The Production or Intermediation Approach?: It Matters

  • Martin BoďaEmail author
  • Zuzana Piklová
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


The study builds upon the philosophical discrepancy between the production and intermediation approach to interpretation of banking business, but it brings up the issue of comparability of results that arise from application of both approaches in practical efficiency measurement of banking institutions. Its goal is to assess comparability or congruence of efficiency scores yielded by these two competitive approaches in a framework of data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is undertaken empirically in a case study of Slovak commercial banks for a period of 11 years from 2005 until 2015. The study finds that the main point of departure between the approaches that rests in treatment of deposits is an insuperable obstacle to comparability of their results, and that it does matter whether deposits are placed upon the input or output side of banking production. It is therefore safer to reconcile both approaches in a two-stage manner and to avoid black-box descriptions of banking production.


  1. Ahn H, Le MH (2014) An insight into the specification of the input-output set for DEA-based bank efficiency measurement. Man Rev Quart 64(1):3–37Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee B (2012) Banking sector efficiency in new EU member states: a survey. Prikazi in Analize 18(3):1–38Google Scholar
  3. Benston G (1965) Branch banking and economies of scale. J Financ 20(2):312–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger AN, Mester LJ (1997) Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? J Bank Financ 21(7):895–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boďa M (2015) A slacks-based measure DEA methodology for identification of returns to scale in the Slovak banking sector. Acta Univ Agric Silvicul Mendel Brun 63(6):1847–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boďa M, Zimková E (2015) Efficiency in the Slovak banking industry: a comparison of three approaches. Prague Econ Pap 24(4):434–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook WD, Zhu J (2007) Classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 180(2):692–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook WD, Tone K, Zhu J (2014) Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model. Omega 44:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drake L, Hall MJB, Simper R (2009) Bank modelling methodologies: a comparative non-parametric analysis of efficiency in the Japanese banking sector. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 19(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duygun Fethi M, Pasiouras F (2010) Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: a survey. Eur J Oper Res 204(2):189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emrouznejad A, Yang GI (2017) A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio Econ Plan Sci 61:4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kazan H, Baydar M (2013) Performance measurement with data envelopment analysis in service industry: banking application. Bus Manag Dyn 3(5):37–50Google Scholar
  13. Kočišová K (2012) Aplikácia DEA modelov pri analýze technickej efektívnosti pobočiek komerčnej banky. Ekon Cas 60(2):169–186Google Scholar
  14. Kočišová K (2013) Technical efficiency of top 50 world banks. J Appl Econ Sci 8(3):311–322Google Scholar
  15. Liu JS, Lu LYY, Lu WM, Lin BJY (2013a) A survey of DEA applications. Omega 41(5):893–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu JS, Lu LYY, Lu WM, Lin BJY (2013b) Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: a citation based literature survey. Omega 41(1):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nitoi M (2009) Efficiency in the Romanian banking system: an application of data envelopment analysis. Rom J Econ 29(2):162–176Google Scholar
  18. Palečková I (2015) Banking efficiency in Visegrad countries: a dynamic data envelopment analysis. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendel Brun 63(6):2085–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Accessed 10 Jun 2016Google Scholar
  20. Saitech (2014) Data envelopment analysis SolverProTM version 12.0. Saitech, New Jersey. Accessed 10 Jun 2016Google Scholar
  21. Sealey CW, Lindley JT (1977) Inputs, outputs and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. J Financ 32(8):1251–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang C-C (2012) Service, investment, and risk management performance in commercial banks. Serv Ind J 32(12):2005–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zimková E (2014) Technical efficiency and super-efficiency of the banking sector in Slovakia. Proc Econ Financ 12:780–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Matej Bel University in Banská BystricaBanská BystricaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations