Advertisement

Strange Bedfellows No More: Researching Business Process Outsourcing and Dynamic Innovation

  • Mary LacityEmail author
  • Leslie P. Willcocks
Chapter
Part of the Technology, Work and Globalization book series (TWG)

Abstract

This chapter answers the question: how do clients and business process outsourcing (BPO) service providers work together to foster dynamic innovation? Dynamic innovation is a process by which clients incent providers to deliver many innovations each year that improve the client’s performance in terms of operational efficiency, process effectiveness, and/or strategic impact.

References

  1. Babin, R., and Schuster, C. (2012). “Building Innovation into the Outsourcing Relationship: A Case Study”. The Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 2: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beverakis, G., Dick, G., and Cecez-Kecmanovic D. (2009). “Taking Information Systems Business Process Outsourcing Offshore: The Conflict of Competition and Risk”. Journal of Global Information Management, 17 (1): 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciravegna, L., and Maielli, G. (2011). “Outsourcing of New Product Development and the Opening of Innovation in Mature Industries: A Longitudinal Study of Fiat During Crisis and Recovery”. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (1): 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Datta, P., & Bhattacharya, K., (2012). “Innovation Returns and the Economics of Offshored IT R&D”. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 5 (1): 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davenport, T., Leibold, M., and Voel, S. (2006). Strategic Management in the Innovation Economy. Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, J., and Eisenhardt, L. (2011). “Rotating Leadership and Collaborative Innovation: Recombination Processes in Symbiotic Relationships”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56 (2): 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DiRomualdo, A., and Gurbaxani, V. (1998). “Strategic Intent for IT Outsourcing”. Sloan Management Review, 39 (4): 67–80.Google Scholar
  8. Fontana, A., and Frey, J. (1994). “Interviewing: The Art of Science”. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 361–376. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  9. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1999). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, 1967. Reprinted 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Grimpe, C., and Kaiser, U. (2010). “Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing”. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (8), 1483–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatonen, J. (2010). “Outsourcing and Licensing Strategies in Small Software Firms: Evolution of Strategies and Implications for Firm Growth, Internationalisation and Innovation”. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22 (5): 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kishore, R., Agarwal, M., and Rao, H.R. (2004). “Determinants of Sourcing During Technology Growth and Maturity: An Empirical Study of e-Commerce Sourcing”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21 (3): 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klein, H., and Myers, M. (1999). “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies”. MIS Quarterly, 23 (1): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  15. Lacity, M., Khan, S., and Yan, A. (2016). “Review of the Empirical Business Services Sourcing Literature: An Update and Future Directions”. Journal of Information Technology, 31 (2), 1–60.Google Scholar
  16. Lacity, M., Khan, S., Yan, A., and Willcocks, L.P. (2010). “A Review of the IT Outsourcing Empirical Literature and Future Research Directions”. Journal of Information Technology, 25 (4): 395–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lacity, M., Solomon, S., Yan, A., and Willcocks, L.P. (2011). “Business Process Outsourcing Studies: A Critical Review and Research Directions”. Journal of Information Technology, 26 (4): 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lacity, M., and Willcocks, L.P. (2012). Advanced Outsourcing Practice: Rethinking ITO, BPO, and Cloud Services. Palgrave, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lacity, M., and Willcocks, L.P. (2015). Nine Keys To World Class Business Process Outsourcing. Bloomsbury, London.Google Scholar
  20. Linder, J. (2004). “Transformational Outsourcing”. Sloan Management Review, 45 (2): 52–58.Google Scholar
  21. Lucena, A. (2011). “The Organizational Designs of R&D Activities and their Performance Implications: Empirical Evidence for Spain”. Industry and Innovation, 18 (2): 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahoney, C. (1997). “Common Qualitative Techniques.” In User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations, Published by the Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication for the National Science Foundation, publication number NSF97-153, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  23. Massini, S., and Miozzo, M. (2012). “Outsourcing and Offshoring of Business Services: Challenges to Theory, Management and Geography of Innovation”. Regional Studies, 46 (9): 1219–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McKeown, M. (2008). The Truth About Innovation. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  25. Moon, J., Swar, B., Choe, Y., Chung, M., and Jung, G. (2010). “Innovation in IT Outsourcing Relationships: Where is the Best Practice of IT Outsourcing in the Public Sector?”. Innovation: Management Policy & Practice, 12 (2), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nieto, M., and Rodríguez, A. (2011). “Offshoring of R&D: Looking Abroad to Improve Innovation Performance”. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oshri, I. (2012). “Innovation Returns from Offshored IT R&D: A Response Article”. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 5 (1): 36–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., and Gerbasi, A. (2012). “Can Client Firms Achieve Radical Innovation in IT Outsourcing?” In 6th Global Sourcing Workshop, Courchevel, France.Google Scholar
  29. Quinn, J.B. (2000). “Outsourcing Innovation: The New Engine of Growth”. Sloan Management Review, 41 (4): 13–28.Google Scholar
  30. Rao, M.T., Poole, W., Raven, P.V., and Lockwood, D.L. (2006). “Trends, Implications, and Responses to Global IT Sourcing: A Field Study”. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9 (3): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogers, E.M. (2006). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Sobol, M., and Apte, U. (1995). “Domestic and Global Outsourcing Practices of America’s most Effective IS Users”. Journal of Information Technology, 10: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stanko, M., and Calantone, R. (2011). “Controversy in Innovation Outsourcing Research: Review, Synthesis and Future Directions”. R & D Management, 41 (1): 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uriona-Maldonado, M., De Souza, L., and Varvakis, G. (2010). “Focus on Practice Service Process Innovation in the Brazilian Electric Energy Sector”. Service Business, 4 (1): 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weeks, M. (2004). Information Technology Outsourcing and Business Innovation: An Exploratory Study of a Conceptual Framework. Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  36. Weeks, M., and Feeny, D. (2008). “Outsourcing from Cost Management to Innovation and Business Value”. California Management Review, 50 (4): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weeks, M., and Thomason, S. (2011). “An Exploratory Assessment of the Linkages Between HRM Practices, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation in Outsourcing Relationships”. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (2): 303–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whitley, E., and Willcocks, L.P. (2011). “Achieving Step-Change in Outsourcing Maturity: Toward Collaborative Innovation”. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10 (3): 95–107.Google Scholar
  39. Wright, R. (2012). “Why Innovations are Arguments”. Sloan Management Review, 53 (3): 96–95.Google Scholar
  40. Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Third Edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MissouriSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations