Barriers to Switching in Retail Electricity Markets: A Regional Analysis of the Italian Market

  • Magda FontanaEmail author
  • Martina Iori
  • Consuelo Rubina Nava
Conference paper
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


The paper analyzes the determinants of switching barriers in a sample of Italian households. Inertia, while depressing consumer engagement and the associated benefits, also reduces competitive pressure in the energy retail free market. After the liberalization of the energy retail market in the European Union, the observed switching rates are relatively low: Identifying the causes of consumer inertia is therefore crucial to achieve the goals set by the European Union in the Three Energy Packages. We use a logistic regression model to discover the causes of consumer inertia as listed in the Aspect of Daily Life Survey (ISTAT 2014). Namely, we take into account: (i) loyalty, (ii) lack of information, (iii) difficulties in evaluating the economic benefits deriving from switching, (iv) perception of small savings from switching and (v) concerns for a worsening of the quality of service in case of switching. The main findings relate awareness—knowledge of the possibility to change the retailer—to the level of education and to the frequency of internet use. In addition, we find that households that are different in numerosity, geographical and urban location and in economic resources tend to attribute inertia to different causes. Among these, the most frequently reported are alleged difficulties in comparing offers and concerns about lower quality of service.


Consumers empowerment and action Switching rates and consumer inertia Informational problems Retail strategies Energy policy 


  1. AEEGSI. (2017). Monitoraggio Retail. Aggiornamento del rapporto per gli anni 2014 e 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Concettini, S., & Créti A. (2013). Liberalization of electricity retailing in Europe: Coming back or going forth? Cahier de Recherche, 2013–2029.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2015). Best practices on renewable energy self-consumption. SWD (2015) 141 final.Google Scholar
  4. Gamble, A., Juliusson, E. A., & Gärling, T. (2009). Consumer attitudes towards switching supplier in three deregulated markets. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(5), 814–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grubb, M. D. (2015). Failing to choose the best price: Theory, evidence, and policy. Review of Industrial Organization, 47(3), 303–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Littlechild, S. (2005). Smaller suppliers in the UK domestic electricity market: Experience, concerns and policy recommendations. London: OGFEM.Google Scholar
  7. Waterson, M. (2003). The role of consumer in competition and competition policy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(2), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magda Fontana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martina Iori
    • 2
  • Consuelo Rubina Nava
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Despina Big Data Lab and EST Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  2. 2.EST Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  3. 3.Department of Economics and Political ScienceUniversity of Valle dAostaAostaItaly

Personalised recommendations