From Registration to Emagination

  • Alberto Romele


While this book is primarily devoted to the topic of registration, recording, and keeping track in the digital age, this chapter must be seen as a coda, in which the author intends to lead the reader towards a series of reflections on imagination or, as he calls it, emagination. For him, emagination does not contradict registration. It can rather be seen as an emerging property of the latter, just as registration can be seen as an emerging property of information and communication.


  1. Bachimont, Bruno. 2010. Le sens de la technique. Le numérique et le calcul. Paris: Les belles lettres.Google Scholar
  2. Beaubois, Vincent. 2015. Un schématisme pratique de la raison. Appareil 18.
  3. Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Danto, Arthur. 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and Difference. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Desrosières, Alain. 2002. The Politics of Large Numbers. A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Domingos, Pedro. 2015. The Master Algorithm. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Estivals, Robert. 2003. Théorie générale de la schématisation 3. Théorie de la communication. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  10. Ferraris, Maurizio. 2012. Documentality. Why It is Necessary to Leave Traces. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Floridi, Luciano, and James Sanders. 2004. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14 (3): 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  13. Ginzburg, Carlo. 1989. Clues. Roots of an Evidential Paradigm. In Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, 96–125. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, Immanuel. 1987. Critique of Judgment. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Latour, Bruno. 2007. Beware, Your Imagination Leaves Digital Traces. Times Higher Literary Supplement, April 6, 2007.
  16. Lenk, Hans. 1995. Schemaspiel: über Schemainterpretation und Interpretationskonstrukte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  17. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  18. Maddalena, Giovanni. 2015. Philosophy of Gesture. Completing Pragmatists’ Incomplete Revolution. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Makkreel, Rudolf. 1990. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant. The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2017. Automatic Aesthetics. Artificial Intelligence and Image Culture, 2017. Accessed September 12, 2017.
  22. Mélice, Anne. 2009. Un concept lévi-straussien déconstruit: le “bricolage”. Les temps modernes 5 (265): 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Romele, Alberto. 2018. Imaginative Machines. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 22 (1): 98–125.Google Scholar
  24. Simondon, Gilbert. 1989. Du Mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2014. Imagination et invention (1965–1966). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Romele
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Université Catholique de LilleLilleFrance
  2. 2.Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations