• Alberto Romele
  • Enrico Terrone


This introduction accounts for three main elements characterizing digital media and the recent history of their interpretation and understanding. The authors label these three elements: (1) “interaction”; (2) “recording”; and (3) “autonomy.” First, digital media somehow subvert the traditional notion of mass media. In digital media, the masses do not passively receive information; rather, they contribute to its creation and diffusion. Second, digital media involve a complete overlapping between communication, on the one hand, and recording, registration and keeping track, on the other. For sure, information production and communication remain important aspects of digital media. And yet, for a few years now, recording, registration and keeping track have taken the upper hand. The third element characterizing digital media is that a crucial role is assigned to software, which is not only able to transmit and store information, but also to manipulate it. Digital media do not limit themselves to help our minds or to interconnect us with other human subjects. In digital media, recording often involves the autonomous manipulation, combination, and recombination of what is recorded.


  1. Adorno, Theodor W., and Max Horkheimer. 2007. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andrejevic, Mark, and Kelly Gates. 2014. Big Data Surveillance. Introduction. Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 185–196.Google Scholar
  3. Davies, David. 2003. Medium in Art. In the Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Domingos, Pedro. 2015. The Master Algorithm. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. What Computers Still Can’t Do. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gaut, Berys. 2010. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haugeland, John. 1985. Artificial Intelligence. The Very Idea. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Himanen, Pekka. 2001. The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of Information Age. London: Martin Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  10. Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld. From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kittler, Friedrich. 1999. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Latour, Bruno. 1994. On Technical Mediation. Common Knowledge 3 (2): 29–64.Google Scholar
  13. Lopes, Dominic. 2009. A Philosophy of Computer Art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  15. Marres, Noortje. 2017. Digital Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor. 2011. Delete. The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rogers, Richard. 2013. Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Romele, Alberto, and Marta Severo. 2016. The Economy of the Digital Gift. From Socialism to Sociality Online. Theory, Culture & Society 33 (5): 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2011. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Romele
    • 1
    • 2
  • Enrico Terrone
    • 3
  1. 1.Université Catholique de LilleLilleFrance
  2. 2.Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Università di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations