Advertisement

Feminist Movements’ Acts of Citizenship: Experiences from Post-Socialist Slovenia

  • Mojca Pajnik
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

The Slovenian chapter by Mojca Pajnik perceives social movements, not just as individual actions of protest but also as an opportunity to create new ways of thinking and being in the world. It discusses feminist movements’ “acts of citizenship”, that is, alternatives to patriarchy, neoliberalism, and racism by way of analyzing articulations and operations of movements in the context of post-socialist Slovenia. Based on focus group discussions with various protagonists of feminist movements and on participant observation at events, the chapter discusses the pertinent issues for these movements, their ideas, as well as concrete actions and strategies of resistance. By way of contrasting and connecting contemporary and “older” civil society feminist actors, the chapter offers insights into their perceptions of democracy, meanings of anti-racial struggle, and tactics of civil disobedience as well as their operational strategies, that is, how they are connected and what tactics they use in struggle.

Keywords

Feminist movements Acts of citizenship Slovenia Gender equality Democracy Racism 

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1958/1996). Vita activa. Ljubljana: Krtina.Google Scholar
  2. Balibar, É. (1988). Is there a “neo-racism”? In É. Balibar & I. Wallerstein (Eds.), Race, nation, class: Ambiguous identities (pp. 17–28). Verso: London.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance: Against the myths of our time. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burcar, L. (2012). Tradicija in feminizem [Tradition and feminism]. Borec, 64, 233–236.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crossley, N. (2002). Making sense of social movements in a globalized world. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. della Porta, D. (2009). Consensus in movements. In D. della Porta (Ed.), Democracy in social movements (pp. 73–99). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. della Porta, D. (2015). Social movements in times of austerity: Bringing capitalism back into protest analysis. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diani, M., & Mische, A. (2015). Network approaches and social movements. In D. della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 306–325). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dobnikar, M. (2009). Gibanje proti nasilju nad ženskami med feminizmom in socialnim delom [Movement against violence against women between feminism and social work]. Dialogi, 45, 98–111.Google Scholar
  12. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (1963/1972). Theorie und Praxis: Sozialphilosophische Studien. Suhrkamp Verlag: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  14. Humer, Ž. (2007). Europeanization and the equal opportunities policy in Slovenia. In K. Fábián (Ed.), Globalization: Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 305–326). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Isin, E., & Nielsen, G. M. (Eds.). (2008). Acts of citizenship. London: Zed Book.Google Scholar
  16. Jalušič, V. (2002). Kako smo hodile v feministično gimnazijo [How we attended feminist gymnasium]. Ljubljana: * cf.Google Scholar
  17. Jogan, M. (2001). Žensko gibanje [Women’s movement]. Enciklopedija Slovenije, zv. 15(WI-Ž), 318–324. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.Google Scholar
  18. Mattoni, A., & Trere, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory, 24, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Negt, O., & Kluge, A. (1972/1993). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pajnik, M. (2007). Nomadska javnost [Nomadic public]. Javnost–The Public, 14, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pajnik, M., & Zavratnik, S. (2016). Uvodnik. Družbena gibanja in alternativna politika: Vstaje v Sloveniji 2012–2013 [Introduction. Social movements and alternative politics: Uprising in Slovenia]. Družboslovne razprave, XXXII(82), 7–11.Google Scholar
  23. Pajnik, M., Humer, Ž., & Šori, I. (2014). Social movements as populist “anti-bodies” in Slovenia. WS3 Rage project report. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Pitcher, B. (2012). Race and capitalism redux. Patterns and Prejudice, 46(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribać, M. (2016). Dinamika in duh vstajništva – Klasifikacija in nasprotja med protestnimi skupinami v Sloveniji [The dynamic and spirit of uprisings: Classification and differences of various protest groups in Slovenia]. Družboslovne razprave, XXXII(82), 33–49.Google Scholar
  26. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Touraine, A. (1987). Social movements: Participation and protest. Scandinavian Political Studies, 10, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Touraine, A. (2002). The importance of social movements. Social Movement Studies, 1, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  30. Zavratnik, S., & Šori, I. (2016). Od ‘Nesimo jih vun k zamolku ulice: Diskusija o kriminalizaciji uporov in premiku k družbi nadzora [From “Let’s throw them out” to silenced streets: A discussion on criminalization of the uprising and the shift towards a society of control]. Družboslovne razprave, XXXII(82), 13–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mojca Pajnik
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of Ljubljana, and the Peace InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations