Advertisement

International Research Collaboration and Knowledge Production in Colombia: A Qualitative Network Analysis Approach

  • Clara I. Tascón
Chapter
Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)

Abstract

International Research Collaboration (IRC) is one of the main drivers of knowledge production worldwide. This chapter provides examples of IRC from two Colombian research networks tied respectively to one public and one private university. Based on a qualitative Social Network Analysis (SNA) approach within the field of comparative and international education, this study examines the configurations of these research networks and their embedded diaspora associations to reveal the relational dynamics of their interconnections, activities, and other factors that come together in the IRC process. This qualitative network approach allows for exploration of the more complex scenario of the knowledge flows, sharing, and production involved in IRC, which goes beyond the traditional counting of co-publications and provides a richer documentation of IRC experiences.

Keywords

International Research Collaboration Knowledge production Research networks Colombia 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2007). Peripheries and Centers: Research Universities in Developing Countries. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v19art13-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G. (2013). Advancing the National and Global Knowledge Economy: The Role of Research Universities in Developing Countries. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.773605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Public Culture, 2(2), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its Study): Past, Present, and Future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377. http://journals1.scholarsportal.info.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/pdf/01389130/v52i0003/365_roscisppaf.xml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On Network Theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review. Sprouts: Working Papers in Information Systems 10(3), 1–17. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Helena_Bukvova/publication/200629645_Studying_Research_Collaboration_A_Literature_Review/links/0fcfd50d30e026bcc8000000.pdf
  7. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Vol. 1). Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, M., & Cardoso, G. (Eds.). (2005). The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar
  9. Colombian Institute for the Development of Science and Technology – COLCIENCIAS. (2018). About Colciencias. Retrieved from: http://www.colciencias.gov.co
  10. de Wit, H. (2010, December). Internationalisation of Higher Education in Europe and Its Assessments, Trends and Issues. NVAO Nederlands-Vlaamse Accreditatieorganisatie. http://www.cinda.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/De-Wit-Internationalisation-of-Higher-Education-in-Europe.pdf
  11. de Wit, H., Jaramillo, I. C., Gacel-Ávila, J., & Knight, J. Eds. (2005). Higher Education in Latin America: The International Dimension. The World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTLACREGTOPEDUCATION/Resources/Higher_Ed_in_LAC_Intnal_Dimension.pdf
  12. Edwards, G. (2010). Mixed-Method Approaches to Social Network Analysis. National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/842/1/Social_Network_analysis_Edwards.pdf
  13. Frame, J. D., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International Research Collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277900900405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuhse, J., & Mützel, S. (2011). Tackling Connections, Structure, and Meaning in Networks: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Sociological Network Research. Quality & Quantity, 45, 1067–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9492-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harvey, D. (2006). Space as a Keyword. In N. Castree & Derek (Eds.), David Harvey a Critical Reader (pp. 270–293). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is Research Collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. http://journals1.scholarsportal.info.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/pdf/00487333/v26i0001/1_wirc.xmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization Remodeled: Definition, Approaches, and Rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knobel, M., Simões, T. P., & Cruz, C. H. d. B. (2013). International Collaborations Between Research Universities: Experiences and Best Practices. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.773793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landry, R., Traore, N., & Godin, B. (1996). An Econometric Analysis of the Effect of Collaboration on Academic Research Productivity. Higher Education, 32(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  23. Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and Self-Organization. Research Collaboration on the Individual Level. Research Policy, 29, 31–40. http://journals1.scholarsportal.info.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/pdf/00487333/v29i0001/31_pas.xmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer, J.-B. (2001). Networks Approach Versus Brain Drain: Lessons from the Diaspora. International Migration, 39(5), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer, J.-B., & Wattiaux, J. P. (2006). Diaspora Knowledge Networks: Vanishing Doubts and Increasing Evidence. International Journal of Multicultural Societies, 8(1): 4–24. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001490/149086e.pdf#149125
  26. Meyer, J.-B., Charum, J., Granés, J., & Chatelin, Y. M. (1995). Is It Opened or Closed? Colombian Science on the Move. Scientometrics, 34(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meyer, J.-B., Charum, J., Bernal, D., Gaillard, J., Granés, J., Leon, J., Montenegro, A., Morales, A., Murcia, C., Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Parrado, L. S., & Schlemmer, B. (1997). Turning Brain Drain into Brain Gain: The Colombian Experience of the Diaspora Option. Science, Technology & Society, 2(2), 286–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189700200205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morrison, P. S., Dobbie, G., & McDonald, F. J. (2003). Research Collaboration Among University Scientists. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000145149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Frigoletto, L., & Miquel, J.-F. (1992). International Scientific Collaboration in Latin America. Scientometrics, 24(3), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02051036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ninnes, P., & Mehta, S. (2004). Re-imagining Comparative Education: Postfoundational Ideas and Applications for Critical Times. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  31. Ordóñez-Matamoros, G. (2008). International Research Collaboration, Research Team Performance, and Scientific and Technological Capabilities in Colombia: A Bottom-Up Perspective. PhD diss., Georgia State University. http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/pmap_diss/18/
  32. Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Cozzens, S. E., & Garcia-Luque, M. (2010). International Co-authorship and Research Team Performance in Colombia. Review of Policy Research, 27(4), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00449.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinheiro, C. A. R. (2011). Social Network Analysis in Telecommunications. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Robertson, S. (2010). Spatializing the Sociology of Education: Stand-Points, Entry-Points, Vantage-Points. In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Sociology of Education (pp. 15–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, J. (2012). What Is Social Network Analysis? London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  36. Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  37. Shin, J. C., Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2013). Research Collaboration Across Higher Education Systems: Maturity, Language Use, and Regional Differences. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.774585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, D. (2001). Collaborative Research: Policy and the Management of Knowledge Creation in UK Universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 55(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2273.00179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, D., & Katz, J. S. 2000. University of Leeds, Higher Education Policy Unit, University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit. Collaborative Approaches to Research: Final Report. Leeds: University of Leeds, Higher Education Policy Unit. http://users.sussex.ac.uk/~sylvank/pubs/collc.pdf
  40. Soja, E. W. (1996). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  41. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific Collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stier, J. (2004). Taking a Critical Stance Towards Internationalization Ideologies in Higher Education: Idealism, Instrumentalism, and Educationalism. Globalization, Societies and Education, 21(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1476772042000177069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tascón, C. I. (2017). Knowledge Production in International Research Collaboration: A Comparative Study of Canadian and Colombian Research Networks. PhD diss., Western University, Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4711. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4711
  44. Tejada, G. (2012). Mobility, Knowledge and Cooperation: Scientific Diaspora as Agents of Development. Migration and Development, 10(18), 59–92.Google Scholar
  45. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization — UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). (2005, September). What do Bibliometric Indicators Tell Us about World Scientific Output? UIS Bulletin on Science and Technology Statistics, Issue No. 2. http://unescoscience.blogspot.ca/2005_12_01_archive.html
  46. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network Structure, Self-Organization, and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science. Research Policy, 34, 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wong, A., & Yoda, T. (2001, March). Science and Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity in Developing Countries. Report Prepared for the World Bank: Science and Technology Policy Institute. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1357.0.pdf
  48. Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). The Spatial Turn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Wasser, J. D., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the Interpretive Zone: Conceptualizing Collaborations in Qualitative Research Teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025005005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, H. D. (2011). Scientific and Scholarly Networks. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis (pp. 271–285). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  51. World Bank. (2016). Research and Development Expenditure (% of GDP). Data. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
  52. Zelnio, R. (2013). A Complexity Approach to Evaluating National Scientific Systems Through International Scientific Collaborations. PhD diss., George Mason University, Archival Repository Service. http://hdl.handle.net/1920/8272
  53. Zingerli, C. (2010). A Sociology of International Research Partnerships for Sustainable Development. European Journal of Development Research, 22(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2010.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clara I. Tascón
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations