Advertisement

Incorporating Organizational Ambidexterity in the Public Sector Through Servant Leadership

  • Miguel Martinez de Castro Pinto Luz
  • Milton Sousa
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter aims to contribute toward a better understanding of servant leadership in a public administration context. We explore how servant leadership can contribute toward greater organizational ambidexterity, allowing public institutions to simultaneously achieve bureaucratic efficiency and increased innovation in response to an unprecedented changing environment. This coincides with Robert Greenleaf’s original appeal for servant responsibility in an ever-increasing bureaucratic society, such as to safeguard the institutions’ first and foremost obligation to serve, and ultimately their long-term viability.

Keywords

Servant leadership Public administration Organizational ambidexterity Bureaucratic efficiency Innovation 

References

  1. Aagaard, P. 2011. Organizational Ambidexterity: How to Be Both Innovative and Efficient in the Public Sector. Clips 5 (11): 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P. 2013. The Collaborative, Ambidextrous Enterprise. Universia Business Review 40: 34–51.Google Scholar
  3. Alexiev, A.S., J.J.P. Jansen, F.A.J. Van den Bosch, and H.W. Volberda. 2010. Top Management Team Advice Seeking and Exploratory Innovation: The Moderating Role of TMT Heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies 47 (7): 1343–1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00919.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asag-Gau, L., and D. Van Dierendonck. 2011. The Impact of Servant Leadership on Organisational Commitment Among the Highly Talented: The Role of Challenging Work Conditions and Psychological Empowerment. European Journal of International Management 5 (5): 463–483.Google Scholar
  5. Borgatti, S.P., and P.C. Foster. 2003. The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management 29 (6): 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, S.L., and K.M. Eisenhardt. 1997. The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Based Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryson, J.M., K.B. Boal, and H.G. Rainey. 2008. Strategic Orientation and Ambidextrous Public Organizations. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process: A Reflection on the Research Perspective of Raymond Miles and Charles Snow, no. December:1–24.Google Scholar
  8. Burgess, N., K. Strauss, G. Currie, and G. Wood. 2015. Organizational Ambidexterity and the Hybrid Middle Manager: The Case of Patient Safety in UK Hospitals. Human Resource Management 54: s87–s109.Google Scholar
  9. Cannaerts, N., J. Segers, and E. Henderickx. 2016. Ambidextrous Design and Public Organizations: A Comparative Case Study. International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (7): 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmeli, A., and M.Y. Halevi. 2009. How Top Management Team Behavioral Integration and Behavioral Complexity Enable Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Contextual Ambidexterity. Leadership Quarterly 20 (2). Elsevier Inc.): 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, J. 2001. Level 5 Leadership: The Triumph of Humility and Fierce Resolve. Harvard Business Review 79 (1): 66–76.Google Scholar
  13. Correia de Sousa, M.J., and D. van Dierendonck. 2014. Servant Leadership and Engagement in a Merge Process under High Uncertainty. Journal of Organizational Change Management 27 (6): 877–899. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2013-0133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennis, R.S., and M. Bocarnea. 2005. Development of the Servant Leadership Assessment Instrument. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26 (8): 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510633692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freedom House. 2017. Freedom in the World 2017 – Populists and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to Global Democracy, 28. https://doi.org/10.2307/20040588.
  17. Gibson, C.B., and J. Birkinshaw. 2004. The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Management 47 (2): 209–226.Google Scholar
  18. Greenleaf, R.K. 1977. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  19. Greenleaf, R. 2002. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hood, C. 1996. The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
  21. Jansen, J.J.P., D. Vera, and M. Crossan. 2009. Strategic Leadership for Exploration and Exploitation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism. Leadership Quarterly 20 (1):5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008. Elsevier Inc.
  22. Konczak, L.J., D.J. Stelly, and M.L. Trusty. 2000. Defining and Measuring Empowering Leader Behaviors: Development of an Upward Feedback Instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement 60 (2): 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Largacha-Martínez, C. 2011. What Is Your Calling? SEMCO’s Invitation to Participatory Management. In Humanistic Management in Practice, 215–230. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lavie, D., U. Stettner, and M.L. Tushman. 2010. Exploration and Exploitation within and across Organizations. Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 109–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003691287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. March, J. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational. Learning 2 (1): 71–87.Google Scholar
  26. Morris, J.A., C.M. Brotheridge, and J.C. Urbanski. 2005. Bringing Humility to Leadership: Antecedents and Consequences of Leader Humility. Human Relations 58 (10): 1323–1350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705059929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Reilly, C.A., and M.L. Tushman. 2008. Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Reilly, G.A., and M.L. Tushman. 2011. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action. California Management Review 53 (4): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Reilly, C., and M. Tushman. 2013. Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. The Academy of Management Perspectives 27 (4): 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palm, K., and J. Lilja. 2017. Key Enabling Factors for Organizational Ambidexterity in the Public Sector. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 9 (1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patterson, K. 2003. Servant Leadership: A Theoretical Model. Regent University.Google Scholar
  32. Pearce, C.L., and H.P. Sims. 2002. Vertical Versus Shared Leadership as Predictors of the Effectiveness of Change Management Teams: An Examination of Aversive, Directive, Transactional, Transformational, and Empowering Leader Behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 (2): 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson, C., and M.E.P. Seligman. 2004. In Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification, ed. American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Raisch, S., and J. Birkinshaw. 2008. Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management 34 (3): 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Russel, R. 2001. The Role of Values in Servant Leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 22 (2): 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, E., and T. Umans. 2015. Organizational Ambidexterity at the Local Government Level: The Effects of Managerial Focus. Public Management Review 17 (6). Routledge): 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.849292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, W.K., M.L. Tushman, W.K. Smith, and M.L. Tushman. 2005. Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams. Organization Science 16 (5): 522–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, W.K., A. Binns, and M.L. Tushman. 2010. Complex Business Models: Managing Strategic Paradoxes Simultaneously. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3). Elsevier Ltd.): 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner, N., J. Swart, and H. Maylor. 2013. Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (3): 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tushman, M.L., and C.A. O’Reilly. 1996. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review 38 (4): 8–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tushman, M., and E. Romanelli. 1985. Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation. Research in Organizational Behaviour 7: 171–222.Google Scholar
  42. Tushman, M.L., C. O’Reilly, and B. Harreld. 2013. Leading Strategic Renewal: Proactive Punctuated Change Through Innovation Streams and Disciplined Learning. Harvard Business School: 1–42.Google Scholar
  43. Van Dierendonck, D. 2011. Servant Leadership : A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Management 37 (4): 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Dierendonck, D., and I. Nuijten. 2011. The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure. Journal of Business and Psychology 26 (3): 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber, M. 1946. Bureaucracy, ed. H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills. New York. https://archive.org/stream/frommaxweberessa00webe/frommaxweberessa00webe_djvu.txt.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Martinez de Castro Pinto Luz
    • 1
  • Milton Sousa
    • 2
  1. 1.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Nova School of Business and EconomicsLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations