Advertisement

Spanish Local Government and the Austerity Plan: In the Eye of the Perfect Storm

  • Carmen NavarroEmail author
  • Esther Pano
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

In the context of the severe crisis that Europe has faced in recent years, the countries of Southern Europe have been hit hardest by policies of austerity. These policies have taken on different guises depending on each country’s specific problems and strategies. The Spanish case is illustrative of the targeting of local authorities by central government to ensure a reduction in public spending. Under the watchwords of “financial sustainability” and “rationalisation”, a wide range of actions were implemented. Some meant a loss of local autonomy, as municipal entities underwent restructuring and service provisions were reformed. However, several years after the reforms were adopted, a current evaluation shows that local governments resisted many of these top-down actions, exhibiting a high degree of institutional resilience. This chapter analyses the variety of measures adopted, taking a twofold perspective: on the one hand, it examines the specific characteristics of the Spanish government’s austerity agenda, while, on the other, it documents carefully the reaction of local government authorities.

Keywords

Local government Economic crisis Fiscal crisis Spanish politics Austerity policies 

References

  1. Alba, C., & Navarro, C. (2003). Twenty-five Years of Democratic Local Government in Spain. In N. Kersting & A. Vetter (Eds.), Reforming Local Government in Europe (pp. 197–220). Opladen: Leske and Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldersheim, H., & Wollmann, H. (2006). The Comparative Study of Local Government and Politics: Overview and Synthesis. Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Claudio, E., Oyarce, M., Jones, G., Stewart, J., Travers, T., Oyarce, C. M., & Wei, K. (2011, April). Redefining Local Government.Google Scholar
  4. Delgado, M., García, B., & Zubimendi, L. (2017). La evolución de la deuda pública en España en 2016. Madrid: Banco de España. https://www.bde.es/f/webbde/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/InformesBoletinesRevistas/NotasEconomicas/T2/fich/bene1702-nec6.pdf
  5. Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 1(3), 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hay, C. (2013). Treating the Symptom Not the Condition: Crisis Definition, Deficit Reduction and the Search for a New British Growth Model. British Journal of Politics and International Relation, 15(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2016). Measuring Local Autonomy in 39 Countries (1990–2014). Regional & Federal Studies, 26(3), 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lanzara, G. F. (1998). Self-Destructive Processes in Institution Building and Some Modest Countervailing Mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 33(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
  9. Lowndes, V., & McCaughie, K. (2013). Weathering the Perfect Storm? Austerity and Institutional Resilience in Local Government. Policy & Politics, 41(4), 533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Medir, L., Pano, E., Viñas, A., & Magre, J. (2017). Dealing with Austerity: A Case of Local Resilience in Southern Europe. Local Government Studies, 43(4), 621–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Navarro, C., & Velasco, F. (2016). ‘In Wealth and in Poverty?’ The Changing Role of Spanish Municipalities in Implementing Childcare Policies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Orr, K. (2009). Local Government and Structural Crisis: An Interpretive Approach. Policy & Politics, 37(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Overmans, T., & Noordegraaf, M. (2014). Managing Austerity: Rhetorical and Real Responses to Fiscal Stress in Local Government. Public Money & Management, 34(2), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peters, B. G. (2010). Paying for Government: The Budgetary Process. In The Politics of Bureaucracy (pp. 261–293). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Peters, B. G. (2011). Governance Responses to the Fiscal Crisis—Comparative Perspectives. Public Money & Management, 31(1), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raudla, R., Savi, R., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2013). Literature Review on Cutback Management. COCOPS—(COordinating for COhesion in the Public Sector of the Future).Google Scholar
  17. Rodríguez-Márquez, J., & Romera-Jiménez, O. (2014). Un estudio sobre gasto impropio en la Administración Local española. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. http://www.ief.es/documentos/recursos/publicaciones/documentos_trabajo/2014_03.pdf
  18. Shaw, K. (2012). The Rise of the Resilient Local Authority? Local Government Studies, 38(3), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zapico, E. (2012). El presupuesto por resultados ante la crisis fiscal: compatibilizando austeridad y crecimiento. Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 69, 53–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Sciences and International RelationsAutonomous University of MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations