Advertisement

Simulating Platelet Transport in Type-B Aortic Dissection

  • Louis P. Parker
  • Lachlan J. Kelsey
  • James Mallal
  • Roland Hustinx
  • Natzi Sakalihasan
  • Paul E. Norman
  • Barry DoyleEmail author
Conference paper
  • 286 Downloads

Abstract

Aortic dissection is where the medial layer of the arterial wall is separated by a tear leading to intramural bleeding. The blood forms an alternate channel of flow known as the false lumen. Thrombosis of the false lumen (FL) is common in cases of dissection as flow conditions are typically more stagnant than in the true lumen (TL). Central to the process of thrombosis is the activation and aggregation of platelets in the blood. Therefore, the aim of this work is to simulate the transport of platelets in a case of Type-B aortic dissection in a clinically-relevant timeframe.

We investigated a 38-year-old female with Type-B aortic dissection. After reconstructing the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans into three dimensions, we created a computational mesh of polyhedral and prism elements. We used realistic boundary conditions at the inlet and at the outlets via 3-element Windkessel models. A one-way Lagrangian method was used to model the trajectories of platelets and particles were injected for 11 s over 16 cardiac cycles. The total number of injected particles was 1.5M. We ran our simulations on 512 cores of the MAGNUS supercomputer at the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre.

We observed elevated residence times of these particles in regions of both stagnant (low TAWSS) and recirculating flow (high OSI), emphasising the need to consider both TAWSS and OSI in thrombus susceptibility predictions for dissection. Tear geometry was seen to have a dominating effect on TL haemodynamics, with platelets colliding and adhering to the wall primarily around the proximal entry tears and supra-aortic branching vessels.

The complex flow patterns support the need for computational modelling to reveal flow conditions and prognosis for Type-B aortic dissection patients. Furthermore, high-performance computing enables computationally expensive patient-specific simulations to be carried out within a clinical timescale.

Keywords

Computational fluid dynamics Particle residence time Wall shear stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (grants APP106986 and APP1083572) and the William and Marlene Schrader Trust. This work was supported by resources provided by the Pawsey Supercomputing Centre with funding from the Australian Government and the Government of Western Australia. The patient was imaged for the Liège Study on Dissected Aorta (LIDIA) partially funded by ‘Fonds pour la chirurgie cardiaque, Belgium’ and unrestricted research grant from Medtronic.

References

  1. 1.
    Erbel R et al (2014) ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 35(41):2873–2926.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khandheria BK (1993) Aortic dissection. The last frontier. Circulation 87(5):1765–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pretre R, Von Segesser LK (1997) Aortic dissection. Lancet 349(9063):1461–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)09372-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roberts CS, Roberts WC (1991) Aortic dissection with the entrance tear in the descending thoracic aorta. Analysis of 40 necropsy patients. Ann Surg 213(4):356–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hagan PG et al (2000) The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283(7):897–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bickerstaff LK et al (1982) Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. Surgery 92(6):1103–1108Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Midulla M et al (2013) Aortic dissection and malperfusion syndrome: a when, what and how-to guide. Radiol Med 118(1):74–88.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-012-0815-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai TT et al (2006) Long-term survival in patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation 114(1 Suppl):I350–I356.  https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.000497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai TT et al (2008) Tear size and location impacts false lumen pressure in an ex vivo model of chronic type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 47(4):844–851.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erbel R et al (1993) Effect of medical and surgical therapy on aortic dissection evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for prognosis and therapy. The European Cooperative Study Group on Echocardiography. Circulation 87(5):1604–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernard Y et al (2001) False lumen patency as a predictor of late outcome in aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol 87(12):1378–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsai TT et al (2007) Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection. N Engl J Med 357(4):349–359.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa063232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Menichini C, Xu XY (2016) Mathematical modeling of thrombus formation in idealized models of aortic dissection: initial findings and potential applications. J Math Biol 73(5):1205–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-0986-4 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S (1999) Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282(21):2035–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goel MS, Diamond SL (2002) Adhesion of normal erythrocytes at depressed venous shear rates to activated neutrophils, activated platelets, and fibrin polymerized from plasma. Blood 100(10):3797–3803.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-03-0712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Courtois A et al (2013) 18F-FDG uptake assessed by PET/CT in abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with cellular and molecular alterations prefacing wall deterioration and rupture. J Nucl Med 54(10):1740–1747.  https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.115873 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doyle BJ et al (2008) 3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: from CT scan to silicone model. J Biomech Eng 130(3):034501.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2907765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spiegel M et al (2011) Tetrahedral vs. polyhedral mesh size evaluation on flow velocity and wall shear stress for cerebral hemodynamic simulation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 14(1):9–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2010.518565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kelsey LJ et al (2017) A comparison of hemodynamic metrics and intraluminal thrombus burden in a common iliac artery aneurysm. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 33.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2821
  20. 20.
    Kelsey LJ et al (2016) The influence of downstream branching arteries on upstream haemodynamics. J Biomech 49(13):3090–3096.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Doyle B, Kavanagh E (2014) From detection to rupture: a serial computational fluid dynamics case study of a rapidly expanding, patient-specific, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. In: Computational biomechanics for medicine. Springer, New York, pp 53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boyd AJ et al (2016) Low wall shear stress predominates at sites of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. J Vasc Surg 63(6):1613–1619.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Les AS et al (2010) Quantification of hemodynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms during rest and exercise using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 38(4):1288–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9949-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Poelma C, Watton PN, Ventikos Y (2015) Transitional flow in aneurysms and the computation of haemodynamic parameters. J R Soc Interface 12(105):20141394.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.1394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wolters BJ et al (2005) A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Eng Phys 27(10):871–883.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laskey WK et al (1990) Estimation of total systemic arterial compliance in humans. J Appl Physiol 69(1):112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pui DYH, Romay-Novas F, Liu BYH (1987) Experimental study of particle deposition in bends of circular cross section. Aerosol Sci Technol 7(3):301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hardman D (2010) In: Hoskins P, Easson B, C. Medical Research (eds) Computational modelling of monocyte deposition in abdominal aortic aneurysms. The University of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    AlMomani T et al (2008) Micro-scale dynamic simulation of erythrocyte–platelet interaction in blood flow. Ann Biomed Eng 36(6):905–920.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9478-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Longest PW, Kleinstreuer C, Buchanan JR (2004) Efficient computation of micro-particle dynamics including wall effects. Comput Fluids 33(4):577–601.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2003.06.002 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Basciano C et al (2011) A relation between near-wall particle-hemodynamics and onset of thrombus formation in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 39(7):2010–2026.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0285-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Di Achille P et al (2014) A haemodynamic predictor of intraluminal thrombus formation in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 470(2172):20140163.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2014.0163 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis P. Parker
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lachlan J. Kelsey
    • 1
    • 2
  • James Mallal
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roland Hustinx
    • 3
  • Natzi Sakalihasan
    • 3
  • Paul E. Norman
    • 1
    • 4
  • Barry Doyle
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, and Centre for Medical ResearchThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  3. 3.Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery DepartmentUniversity Hospital LiègeLiègeBelgium
  4. 4.School of MedicineThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  5. 5.BHF Centre for Cardiovascular ScienceThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations