The ethos of replaceability in European human rights law
This chapter examines the idea of ‘the individual’ that underpins European human rights law. It argues that this idea is comprised of two doctrines: presence and presentation. Presence is about the specificity of the individual, cast in terms of the unique sense of place and identity of an individual. Presentation is about the replaceability of this individual, and it is based on a representation of the individual through the terms of an alienable role or status. While these doctrines belong to the same idea of ‘the individual’, they are at odds with one another, to the point that their mediation instigates a crisis in the individual, whereupon it is revealed that the representation of ‘the individual’ is, in fact, a representation of replacement.
- Gross, Elizabeth, 1990, ‘The Body of Signification’, in Abjection, Melancholia and Love: The Work of Julia Kristeva, eds. John Fletcher and Andrew Benjamin (London: Routledge)Google Scholar
- Kristeva, Julia, 1982 , Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, tr. Leon S. Roudiez (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
- Levinas, Emmanuel, 1969 , Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, tr. Alphonso Lingis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press)Google Scholar
- Mauss, Marcel, 1938, ‘Une Catégorie de l’esprit humain: La notion de personne, celle de “moi”’, in The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 68 (Jul–Dec), 263–281Google Scholar
- Scarry, Elaine, 1985, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
- Simpson, A. W. Brian, 2001, Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar