Advertisement

Introduction: Racialized Labour of the Dispossessed as an Endemic Feature of Capitalism

  • Norbert Petrovici
  • Cristina Raţ
  • Anca Simionca
  • Enikő Vincze
Chapter
Part of the Neighborhoods, Communities, and Urban Marginality book series (NCUM)

Abstract

The book is based on an ethnographic journey through five cities from various regions of Romania and their deprived areas recorded in local narratives as no-go places of “Țigănie.” It builds its theoretical perspective at the intersection of theories of unequal development and dependency, de-proletarization debates, postcolonial and decolonial studies, global anthropologies of labour, theories of postsocialism, and Romani studies. The authors regard ghettoized areas not only as systemic by-products but also as places shaped by neoliberal state policies that concentrate specific forms of precarious labour and thereby fuel capital accumulation. The book is divided into two larger parts: the first part unfolds the creation of racialized labour and spaces of marginality, and the second investigates how their invisibility is produced.

References

  1. Akram-Lodhi, Haroon, and Cristobal Kay, eds. 2012. Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Agrarian Transformation and Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Anthias, Floya. 2001. The Concept of ‘Social Divisions’ and Theorizing Social Stratification: Looking at Ethnicity and Class. Sociology 35 (4): 835–854.Google Scholar
  3. Ban, Cornel. 2016. Ruling Ideas. How Global Neoliberalism Goes Local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blasco, Paloma Gay. 1999. Gypsies in Madrid. Sex, Gender and the Performance of Identity. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  5. Boatcă, Manuela. 2003. From Neoevolutionism to World Systems Analysis: The Romanian Theory of “Forms Without Substance” in Light of Modern Debates on Social Change. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2007. The Eastern Margins of Empire: Coloniality in 19th Century Romania. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bockman, J. 2011. Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodnar, Judit. 2007. Becoming Bourgeois: (Postsocialist) Utopias of Isolation and Civilization. In Evil Paradises: Dreamworlds of Neoliberalism, ed. Mike Davis and Daniel Monk, 140–151. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bohle, Dorothee, and Bela Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Bloomington: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bonacich, Edna. 1972. A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market. American Sociological Review 37 (5): 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Böröcz, József, and Melinda, Kovács, eds. 2001. Empire’s New Clothes: Unveiling EU-Enlargement. EBook, a Central Europe Review.Google Scholar
  12. Botonogu, Florin, ed. 2011. Comunități ascunse. Ferentari [Hidden Communities. Ferentari]. Bucharest: Expert.Google Scholar
  13. Brass, Tom. 1999. Towards a Comparative Political Economy of Unfree Labour: Case Studies and Debates. London/Portland: Frank Cass Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2011. Labour Regime Change in the Twenty-First Century: Unfreedom, Capitalism and Primitive Accumulation. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2014. Debating Capitalist Dynamics and Unfree Labour: A Missing Link? Journal of Development Studies 50 (4): 570–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brenner, Robert. 1989. Economic Backwardness in Eastern Europe in Light of Developments in the West. In The Origins of Backwardness in Eastern Europe, ed. Daniel Chirot, 15–52. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Buden, Boris. 2010. Children of Postcommunism. Radical Philosophy 159: 18–25.Google Scholar
  18. Burawoy, Michael. 2009. The Extended Case Method. Berkeley: University of California. Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cao, Yang, and Victor G. Nee. 2000. Comment: Controversies and Evidence in the Market Transition Debate. American Journal of Sociology 105 (4): 1175–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carrier, James G., and Don Kalb. 2015. Anthropologies of Class: Power, Practice, and Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chelcea, Liviu. 2006. Marginal Groups in Central Places: Gentrification, Property Rights and Post-socialist Primitive Accumulation (Bucharest, Romania). In Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres: The Case of Central Europe, ed. György Enyedi and Zoltán Kovács, 107–126. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  22. Chertkovskaya, E., P. Watt, S. Tramer, S. Spoelstra, K. Berglund, V. Vesterberg, and H. Elraz. 2013. Giving Notice to Employability. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 13 (4): 701–716.Google Scholar
  23. Chirot, Daniel. 1976. Social Change in a Peripheral Society: The Creation of a Balkan Colony. New York/London: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chirot, Daniel, and A. Reid, eds. 1997. Essential Outsiders: Chinese and Jews in the Modern Transformation of Southeast Asia and Central Europe. Washington, DC: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  25. Collier, S.J. 2011. Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Costinescu, I.M. 2014. Path Dependency, World Systems Analysis, or Alternative Modernity? Research Notes on Interwar Romania and the Bucharest Sociological School. Romanian Sociology 12 (1-2): 119–132.Google Scholar
  27. Cucu, Alina-Sandra. 2014. Producing Knowledge in Productive Spaces: Ethnography and Planning in Early Socialist Romania. Economy and Society 43 (2): 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dean, Hartley. 2003. The Third Way and Social Welfare: The Myth of Post-Emotionalism. Social Policy and Administration 37 (7): 695–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dean, Hartley, and Peter Taylor-Gooby. 1992. Welfare Dependency: The Explosion of a Myth. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  30. Dobrogeanu-Gherea, Constantin. 2010 [1910]. Neo-serfdom. In Modernism: The Creation of Nation States, ed. A. Ersoy, Vol. 3, 419–425. Budapest/New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dunn, Elizabeth. 2004. Privatizing Poland: Baby Food, Big Business, and the Remaking of Labor. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three World of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Evans, Anthony J., and Dragos Aligica. 2009. The Neoliberal Revolution in Eastern Europe: Economic Ideas in the Transition from Communism. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Eyal, Gil, Iván Szelényi, and Eleanor Townsley. 1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists: Class Formation and Elite Struggles in Post-Communist Central Europe. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2001. The Utopia of Postsocialist Theory and the Ironic View of History in Neoclassical Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 106 (4): 1121–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Faje, Florin. 2011. Football Fandom in Cluj: Class, Ethno-Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism. In Headlines of Nation, Subtexts of Class: Working Class Populism and the Return of the Repressed in Neoliberal Europe, ed. Don Kalb and Gabor Halmai, 78–92. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  37. Florida, R.L. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Fosztó, László, ed. 2009. Colecție de studii despre romii din România [Collection of Studies About the Romanian Roma]. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ISPMN and Kriterion.Google Scholar
  39. Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Gille, Zsuzsa. 2007. From the Cult of Waste to the Trash Heap of History: The Politics of Waste in Socialist and Postsocialist Hungary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2010. Actor Networks, Modes of Production, and Waste Regimes: Reassembling the Macro-Social. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (5): 1049–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Guga, Ștefan. 2015. Sociologia istorica a lui Henri H. Stahl. Cluj-Napoca: Tact.Google Scholar
  43. Guy, Will, ed. 2001. Between Past and Future. The Roma of Central and Eastern Europe. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  44. Haney, Lynne. 2002. Inventing the Needy: Gender and Politics of Welfare in Hungary. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2011. The Enigma of Capital: And The Crises of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  47. Hamilton, Ian, Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, and Natasha Pichler-Milanovic, eds. 2006. Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards Globalization. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hayes, Michael, and Acton Thomas, eds. 2006. Counter-hegemony and the Postcolonial “Other”. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  49. Heumos, Peter. 2010. Workers Under Communist Rule: Research in the Former Socialist Countries of Eastern-Central and South-Eastern Europe and in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Review of Social History 55: 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hirt, Sonia, and Atanas Kovachev. 2006. The Changing Spatial Structure of Post-socialist Sofia. In The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Eastern Europe, ed. Sasha Tsenkova, 113–130. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Horváth, Sándor. 2005. Everyday Life in the First Hungarian Socialist City. International Labor and Working-Class History 68: 24–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Janos, A.C. 2000. East Central Europe in the Modern World: The Politics of the Borderlands from Pre-to Postcommunism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Jessop, Bob. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kalb, Don. 1998. Expanding Class: Power and Everyday Politics in Industrial Communities, The Netherlands 1850–1950. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2015. Introduction: Class and the New Anthropological Holism. In Anthropologies of Class: Power, Practice, and Inequality, ed. James G. Carrier and Don Kalb, 1–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kasmir, Sharryn, and August Carbonella. 2014. Blood and Fire: Toward a Global Anthropology of Labor. London/New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  57. Kertesi, Gábor, and Gábor Kézdi. 1997. Cigány etnikai gettók. Az 1990. évi népszámlálás számlálókörzeti adatai alapján készült elemzés [Tsigane Ethnic Ghettos. An Analysis Based on the 1990 Hungarian Population Census]. Budapest: TARKI.Google Scholar
  58. Kideckel, David. 2008. Getting by in Postsocialist Romania. Labor, the Body, and Working-Class Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kochanowicz, J. 1989. The Polish Economy and the Evolution of Dependency. In The Origins of Backwardness in Eastern Europe, ed. Daniel Chirot, 92–130. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Krippner, G.R. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Ladányi, János és Iván Szelényi. 2001a. A kirekesztettség változó formái [The Changing Forms of Exclusion]. Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 2001b. The Social Construction of Roma Ethnicity in Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary During Market Transition. Review of Sociology 7 (2): 79–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Liégeois, Jean-Pierre. 1986. Gypsies: An Illustrated History. London: Al Saqi Books.Google Scholar
  64. Lister, Ruth. 2004. Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  65. MacLeod, G. 2002. From Urban Entrepreneurialism to a ‘Revanchist City’? On the Spatial Injustices of Glasgow’s Renaissance. Antipode 34 (3): 602–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mateescu, Oana. 2012. Losing the Phenomenon: Time and Indeterminacy in the Practice of Anthrohistory. In Anthrohistory: Unsettling Knowledge, Questioning Discipline, ed. C. Bhimull, D.W. Cohen, F. Coronil, E.L. Murphy, M. Patterson, and J. Skurski. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  67. Matras, Yaron. 2002. Romani. A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mendieta, E. 2003. Latin American Philosophy: Currents, Issues, Debates. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Mirga, Andrej, and Nicolae Gheorghe. 1997. The Roma in the Twenty-First Century. A Policy Paper. Princeton: Project on Ethnic Relations.Google Scholar
  70. Moraña, M., E.D. Dussel, and C.A. Jáuregui. 2008. Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Năstasă, Lucian, and Diana Varga. 2001. Mărturii documentare. Țiganii din România 1919–1944. [Testimonials in documents. The Tsiganes in Romania 1919–1944]. Cluj-Napoca: Centrul pentru Resurse pentru Diversitate Etnoculturală.Google Scholar
  72. Okely, Judith. 1983. The Traveller-Gypsies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. ———. 1996. Own or Other Culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Ost, David. 2005. Defeat of Solidarity. Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Ourednicek, Martin, and Jana Temelova. 2009. Twenty Years After Socialism: Transformation of Prague’s Inner Structure. Studia UBB Sociologia 53 (2): 9–30.Google Scholar
  76. Patnaik, U., and M. Dingawaney, eds. 1985. Chains of Servitude: Bondage and Slavery in India. Madras: Sangam.Google Scholar
  77. Petrovici, Norbert. 2013. Neoliberal Proletarization Along the Urban-Rural Divide in Postsocialist Romania. Studia Sociologia 58 (2): 23–54.Google Scholar
  78. Petrovici, Norbert, and Anca Simionca. 2011. Productive Informality and Economic Ties in Emerging Economies: The Case of Cluj Business Networks. In Transformation and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe & Russia, ed. T. Bhambry and C. Griffin, 134–144. London: University College London.Google Scholar
  79. Pierson, Paul. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pittaway, Mark. 2005. Introduction: Workers and Socialist States in Postwar Central and Eastern Europe. International Labor and Working-Class History 68 (Fall): 1–8.Google Scholar
  81. Poenaru, Florin. 2015. Power at Play. Soccer Stadiums and Popular Culture in 1980s Romania. In Socialist Escapes: Breaking Away from Ideology and Everyday Routine in Eastern Europe, 1945–1989, ed. Cathleen M. Giustino, Catherine J. Plum, and Alexander Vari, 232–251. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  82. Pulay, Gergő. 2011. The Civilized, the Vagabond, the Player and the Fool. Notes on Fieldwork in a Bucharest Neighbourhood. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia 56 (1): 117–134.Google Scholar
  83. ———. 2015. ‘I’m Good but Also Mad’: The Street Economy in a Poor Neighbourhood of Bucharest. In Gypsy Economy. Romani Livelihoods and Notions of Worth in the 21st Century, ed. M. Brazzabeni, M. Ivone Cunha, and M. Fotta. Oxford: Berghan Books.Google Scholar
  84. Quijano, A. 2000. Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology 15 (2): 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Riabchuk, Anastasia. 2009. The Implications of Adaptation Discourse for Post-communist Working Classes. Debatte 17 (1): 55–64.Google Scholar
  86. Ruopilla, Sampo, and Anneli Kährik. 2003. Socio-economic Residential Differentiation in Post-socialist Tallinn. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 18: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Samara, T.R. 2010. Order and Security in the City: Producing Race and Policing Neoliberal Spaces in South Africa. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33 (4): 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Samson, Melanie. 2010. Producing Privatization: Re-articulating Race, Gender, Class and Space. Antipode 42 (2): 404–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. ———. 2015. Accumulation by Dispossession and the Informal Economy – Struggles Over Knowledge, Being and Waste at a Soweto Garbage Dump. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (5): 813–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sandu, Dumitru. 2005. Comunitățile de romi din România. O hartă a sărăciei comunitare prin sondajul PROROMI. [Roma Communities in Romania. A Community-Poverty Map Based on the PROROMI Survey]. Bucharest: The World Bank. http://www.anr.gov.ro/docs/statistici/PROROMI__Comunitatile_de_Romi_din_Romania_187.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.
  91. Sanyal, Kalyan, and Rajesh Bhattacharyya. 2009. Beyond the Factory: Globalisation, Informalisation of Production and the New Locations of Labour. Economic and Political Weekly 44 (22): 35–44.Google Scholar
  92. Schwartz, Herman. 2006. Round Up the Usual Suspects! Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Welfare State Change. In The New Politics of Welfare, ed. Christopher Pierson, 17–45. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  93. Simionca, Anca. 2012. Neoliberal Managerialism, Anti-communist Dogma and the Critical Employee in Contemporary Romania. Studia UBB Sociologia 57 (1): 125–149.Google Scholar
  94. Simionca, Anca, and Sorin Gog. 2016. Sociological and Anthropological Perspectives on Religion and Economy: Emerging Spiritualities and the Future of Work. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia 61 (2): 5–9.Google Scholar
  95. Slater, Tom. 2004. North American Gentrification? Revanchist and Emancipatory Perspectives Explored. Environment and Planning 36 (7): 1191–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. ———. 2015. Planetary Rent Gaps. Antipode, Early Online View. 22 September.Google Scholar
  97. Smith, Neil. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. ———. 1998. Giuliani Time: The Revanchist 1990s. Social Text 57 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. ———. 2002. New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy. Antipode 34 (3): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Smith, Adrian, Alison Stenning, Alena Rochovská, and Dariusz Światek. 2009. The Emergence of a Working Poor: Labour Markets, Neoliberalisation and Diverse Economies in Post-socialist Cities. Antipode 40 (2): 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stahl, H. Henry. 1980. Traditional Romanian Village Communities: The Transition From the Communal to the Capitalist Mode of Production in the Danube Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar
  102. Stănculescu, Manuela S., and Ionica Berevoiescu. 2004. Sărac lipit, caut altă viață [Poorest of the Poor, Searching for a New Life]. Bucharest: Nemira.Google Scholar
  103. Standing, Guy. 2007. Labour Recommodification in the Global Transformation. In Reading Karl Polanyi for the 21st Century, ed. Ayshe Bugra and Kan Agatan, 67–95. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. ———. 2011. The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  105. Stanilov, Kiril, ed. 2007. The Post-socialist City. Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Heildelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  106. Stenning, Alison, and Kathrin Hörschelmann. 2008. History, Geography and Difference in the Post-socialist World: Or, Do We Still Need Post-socialism? Antipode 40 (2): 312–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Stewart, Michael. 1997. The Time of the Gypsies. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  108. ———. 2002. Deprivation, the Roma and the ‘Underclass’. In Postsocialism. Ideals, Ideologies, and Practices in Euroasia, ed. Chriss M. Hann, 133–157. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. ———. 2012. The Gypsy ‘Menace’. Populism and the New Anti-Gypsy Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Swanson, Kate. 2007. Revanchist Urbanism Heads South: The Regulation of Indigenous Beggars and Street Vendors in Ecuador. Antipode 39 (4): 708–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Swinkels, Rob, Manuela S. Stănculescu, Simona Anton, Bryan Koo, Titus Man, and Ciprian Moldovan. 2015. Atlasul zonelor urbane marginalizate [The Atlas of Marginalized Urban Areas]. București: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  112. Szalai, Júlia, and Violetta Zentai, eds. 2014. Faces and Causes of Roma Marginalization in Local Contexts: Hungary, Romania, Serbia. Budapest: Central European University, CPS Books.Google Scholar
  113. Szelényi, Iván, and Eric Kostello. 1996. The Market Transition Debate: Towards a Synthesis? American Journal of Sociology 101 (4): 1082–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Tlostanova, Madina, and Walter Mignolo. 2012. Learning to Unlearn: Decolonial Reflections from Eurasia and the Americas. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Toma, Stefania. 2009. “Ţiganul ‘meu’ şi încrederea – relaţii economice informale într-o comunitate de romi din România” [‘My’ Tsigane and Trust – Informal Economic Relations in a Roma Community from Romania]. In Incluziune şi excluziune. Studii de caz asupra comunităţilor de romi din România, ed. Tamás Kiss, László Fosztó, and Gábor Fleck, 197–223. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ISPMN.Google Scholar
  116. Tremlett, Annabell. 2009. Claims of ‘Knowing’ in Ethnography: Realising Anti-essentialism Through a Critical Reflection on Language Acquisition in Fieldwork. The Graduate Journal of Social Science 6 (3): 63–85.Google Scholar
  117. Tsenkova, Sasha, and Zorica Nedovic-Budic, eds. 2006. The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe. Space, Institutions and Policy. Heildelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  118. Uitermark, Justus, and Jan Willem Duyvendak. 2008. Civilising the City: Populism and Revanchist Urbanism in Rotterdam. Urban Studies 45 (7): 1485–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Vincze, Enikő. 2014. The Racialization of Roma in the ‘New’ Europe and the Political Potential of Romani Women. European Journal of Women’s Studies 21 (4): 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. ———. 2015a. Adverse Incorporation of the Roma and the Formation of Capitalism in Romania. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics 1 (4): 14–38.Google Scholar
  121. ———. 2015b. Precarization of Working Class Roma Through Spatial Deprivation, Labor Destitution and Racialization. Review of Sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association 25 (4): 58–85.Google Scholar
  122. Wacquant, Loic. 2000. Logics of Urban Polarization: The View from Below. In Renewing Class Analysis, ed. Rosemary Crompton, Fiona Devine, Mike Savage, and John Scott, 107–119. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  123. ———. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  124. ———. 2012a. A Janus-Faced Institution of Ethnoracial Closure: A Sociological Specification of the Ghetto. In The Ghetto. Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies, ed. Ray Hutchinson and Bruce D. Haynes, 1–32. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  125. ———. 2012b. Three Steps for a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism. Social Anthropology 20 (1): 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  127. ———. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Willems, Wim. 1997. In Search of the True Gypsy. From Enlightenment to Final Solution. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  129. Whitehead, Judy, and N. More. 2007. Revanchism in Mumbai? Political Economy of Rent Gaps and Urban Restructuring in a Global City. Economic and Political Weekly 42 (25): 2428–2434.Google Scholar
  130. Wolf, Eric R. 2001. Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norbert Petrovici
    • 1
  • Cristina Raţ
    • 1
  • Anca Simionca
    • 1
  • Enikő Vincze
    • 2
  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentBabeș-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania
  2. 2.Faculty of European StudiesBabeș-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations