționale.Google Scholar
  7. Kolev, Deyan, M. Metodieva, S. Panayotov, G. Bogdanov, and T. Krumova. 2010. Annual Report. In Roma Integration in Bulgaria 2007–2008. Plovdiv: ACTAPTA.Google Scholar
  8. Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and Elderly, State Secretariat for Social Inclusion. 2015. National Strategy on Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction 2014–2020. Bucharest: The Romanian Government.Google Scholar
  9. Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration. 2016. National Strategy for Housing. Bucharest: The Romanian Government. http://www.mmediu.ro/app/webroot/uploads/files/2017-01-13_Strategia_Nationala_a_Locuirii_2016-2030.pdf, accessed 01.02.2018.
  10. Romanian Government. 2002. Planul Naţional Anti-Sărăcie și Promovarea Incluziunii Sociale (National Anti-Poverty and Social Inclusion Plan). Retrieved from http://gov.ro/ro/obiective/strategii-politici-programe/planul-national-anti-saracie-i-promovare-a-incluziunii-sociale&page=2
  11. Romanian Government. 2014. Strategia Guvernului României de incluziunea a cetățenilor români aparținînd minorității rome 2014–2020 (The National Strategy for the Inclusion of the Roma 2014–2020). Bucharest: The Romanian Government.Google Scholar
  12. Roma National Strategy Secretariat. 2007. Challenges of the Roma Decade. Belgrade: Agency for Human and Minority Rights.Google Scholar
  13. Rughiniș, Cosima. 2004. Social Housing and Roma Residents in Romania. Budapest: Central European University.Google Scholar
  14. Stănculescu, Manuela S., and Ionica Berevoiescu. 2004. Sărac lipit, caut altă viață. Bucharest: Nemira.Google Scholar
  15. Stambuk, M. 2005. How Do Croatian Roma Live? Zagreb: Ivo Pilar Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Swinkels, R., M.S. Stănculescu, S. Anton, B. Koo, T. Man, and C. Moldovan. 2015. Atlasul zonelor urbane marginalizate din România (The Atlas of Urban Marginalized Areas and of Local Human Development in Romania). Bucharest: Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration.Google Scholar
  17. Teșliuc, Emil, Vlad Grigoraș, and Manuela Stănculescu. 2016. The Atlas of Rural Marginalized Areas and of Local Human Development in Romania. Bucharest: World Bank and the Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection, and the Elderly.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wacquant, Loic. 1997. Three Pernicious Premises in the Study of the American Ghetto. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cătălin Berescu
    • 1
  1. 1.Romanian AcademyThe Research Institute for Quality of LifeBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations