Advertisement

On Replacement pp 241-250 | Cite as

Replacement, objet a and the dynamic of desire/fantasy in Rebecca

  • Odeya Kohen Raz
  • Sandra Meiri
Chapter

Abstract

The authors argue that the unattainability of the object on the screen that characterises the ontology of cinema, alongside narrative film’s unique techniques, makes it possible for spectators to let the camera inscribe them into a fantasmatic space compatible with an unconscious inscription in the primal scene fantasy, which they conflate with getting access to the Other’s desire. This transgression is enabled only within a careful economy of desire/fantasy, in which the character, as incorporated by an actor, constitutes a ‘filling’ of objet a, meant to cover over its physical absence (the screen’s lack). The analysis of Rebecca (a ‘bodiless-character film’) – an exception that proves the rule – shows how within this economy the role of fantasy in narrative film is the support of desire.

References

  1. Dolar, Mladen, 1992, ‘Hitchcock’s Objects’, in Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock), ed. Slavoj Žižek (New York: Verso), 31–46Google Scholar
  2. Freud, Sigmund, 1955 [1919], ‘“A Child is Being Beaten”: A Contribution to the Study of the Origin of Sexual Perversions’, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. and tr. James Strachey et al (London: Hogarth Press), vol. 6: 175–204Google Scholar
  3. Hitchcock, Alfred, dir., 1940, Rebecca Google Scholar
  4. Hitchcock, Alfred, dir., 1959, North by Northwest Google Scholar
  5. Hitchcock, Alfred, dir., 1960, Psycho Google Scholar
  6. Jonze, Spike, dir., 2013, Her Google Scholar
  7. Kubrick, Stanley, dir., 1968, 2001: A Space Odyssey Google Scholar
  8. Lacan, Jacques, 1992 [1959–1960], The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, vol 6, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, tr. Dennis Porter (New York: Norton)Google Scholar
  9. Lacan, Jacques, 1998 [1964], The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, vol 11, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, tr. Alan Sheridan (New York: Norton)Google Scholar
  10. Lacan, Jacques, 2006a [1958], ‘The Significance of the Phallus’, in Écrits, tr. Bruce Fink (New York: Norton), 575–584Google Scholar
  11. Lacan, Jacques, 2006b [1960], ‘The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious’, in Écrits, tr. Bruce Fink (New York: Norton), 671–702Google Scholar
  12. Laplanche, Jean, and Jean-Bertrand Pontalis, 1988 [1967], The Language of Psychoanalysis, tr. Donald Nicholson-Smith (London: Karnac)Google Scholar
  13. Losey, Joseph, dir., 1976, Monsieur Klein Google Scholar
  14. Meiri, Sandra, and Odeya Kohen Raz, 2017, ‘Mainstream Body-Character-Breach Films and Subjectivization’, in The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 98, 201–217Google Scholar
  15. Metz, Christian, 1982 [1977], The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, tr. Celia Britton, Annwyl Williams, Ben Brewster and Alfred Guzzetti (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press)Google Scholar
  16. Modleski, Tania, 1988, ‘Woman and the Labyrinth: Rebecca’, in The Women Who Knew Too Much: Hitchcock and Feminist Theory (New York: Routledge), 43–55Google Scholar
  17. Sobchack, Vivian, 1994, ‘Phenomenology and the Film Experience’, in Viewing Positions: Ways of Seeing Film, ed. Linda Williams (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press), 36–58.Google Scholar
  18. Žižek, Slavoj, 1992, ‘Alfred Hitchcock, or, the Form and its Historical Mediation’, in Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock), ed. Slavoj Žižek (New York: Verso), 1–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Odeya Kohen Raz
    • 1
  • Sandra Meiri
    • 2
  1. 1.Sapir Academic CollegeAshkelonIsrael
  2. 2.Open University of IsraelRa’ananaIsrael

Personalised recommendations