Advertisement

Research Partnership Over Neocolonialism: Max Planck Society Policy in Latin America

  • Pedro Pineda
  • Bernhard Streitwieser
Chapter
Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)

Abstract

Theoretical approaches to North-South research partnerships have highlighted how they foster better capacity building and also come with embedded external cultural controls. An analysis of the German Max Planck Institutes’ work in Latin America illustrates how cooperation on the Northern side is promoted by well-defined programs, while on the Southern side is supported by governmental and university policies strengthening the academic environment and its international partnerships, particularly in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Colombia. However, while these collaborations give researchers from the global South greater access to a wider realm of international activity, the agendas within which they operate are still largely determined by Northern partners, which may exclude greater influence by Southern peers.

Keywords

North-South partnerships Research administration Research networks Institutional research Research collaboration 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (1998a). Comparative Higher Education: Knowledge, the University, and Development. Greenwich: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G. (1998b). The University as Center and Periphery. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), Comparative Higher Education: Knowledge, the University, and Development (pp. 19–36). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Andreae, M. O., Acevedo, O. C., Araùjo, A., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, C. G. G., Barbosa, H. M. J., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Chi, X., Cintra, B. B. L., da Silva, N. F., Dias, N. L., Dias-Júnior, C. Q., Ditas, F., Ditz, R., Godoi, A. F. L., Godoi, R. H. M., Heimann, M., Hoffmann, T., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Krüger, M. L., Lavric, J. V., Manzi, A. O., Lopes, A. P., Martins, D. L., Mikhailov, E. F., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Nelson, B. W., Nölscher, A. C., Santos Nogueira, D., Piedade, M. T. F., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Quesada, C. A., Rizzo, L. V., Ro, C. U., Ruckteschler, N., Sá, L. D. A., de Oliveira Sá, M., Sales, C. B., dos Santos, R. M. N., Saturno, J., Schöngart, J., Sörgel, M., de Souza, C. M., de Souza, R. A. F., Su, H., Targhetta, N., Tóta, J., Trebs, I., Trumbore, S., van Eijck, A., Walter, D., Wang, Z., Weber, B., Williams, J., Winderlich, J., Wittmann, F., Wolff, S., & Yáñez-Serrano, A. M. (2015). The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): Overview of Pilot Measurements on Ecosystem Ecology, Meteorology, Trace Gases, and Aerosols. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(18), 10723–10776. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10723-2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, A. M., Crossley, M. W., & Fon, P. T. (2014). North-south Research Partnerships in Higher Education: Perspectives from South and North. In B. Streitwieser (Ed.), Internationalization of Higher Education and Global Mobility. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  5. Baud, I. (2002). North-South Partnerships in Development Research: An Institutional Approach. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 1(3), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.1.3.153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-David, J. (1960). Scientific Productivity and Academic Organization in Nineteenth-Century Medicine. American Sociological Review, 25(6), 828–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-David, J. (1977). Centers of Learning: Britain, France, Germany, United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-David, J. (1991). Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science. Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bernasconi, A. (2005). University Entrepreneurship in a Developing Country: The Case of the P. Universidad Católica de Chile, 1985–2000. Higher Education, 50(2), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernasconi, A. (2007). Are There Research Universities in Chile? In P. G. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.), Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America (pp. 234–259). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bernasconi, A. (2011). Private and Public Pathways to World-Class Research Universities: The Case of Chile. In The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities (pp. 229–259). Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The Evolving State-of-the-Art in Technology Transfer Research: Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulmer-Tomas, V. (2003). The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, B. R. (1993). The Research Foundations of Graduate Education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, B. R. (1995). Places of Inquiry: Research and Advanced Education in Modern Universities. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: International Association of Universities and Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Conrad, S. (2012). German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Conrad, S., & Eckert, A. (2007). Globalgeschichte, Globalisierung, multiple Modernen: Zur Geschichtsschreibung der modernen Welt [Global History, Globalization, Multiple Modernities: Towards the Global Description of the Modern World]. In S. Conrad, A. Eckert, & U. Freitag (Eds.), Globalgeschichte: Theorien, Ansätze, Themen [Global History: Theories, Approaches, Topics] (pp. 7–52). Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Crossley, M. (2012). Comparative Education and Research Capacity Building: Reflections on International Transfer and the Significance of Context. Journal of International Comparative Education, 1(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.14425/00.36.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crossley, M., & Tikly, L. (2004). Postcolonial Perspectives and Comparative and International Research in Education: A Critical Introduction. Comparative Education, 40(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000231329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Caldas, F. J. (1808/1942). Semanario del Nuevo Reino de Granada. Bogotá: Editorial Kelly.Google Scholar
  22. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic Careers, Patents, and Productivity: Industry Experience as Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaillard, J. F. (1994). North-South Research Partnership: Is Collaboration Possible Between Unequal Partners? Knowledge and Policy, 7(2), 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02692761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J.-Y. (2013). On the Drivers of International Collaboration: The Impact of Informal Communication, Motivation, and Research Resources. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 520–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krücken, G. (2003). Learning the ‘New, New Thing’: On the Role of Path Dependency. Higher Education, 46(3), 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lehr, S. (2008). Ethical Dilemmas in Individual and Collective Rights-Based Approaches to Tertiary Education Scholarships: The Cases of Canada and Cuba. Comparative Education, 44(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060802481454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Max Planck Society. (2016a). Cooperación científica con América Latina. https://www.mpg.de/10832876/Brochure_America_Latina_2016_WEB.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
  28. Max Planck Society. (2016b). International – Facts and Figures. https://www.mpg.de/international/facts_figures. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
  29. Max Planck Society. (2017a). CONICET-MPG Partner Institute Buenos Aires. https://www.mpg.de/7468700/Partner-Institute_Buenos-Aires. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
  30. Max Planck Society. (2017b). Cooperation with Latin America. https://www.mpg.de/7468478/Latin-America. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
  31. Max Planck Society. (2017c). Max Planck Institutes Abroad. https://www.mpg.de/272329/Max_Planck_Institutes_abroad. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
  32. Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. R. (2007). Public Research Institutions and Economic Catch-Up. Research Policy, 36(10), 1512–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merton, R. K. (1938). Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England. Osiris, 4, 360–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merton, R. K. (1973). The Normative Structure of Science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 267–280). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Merton, R. K. (1996). On Social Structure and Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options (Latin America Otherwise). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Neusel, A., Wolter, A., Engel, O., Kriszio, M., & Weichert, D. (2014). Internationale Mobilität und Professur: Karriereverläufe und Karrierebedingungen von Internationalen Professorinnen und Professoren an Hochschulen in Berlin und Hessen [International Mobility and Professorship: Carriers Paths and Carrier Conditions for International Professors in Universities in Berlin and Hessen]. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
  38. Nguyen, P.-M., Elliott, J. G., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2009). Neocolonialism in Education: Cooperative Learning in an Asian Context. Comparative Education, 45(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060802661428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ordoñez, S. (2008). Aspectos Geológicos del Viaje por Iberoamérica (1799–1804) de Alexander von Humboldt [Geographical Aspects of Alexander von Humboldt’s Voyage Through Iberoamerica (1799–1804)]. In Alexander von Humboldt: Estancia en España y Viaje Americano [Alexander von Humboldt: Visit in Spain and American Travel] (pp. 177–200). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [National Council of Scientific Research].Google Scholar
  40. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1997). National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. Pain, E. (2015). Max Planck Society Unveils €50 Million Support Plan for Young Scientists. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/03/max-planck-society-unveils-50-million-support-plan-young-scientists. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.
  42. Palacios, M. (2003). Entre la Legitimidad y la Violencia: Colombia 1875–1994 [Between Legitimacy and Violence: Colombia 1875–1994]. Bogotá: Editorial Norma.Google Scholar
  43. Piedrahita, S. (2004). La Escuela de Ciencias Naturales de la Universidad Nacional. Bogotá: Facultad de Ciencias Humanas.Google Scholar
  44. Pineda, P. (2015a). Institutional Frameworks and Scientific Productivity in Chile and Colombia 1950–2012. In G. Gregorrutti & J. E. Delgado (Eds.), Private Universities in Latin America: Research and Innovation in the Knowledge Economy (pp. 79–106). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pineda, P. (2015b). The Entrepreneurial Research University in Latin America: Global and Local Models in Chile and Colombia, 1950–2015. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quijano, A., & Ennis, M. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.Google Scholar
  47. Saldaña, J. J. (2006). Science and Freedom: Science and Technology as a Policy of the New American States. In J. J. Saldaña (Ed.), Science in Latin America: A History (pp. 151–162). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  48. Takayama, K., Sriprakash, A., & Connell, R. (2017). Toward a Postcolonial Comparative and International Education. Comparative Education Review, 61(S1), S1–S24. https://doi.org/10.1086/690455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thelin, J. R. (2011). A History of American Higher Education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Vessuri, H. (1994). The Institutionalization Process. In The Uncertain Quest. Science, Technology, and Development (pp. 168–200). Tokio: Universidad de las Naciones Unidas.Google Scholar
  51. Vom Brocke, B. (1996). Die Kaiser-Wilhelm-/Max-Planck-Gesellschaft und ihre Institut: Studien zu ihrer Geschichte das Harnack-Prinzip [The Harnack-Principle: The Kaiser-Wilmelm-Max Planck Society and Its Institutes: Studies About Their History]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  52. Ynalvez, M. A., & Shrum, W. M. (2011). Professional Networks, Scientific Collaboration, and Publication Productivity in Resource-Constrained Research Institutions in a Developing Country. Research Policy, 40(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zingerli, C. (2010). A Sociology of International Research Partnerships for Sustainable Development. The European Journal of Development Research, 22(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2010.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Pineda
    • 1
  • Bernhard Streitwieser
    • 2
  1. 1.International Centre for Higher Education Research (INCHER)University of KasselKasselGermany
  2. 2.Graduate School of Education and Human DevelopmentGeorge Washington UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations